Uinta Mountains skiing 6/7/2014

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
Day 81: I said that I was done.

I said it, and I meant it. I'd put all of my ski gear away for the summer, content with wrapping things up with Day 80 on Memorial Day. It's June, which means for me at least that it's time to move on to other things.

But last night we sat around having our usual Friday night sushi and figuring out what we were doing this weekend. Bobby Danger was playing golf. AmyZ wanted to ski. I didn't want to ski, instead I wanted to take my dog Jake for a hike. It didn't take long to figure out that we could combine both hiking with the dog and skiing, although there was no way to include Bobby's golf. What the hell, I've lived here for nearly 10 years and had yet to make a single turn in the Uintas. Others like schubwa get to bring their dogs along skiing all the time; with our prime ski terrain all located within watershed, where dogs are prohibited, I don't often get that luxury, especially because there's no plowed road into the Uintas until Memorial Day (or often later).

So I found myself today in the Uinta Mountains with skis on my back.

20140607_102459.jpg


Our plan was to ski the north face of Murdock Mountain, elevation 11,212 feet. We'd park one vehicle at 10,693-foot Bald Mountain Pass, and spot the other at the bottom of the run, shaving off a couple of hundred feet of climbing. I figured that with Murdock's high elevation, easy road access, and a windswept summit that gets buffeted all winter by southerly winds that deposit snow on the north-facing aspect, we'd find ample remaining snowpack and easy skiing.

There wasn't quite as much left as I'd hoped for, but it was still nothing to sneeze at.

20140607_095957.jpg


We decided to ski the centermost of the three lines at the center of that photo. We left my truck at the bottom and drove AmyZ's Subaru to Bald Mountain Pass. Skinning wouldn't be an option, for there was no continuous snow to reach that line. We'd have to pack in.

20140607_103518.jpg


20140607_103713.jpg


20140607_105856.jpg


Walking on solid ground was at first actually much easier than on snow, for the snow along the sun-exposed ridgeline was downright rotten. Every few steps you'd unexpectedly punch through up to your crotch, and then you'd have to dig yourself out. It was slow going, with ample rest stops along the way.

20140607_105913.jpg


20140607_113924.jpg


20140607_115329.jpg


Eventually, however, we had no choice but to cross a massive field of scree that left me wistfully wishing for snow up to my crotch instead. Our snail's pace slowed even further. Ski tails would catch on massive boulders as you crossed your fingers and swung from the top of one wobbly rock to another. Even with the Vibram soles of my Garmonts, ski boots weren't the footwear of choice.

20140607_121312.jpg


20140607_122747.jpg


20140607_120929.jpg


We nevertheless managed to keep the Vibram side down and made it unscathed, arriving atop a 40-degree line of relatively smooth corn, lacking the sun cups that covered all snow on flatter terrain. We hung out for a while at the top, enjoying a spectacular day in the High Uintas before shoving off. I kicked out a small platform on which we could stand and for clicking in. You could tell that Jake was wondering, "What the *^&% are we doing sitting and just hanging out in snow this steep?" Once we got skiing, however, Jake was a real champ -- he lunged down that 40-degree chute as fast as we were skiing it.

20140607_123943.jpg


20140607_130908_9.jpg


20140607_131314_5.jpg


20140607_131321_2.jpg


20140607_131444_1.jpg


20140607_131456.jpg


20140607_132247.jpg


We arrived back at the truck for lunch: smoked turkey sandwiches from Samak Smokehouse, washed down with a Sierra Nevada. While we sat there four guys drove by in a Jeep convertible, all shouting and hollering their approval at the fact that we'd been skiing. :mrgreen:

After lunch we drove the truck up to the pass, parked next to AmyZ's car and headed up for a second run. This time we'd avoid the scree and skin to the top of the trees visible on the far right of the Murdock Mountain photo above.

20140607_151406.jpg


By this time (now nearly 4 p.m.) the snow was getting manky, and the run was nowhere near the quality of the first one. But it was fun nonetheless. Once we arrived at the flats we donned skins once again and headed up to the pass to our waiting vehicles.

The lower western Uintas are right now as green as I've ever seen them. There's an enormous amount of water still flowing out of those mountains, so en route home we stopped by Provo River Falls to get a look at what they look like during spring runoff.

20140607_162829.jpg


Now, I've said it before, but this time I really mean it: I'm done. 81 days spread over 8 months is as much of a ski season as a guy could want.
 
admin":2lsh9g9q said:
81 days spread over 8 months is as much of a ski season as a guy could want.
Patrick would have a different opinion. 8 months is what several of my better seasons have been. This year was a modest 6, hard to get more when your home region has a crappy year.

That part of the Uintas looks like a reasonable ski option, especially after you figured out how to avoid the scree field. Late season snowpack rates to be lower than the sweet spot of the Wasatch, not only for lesser snowfall, but I suspect Uinta snow is lower density too.
 
Tony Crocker":3fpelymh said:
admin":3fpelymh said:
81 days spread over 8 months is as much of a ski season as a guy could want.
Patrick would have a different opinion. 8 months is what several of my better seasons have been. This year was a modest 6, hard to get more when your home region has a crappy year.

Once again you're applying your standard to someone else's preferences. You and perhaps Patrick may feel that way but I feel differently. You may recall that in 2005-2006 I bagged 20 consecutive months. I no longer give a rat's a$$ about doing that again. It's June, and for me it's now time for mountain biking, kayaking, climbing, camping, off-roading, backpacking, canyoneering, etc. in the four short months that I have to enjoy those alternatives before we start skiing again. Skiing occupies my heart and soul, but not to the point that I'm ready to focus solely on that to the detriment of other activities that I also enjoy. AmyZ wants to keep skiing next week. I frankly couldn't care less, and I flat out told her so yesterday.

