Patrick
Well-known member
Mont St-Sauveur : November 26, 2011 – Back to our roots and zits!!!
http://madpatski.wordpress.com/2011/12/ ... -and-zits/
http://madpatski.wordpress.com/2011/12/ ... -and-zits/
You've traveled enough to know that your gear is probably going to get there with you, but it's not 100% thing. One delay and missed flight for their gear and it would have been real complicated, especially when you consider the Asia (Dubai), Europe (Zermatt), Africa (in the Atlas in Morrocco) and NA (Montreal) in 4 days. I'm not even counting the transfer between airport and snow.Tony Crocker":399p9coo said:their trip was planned enough in advance that the best logistics to get it done in 10 days was to land at 6PM at an international airport close to night skiing, thus Montreal. Doing it in 10 days vs. 11 obviously had higher priority than quality for them.
Tony Crocker":399p9coo said:No question in my mind that this day at MSS was done only for streak purposes.
This one I understand. Far better than paying through the nose to battle crowds and mediocre conditions at some destination resort during "zoo week" in what is shaping up to be a slow starting season. Save the $ and vacation time for QUALITY during Ontario spring break. :stir:Patrick":1t9cjr4l said:Skiing 5 days during the Christmas week at Edelweiss is going to be brutal
Tony Crocker":3rbnlym0 said:This one I understand. Far better than paying through the nose to battle crowds and mediocre conditions at some destination resort during "zoo week" in what is shaping up to be a slow starting season. Save the $ and vacation time for QUALITY during Ontario spring break. :stir:Patrick":3rbnlym0 said:Skiing 5 days during the Christmas week at Edelweiss is going to be brutal
Tony Crocker":1t2ql6ld said:The referenced article, "Climate change will wipe out Quebec skiing," is complete![]()
![]()
.
Tony Crocker":1t2ql6ld said:Those 3-5 days are more likely to hit the shoulder seasons, so maybe November openings get pushed back a week, though I suspect snowmaking technology improvements in the past 30 years offset that.
Tony Crocker":10se2la9 said:Presumably Patrick has heard of urban heat island effect. Ski areas, being in more rural locations, are in fact much more reliable places to monitor weather/climate changes than cities. L.A. winters are warmer too, with a dramatic decrease in the widespread fog episodes I remember growing up. Nonetheless there seems to be little change in mountain weather here or in the Sierra. The Mansfield Stake would be an excellent source to analyze temperature and rain vs. snow with their daily records. I have them back to 1982 but the first half of that is hard copy records I would have to unearth sometime.
TORONTO - Environment Canada has released figures showing the likelihood of a white Christmas has gone down in most cities across the country.
The agency compared average snow on the ground on Dec. 25 for two periods: the years from 1964 to 1982 (then), and the years from 1991 to 2009 (now).
Here is a summary of their findings:
Calgary: 74 per cent then, 47 per cent now.
Charlottetown: 95 per cent then, 63 per cent now.
Edmonton: 100 per cent then, 79 per cent now.
Fredericton: 84 per cent then, 58 per cent now.
Halifax: 63 per cent then, 47 per cent now.
Kelowna, B.C. 74 per cent then, 42 per cent now.
Montreal: 79 per cent then, 68 per cent now.
Ottawa: 79 per cent then, 79 per cent now.
Penticton, B.C.: 37 per cent then, 21 per cent now.
Quebec: 100 per cent then, 95 per cent now.
Saint John, N.B.: 65 per cent then, 41 per cent now.
Sarnia, Ont.: 79 per cent then, 32 per cent now.
Sudbury, Ont.: 100 per cent then, 89 per cent now.
Sydney, N.S.: 68 per cent then, 47 per cent now.
Thunder Bay, Ont.: 100 per cent then, 89 per cent now.
Toronto (Greater Toronto Area): 63 per cent then, 42 per cent now.
Toronto (City)): 47 per cent then, 37 per cent now.
