Climategate in the Popular Media

Topics of a general nature regarding snowsports, which don't easily fit into one of our other Liftlines categories. This is also the place to post Letters to the Editor.

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Tony Crocker » Fri Feb 12, 2010 7:04 pm

I'm the first one to comment about outlier data points. But it takes collective amnesia for the Quebecers to say with a straight face how
less snowy their winters have become over the past 15-18 years

in view of what happened 2 years ago.

And with regard to long term data, in all 8 North American ski regions that I analyze there is no discernable trend in snowfall over the past 35 years.

As Patrick notes correctly precipitation trend does not necessarily follow temperature trend in either direction. There are probably some locations where there is noticeably more rain/less snow than in the 1970's, but the ski areas for which I have data do not seem to include any of them, with the possible exception of the Whistler base.
http://bestsnow.net
Ski Records
Season length: 21 months, Nov. 29, 2010 - July 2, 2012
Days in one year: 80 from Nov. 29, 2010 - Nov. 17, 2011
Season vertical: 1,610K in 2016-17
Season powder: 291K in 2011-12
User avatar
Tony Crocker
 
Posts: 9820
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:37 am
Location: Avatar: Charlotte Bay, Antarctica 2011
Location: Glendale, California

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby jamesdeluxe » Sat Feb 13, 2010 5:57 am

To clarify my comment about the Quebecois who were so upset about environmental change, far more of their comments were about the average temperature than about snowfall. Also, according to them, vicious NCP events that go all the way up to Quebec City (like the one three weeks ago) were far less common a couple decades back. I mentioned this in a Le Massif piece I did for Alpine Zone five years ago:

The night of my arrival, temperatures shot up into the mid 40s. The next morning, I drove north on scenic Route 138 through a near monsoon — the kind where it's raining so hard, even with your windshield wipers at the ultra-high speed, you still can't see anything. On radio talk shows, people were shaking their heads in disbelief at what had happened to their sacred winter.
http://forums.alpinezone.com/showthread.php?t=3238

For the record, the global warming debate is, oddly enough, one of very few topics on which I don't have a very pronounced opinion.
User avatar
jamesdeluxe
 
Posts: 3337
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 3:19 pm
Location: South Orange, NJ

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Skiace » Wed May 05, 2010 3:14 am

Bumping this thread with an interesting news update. After two inqury's, the group has apparently been exonerated.

Press release of the inquiry:
The Oxburgh findings are the result of the latest scrutiny of CRU’s research. The first was the original peer review which led to publication in some of the world’s leading international science journals; the second was the Inquiry by the Parliamentary Science and Technology Committee. Taken together, these must represent one of the most searching examinations of any body of scientific research. The veracity of CRU’s research remains intact after this examination.


You can read the full inquiry here

They have criticisms of the statistical methods used, but are saying that the underlying research and results are sound nevertheless.

EDIT: I got this from Slashdot, haven't found a mainstream news outlet article on it yet.
EDIT2: Apparently it was in the NY Times a month ago http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/scien ... itbrf.html
User avatar
Skiace
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:16 pm
Location: San Diego

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Tony Crocker » Fri May 14, 2010 6:26 pm

After two inqury's, the group has apparently been exonerated.

The inquiries seem rather narrowly focused upon the tree ring studies. As I've mentioned before, it's likely that temperature data over the next decade will sort out this debate to a large degree. Climategate has probably served a useful purpose in that future climate data collection will likely be subject to more disclosure and independent verification.
http://bestsnow.net
Ski Records
Season length: 21 months, Nov. 29, 2010 - July 2, 2012
Days in one year: 80 from Nov. 29, 2010 - Nov. 17, 2011
Season vertical: 1,610K in 2016-17
Season powder: 291K in 2011-12
User avatar
Tony Crocker
 
Posts: 9820
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:37 am
Location: Avatar: Charlotte Bay, Antarctica 2011
Location: Glendale, California

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby flyover » Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:09 am

I know I'm going to regret this, but here goes . . .

