One of Mt. Bachelor's terrain parks. (FTO file photo: Marc Guido)

Oregon Supreme Court Finds Ski Area Liability Release Unenforceable

Bend, OR – Myles Bagley was an 18-year-old Bend resident and snowboarder with a season pass to nearby Mt. Bachelor in 2006. On February 16 of that year, Bagley crashed on a jump in the resort’s terrain park, fracturing two vertebrae that left him permanently paralyzed.

Fast forward nearly nine years. In that period, Bagley’s $21.5 million litigation against Mt. Bachelor, Inc. has passed through the Deschutes County Circuit Court and the Oregon Court of Appeals before reaching the Oregon Supreme Court, which last month reversed the decision of the two lower courts and will allow Bagley’s lawsuit to proceed.

One of Mt. Bachelor's terrain parks. (FTO file photo: Marc Guido)
One of Mt. Bachelor’s terrain parks. (FTO file photo: Marc Guido)

Bagley contends that Mt. Bachelor was negligent in the in the design, construction, maintenance, or inspection of the jump upon which he crashed. Mt. Bachelor moved for summary judgment, relying upon the liability release signed by Bagley when he purchased his season pass. The trial court granted Mt. Bachelor’s motion to dismiss Bagley’s lawsuit, a decision which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

RELATED STORY:  Deer Valley Scores Accolades at World Ski Awards

Bagley appealed that decision to the Oregon Supreme Court, which found on Dec. 18 that “enforcement of the release would be unconscionable” and remanded Bagley’s case against Mt. Bachelor to the trial court.

“Because the release is unenforceable, genuine issues of fact
exist that preclude summary judgment in defendant’s favor,” Justice David Brewer wrote.

“Plaintiff had no opportunity in this case to negotiate for different terms or pay an additional fee for protection against defendant’s negligence,”  Brewer explained in finding Mt. Bachelor’s liability release contrary to public policy. “What makes the substantial disparity in the parties’ bargaining positions even more significant in this circumstance is the limited number of ski areas that provide downhill skiing and snowboarding opportunities in Oregon, and the generality of the use of similar releases among that limited commercial cohort. Simply put, plaintiff had no meaningful alternative to defendant’s take-it-or-leave-it terms if he wanted to participate in downhill snowboarding.”

Bagley’s lawsuit has thus been returned to the Deschutes County Circuit Court to proceed. No trial date has yet been set.

RELATED STORY:  Family Ski Trips to Soak Up Montana's Mountain Magic

Leave a Reply