Vancouver: 21 per cent then, 11 per cent now.
Windsor, Ont.: 42 per cent then, 37 per cent now.
There's not much dispute that the latter period was overall warmer than the prior period. Cites near sea level at Christmas are at marginal locations/time of year for snow cover and thus sensitive to small changes in climate, even without considering urban heat island effect.Patrick":i1gjs55x said:the years from 1964 to 1982 (then), and the years from 1991 to 2009 (now)
Anthony":2zakfmog said:I will go along with Patrick on this one as with about 45 years of skiing in Quebec have noticed and recorded the shorter seasons . If you look at the season in Quebec from November 15 to April 15 we have already lost a month . The one or two trails that are currently open is where we should have been a month ago . Then you have the thaws that go on during the regular season to add to the fun which are also longer and more intense than in the past . It is unfortunate but this appears to be the current pattern . Eastern skiing always unpredictable has become even more unpredictable . Don't see this ski season turning around to January . Can't stand the WROD SKIING . Went out last week from something to do and bailed after a hour - bored to death .
Western Canada is looking OK, though mostly from a big November, not so much this month. Lots of the western US is in WROD mode. I'm at Mammoth now and it would not be open at all if not for snowmaking.Anthony":236n7cod said:The west is looking good !!!
I do remember hearing something about this; do you have a link to the discussion? It could be my memory, but I’m thinking someone other than me did the analysis you are talking about. I say this because 1) I don’t know how I would even do an analysis like that, and 2) although I do recall reading something about that on the forum, my best recollection is not really putting much stock in it, which I think I would do if I went through the trouble to do the analysis. I’m just suspicious about my involvement because I’m not really keen on the whole climate modeling/climate change topic anyway. I’m not going to say that the studies in the field aren’t scientific, because they are. But as a scientist, it’s far removed from the type of work we do, where when one has hypotheses, they are physically tested in experiments with controls, and one gets a verified empirical result. We use computer modeling as well, and as great as it is, its value is far, far below doing the actual experiments (and we see this proven time and time again). So in the climate field where for so much of the work the only option is in silico modeling, and politics seem to play such a huge role, I’d say I’m very much “meh” to the whole thing. Anyway, let me know what you find, it’s possible I was involved somehow.Tony Crocker":2v01ov3u said:The referenced article, "Climate change will wipe out Quebec skiing," is complete![]()
![]()
. JSpin analyzed this issue a while back, concluded the typical New England areas would lose 3-5 days a season of snowmaking (in line with my seat-of-the-pants guess) with an ongoing temperature rise similar to that of the 1980's and 1990's.
powderfreak":17f2wmxn said:We'll put, Tony. Dead on in my opinion. I'd argue that a .9F raise in temps might only effect snowmaking by 1-3 days. Lets consider Burlington, VT (BTV) temperatures where the average temperature for 24 hours is 32F. Also remember, that BTV at 300ft is probably up to a full month ahead of 3,000ft at Killington for the average daily temp of 32F. BTV averages 32F on March 18, 19, 20 based on records back to the late 1800s. A 1F increase in temps would therefore speed that process up by 3 days and BTV's average temps increase a degree every 2-3 days in the spring. Therefore, I'd argue that the effects of an increase in temps (even 3F which is huge when talking long term) would decreasing Killington's snowmaking time by 9 days in the spring and 9 days in the fall. For the most part though, we are talking about 2-3 days in the fall and 2-3 days in the spring.
Now that I think about it, 2-3 days in the fall might make it harder to open in October but certainly by early November 90% of the time. 2-3 days in the spring is negligible because they often stop making snow in February unless it doesn't look like we'll make it through March/early April. I know there are two snowmaking phases...get stuff open...then refresh and stockpile in early melt-out areas. Killington could make snow through April (just at night, but still like they do in late Oct and early Nov) if they wanted to.
I just can't peg them shortening the season on climate change...its 100% a business choice.