From the op ed page of the WSJ: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... 27348.html

From the Economist: http://www.economist.com/node/21533360
flyover
 
Posts: 303
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:17 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby berkshireskier » Thu Nov 03, 2011 1:35 pm

Yea, nothing like knocking the hornet's nest off the corner of the house to stir up trouble. Admittedly, the new study, widely publicized recently, does seem to be a more comprehensive and reliable review of the data on global temperatures, although I'm sure some scientists will find ways to criticize it before long. Furthermore, they apparently make no conclusions about what may be causing the warming that they detected in the data. Temperatures have fluctuated over the 4.5 billion year history of the earth.
berkshireskier
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: Western Massachusetts

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Geoff » Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:11 pm

berkshireskier wrote:Temperatures have fluctuated over the 4.5 billion year history of the earth.


Nobody is arguing the fact that temperatures have gone up 0.911°C in the last 50 years. What is open to debate is why the temperature went up. You could defend a theory that it is caused solar fluctuation about as well as you could defend greenhouse gasses or thermal absorption of previously reflected energy from man paving the world with black asphalt.

Since nobody knows for sure, it makes sense to try to limit man's impact on the environment. ...but good luck getting China or India to sign up.
User avatar
Geoff
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Killington, VT

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Patrick » Thu Nov 03, 2011 3:36 pm

Geoff wrote:but good luck getting China or India to sign up.

Why would they sign on? What is there per capital contribution to the problem?
If Americans Politicians would be put in China or India's shoes...they would argued that it's going to hurt our economy.
Why the different standard of living? Why can the people in the West have x cars per capital, huge home and consume like crazy while we cannot expand our economic.
The accumulated green-house gases have been accumulating for decades and what was our input in this? We just got started building our economy and it's a hoax by the West to keep us in poverty to remain the dominate power.

You're right, it's not going to be easy. Unfortunately it was for the West to start showing their good faith by getting the ball rolling, but North American Federal Governments + Australia and Japan totally failed on this. Lucky some local initiatives are helping, but it's isn't enough without clear leadership at the top level.
Ski Mad World
A blog of MadPat's World: A History of Skiing Geography
http://madpatski.wordpress.com
User avatar
Patrick
 
Posts: 4729
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 6:19 am
Location: The Great Trip 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Tony Crocker » Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:10 pm

+1 to Geoff's comments, pretty much sums it up.

I am impressed by the effort to validate the 100 year change with much spotty or contaminated data and I have no reason to believe those numbers aren't right. I wonder if they noted the plateau of the past decade+ as GHG production has accelerated.
http://bestsnow.net
Ski Records
Season length: 21 months, Nov. 29, 2010 - July 2, 2012
Days in one year: 80 from Nov. 29, 2010 - Nov. 17, 2011
Season vertical: 1,610K in 2016-17
Season powder: 291K in 2011-12
User avatar
Tony Crocker
 
Posts: 9820
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:37 am
Location: Avatar: Charlotte Bay, Antarctica 2011
Location: Glendale, California

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Admin » Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:19 pm

Patrick wrote:
Geoff wrote:but good luck getting China or India to sign up.

Why would they sign on? What is there per capital contribution to the problem?


Are you effin' kidding me? Seriously? :roll: When you're talking about the two most populous countries on the planet, "per capita" ain't the issue.
Image

Image
User avatar
Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 9976
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 9:32 am
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby rfarren » Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:46 pm

Patrick wrote:Why the different standard of living?

:brick:
UGHHH!!! Come on... you love to ski, perhaps the most carbon intensive hobby in the world.... talk about different quality of life.

This just bespeaks on something I don't even want to get into....

Tony Crocker wrote:+1 to Geoff's comments, pretty much sums it up.

