Hello. My friend demo'd 2008 K2 Burnin Luvs last year, in 153cm and 160cms. She loved them! She thinks she liked the 160cms better. I ordered them online (2008's) for a surprise for her for a Christmas gift, in 160cms. They couldn't get the 2008's, so replaced them with a 2009, but sent 163cms instead of the 160's that I ordered. I'm worried that they might be too long. They didn't tell me when they replaced the order with 2009 Burnin Luvs, that K2 changed their sizes on the 2009s. They are now 156cms and 163cms, instead of 153 and 160cms. Had I known, I probably would have opted to get the 156cms, and not the 163's. So, which size do you think would be better for my friend....156 or 163? She's 5'5", 132 lbs. I would say she's between a strong advanced skier, and a weeker expert. She skis very well, but not very agressive.
I did notice with the 2009 Burnin Luvs, that the tail curves up quite a bit, so I don't know if you ski them longer than a ski where the tail doesn't curve up so much.
Thanks!
Pam
I did notice with the 2009 Burnin Luvs, that the tail curves up quite a bit, so I don't know if you ski them longer than a ski where the tail doesn't curve up so much.
Thanks!
Pam