Tony Crocker":3fpelymh said:
That part of the Uintas looks like a reasonable ski option, especially after you figured out how to avoid the scree field.

We knew full well how to avoid that scree field, even before we started up for our first run. Before skiing we drove north of Bald Mountain Pass to look back at Murdock's north face and scout our opportunities. That first line, however, looked to be so much better and longer than anything else that it was worth it to just suck it up and go for it. The real winner yesterday would've been Mount Watson, the most prominent mountain visible at center in the distance in this photo:

file.php


Watson had numerous top-to-bottom lines visible on its eastern aspect, and the north face of Watson has even more enticing lines that were out of view. mrgskier should remember that well, for we camped at the base of Watson's north side in 2012. That, however, would've required a three-mile hike in from the Washington Lake trailhead -- six miles round trip -- to even reach the bottom of the skiing, and that was more than we wanted to do for a day trip. 11,527-foot Mount Watson and its surrounding peaks are the westernmost of the High Uintas, and as such I suspect that they squeeze a bit more moisture out of incoming storms than their counterparts further east within the range, like Mount Murdock which we were skiing and Bald Mountain across the road. Furthermore, Watson and adjacent Notch Mountain appear to create a funneling effect to flows coming in from the northwest along Weber Canyon from the lowlands. Remember that in that photo above you're looking at east-facing lines on Watson while we were skiing an aspect on Murdock that points due north.

uintas topo.jpg


Elevation in the Uintas is on average much higher than the Wasatch. While the vast majority of the peaks top out at similar elevations (notwithstanding the fact that there are five Uintas mountains over 13,000 feet, unlike the Wasatch which max out at less than 12,000) the Uintas sit on top of a much higher plateau. Look at that topo -- those mountains unexpectedly jut out like pimples on a prom queen's face from relatively flat land that's all around 10,000-10,500 feet, unlike the peaks and deep canyons of the Wasatch. Put it all together and that's a rather huge massif. While there's no hard data available to back me up, I'd venture a guess that the area around Mount Watson gets as much, if not more snowfall than the Wasatch. Anecdotal evidence, such as that observed yesterday, appears to support that belief.

Tony Crocker":3fpelymh said:
Late season snowpack rates to be lower than the sweet spot of the Wasatch

I don't agree. Driving home yesterday it was clearly visible that the areas around Snake Creek behind Alta's Point Supreme, Clayton Peak behind Brighton, and the entire Park City ridgeline are now all nearly devoid of snow. The Wasatch Crest mountain bike route is now rideable. I was watching the news last night and during a story about a hiker's fatal fall yesterday at Donut Falls, in upper Big Cottonwood Canyon, there was nothing but lush greenery to be seen and witnesses to the incident described a trail that was completely dry. Temperatures over the past several weeks have run well above normal, and there are just a few key spots within the ski areas of Little Cottonwood Canyon that have more snow right now than what we found yesterday. The fact that some of the lower mountain areas in Little Cottonwood can still be negotiated on skis is thanks largely due to snowmaking efforts from last November and December.

Tony Crocker":3fpelymh said:
not only for lesser snowfall, but I suspect Uinta snow is lower density too

Pfffffffffttttttt! Not yesterday! That stuff weighed about 500 lbs. per cubic inch. The density of what fell in February means absolutely nothing to what it feels like in June.
 
Tony Crocker":1uiffrc0 said:
admin":1uiffrc0 said:
81 days spread over 8 months is as much of a ski season as a guy could want.
Patrick would have a different opinion. 8 months is what several of my better seasons have been. This year was a modest 6, hard to get more when your home region has a crappy year.

That part of the Uintas looks like a reasonable ski option, especially after you figured out how to avoid the scree field. Late season snowpack rates to be lower than the sweet spot of the Wasatch, not only for lesser snowfall, but I suspect Uinta snow is lower density too.
Who peed in your cornflakes this morning? Frankly, who gives a crap about Patrick's opinion of someone else's ski season? If someone is not engaged in some kind of ski related activity 100% of the time 100% of their days, it's just not good enough for you? Most people aren't that one-dimensional.
 
My comments weren't intended as critical, much more like envy. I thought the skiing looked good and with respect to the scree field I misunderstood that the runs were in 2 separate locations and thus the scree was unavoidable for the first run. On my last San Gorgonio misadventure in May 2011 I wandered all over the place and ended up skiing something I could have done with about 1/4 the effort getting there. Since it was your first time skiing the Uintas I thought the initial navigation might have included some trial and error like mine.

The 8 month comment was intended complimentary also. It was basically a statement that an above average season in California is not that different from a below average season in Utah.

How much snowpack is around in June is much more a function of SWE than snowfall. In normal years Bachelor and Mammoth June snowpacks may be more than in LCC even though considerable more snow falls in LCC. I suspect the Uintas are more continental with lower SWE snow as it falls than in the Wasatch. If Mt. Watson is high and on the leading edge it's probably more like the Wasatch.

MarcC":2pzrhd9c said:
Frankly, who gives a crap about Patrick's opinion of someone else's ski season? If someone is not engaged in some kind of ski related activity 100% of the time 100% of their days, it's just not good enough for you? Most people aren't that one-dimensional.
Who peed in YOUR cornflakes this morning? Patrick's quest is an obvious benchmark in the context of FTO over the years. I've probably questioned its sanity more than admin has. As for me, I decided in April that Memorial Day at Mammoth would not likely be up to its usual standards and we went back East for a couple of weeks instead.
 
Back
Top