I am impressed by the effort to validate the 100 year change with much spotty or contaminated data and I have no reason to believe those numbers aren't right. I wonder if they noted the plateau of the past decade+ as GHG production has accelerated.
[/quote]
Bingo... I'm pretty sure we're experiencing serious global cooling over the last 15 million years, even more markedly so over the last 4.5 billion.
Rob
User avatar
rfarren
 
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby rfarren » Thu Nov 03, 2011 6:50 pm

Admin wrote:
Patrick wrote:
Geoff wrote:but good luck getting China or India to sign up.

Why would they sign on? What is there per capital contribution to the problem?


Are you effin' kidding me? Seriously? :roll: When you're talking about the two most populous countries on the planet, "per capita" ain't the issue.

+1
Rob
User avatar
rfarren
 
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Patrick » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:05 pm

rfarren wrote:
Patrick wrote:Why the different standard of living?

:brick:
UGHHH!!! Come on...


If Americans Politicians would be put in China or India's shoes...they would argued that it's going to hurt our economy.
Why the different standard of living?


If you guys can dictate that China or India can't come even close to the North American standard of living even before we can make an effort.

Admin wrote:
Patrick wrote:
Geoff wrote:but good luck getting China or India to sign up.

Why would they sign on? What is there per capital contribution to the problem?


Are you effin' kidding me? Seriously? :roll: When you're talking about the two most populous countries on the planet, "per capita" ain't the issue.


Per capital GHG? US and Canada produced approx 800% more than China and 1600% more than India. (regardless of the table and calculation used - the huge margin is there).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_co ... per_capita

So do you think there are going to make a sacrifice before any serious effort on our part? It like talking about people around a buffet table with one big fat guy with his plat over flowing versus a family of 4 with the same amount of food divide between them and the fat guy talking about they should cut down on the food they consume.

Stop looking and thinking about yourself first, if you think other countries are going to make the first step without a more from the US, it ain't going to happen. That is the problem, everyone is thinking, why should I go anything if the others don't. :dead horse:
Ski Mad World
A blog of MadPat's World: A History of Skiing Geography
http://madpatski.wordpress.com
User avatar
Patrick
 
Posts: 4729
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 6:19 am
Location: The Great Trip 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby rfarren » Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:48 pm

Patrick wrote:Stop looking and thinking about yourself first

I agree, and so should you. Stop flying to South America and Europe, quite driving to ski, and stop skiing. I think that should take a huge bite out of any carbon foot print. So, shall we start?

If not, that comment is no less than hypocritical.

BTW, just because one lives in the US doesn't meant they don't do their part. As you say, it's all about personal responsibility.
Rob
User avatar
rfarren
 
Posts: 2135
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 4:02 pm
Location: New York City

Re: Climategate in the Popular Media

Postby Geoff » Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:23 pm

Patrick wrote:Stop looking and thinking about yourself first, if you think other countries are going to make the first step without a more from the US, it ain't going to happen. That is the problem, everyone is thinking, why should I go anything if the others don't. :dead horse:


The jump in energy costs has done a pretty good job of trimming the average American's carbon footprint. Over the last 30 years, car fleet MPG has improved from sub-20 MPG to more than 30 MPG. SUVs and Pickups are still very inefficient but large SUV sales are way down. People started paying more attention to insulation and air leaks in their houses. The newest housing stock is almost too tight and you can have air exchange problems if you often have a lot of people in the house.

I still can't believe how much my electric bill dropped last summer when I went from window AC units to a mini-split. I flipped over to LED lighting for the lights that are used most often. I'm happy with the light from the new Philips bulbs. 12 watts vs 60 watts makes a big difference. I have a modern refrigerator that is efficient. The only energy hogs are my plasma screens and they're pretty new so they're only about a 40% penalty compared to LCD screens.

Economics controls people's energy behavior. If energy is expensive, people will take steps to be more careful. $4.00/gallon gasoline and $3.00/gallon home heating fuel is enough to change behavior.
User avatar
Geoff
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Killington, VT

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 7 guests


All content herein copyright © 1999-2017 First Tracks!! Online Media

Forums Terms & Conditions of Use