Marc_C wrote:You didn't exactly go lightweight, did you?
kingslug wrote:The Dukes are heavy..but I wanted something that could hold...me..and they where $200.00 cheaper than other ones...I could always change them if I don't like them...anyway, I'm going to be able to hike easier than before.
Outback...also a restaurant.
Just checked the weight diff between the Fritschi and the Duke...10 oz. per pair..I can deal with that.
rfarren wrote:Of course, with what I've been told about Bobby Danger, perhaps there is no need for AT bindings and boots at all... of course,the rest of us are mere mortals.
kingslug wrote:Well ..the skis ar lighter than what I used to go on..the boots are 2 pounds lighter..not sure about the bindings compared to what I have now though...
Admin wrote::bs: That's plenty of boot for him.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Skidog wrote:EDIT: Sorry Garmont lists the endorphin as 130 flex...LOL....Quest is 120 flex...you couldnt flex the quest but the Garmont is 130...again... on Garmont.
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot], MSNbot Media and 0 guests