Serre Chevalier+Montgenevre 2/2/26-2/7/26

skiandgolfnut

Active member
After a lot of false starts, a flight cancellation, and a switch from Zurich to Milan I ultimately decided to take our group of 4 to Serre Chevalier. The forecast showed a storm for much of the southern alps for Monday evening and on and off snowfall/clouds throughout the rest of the week. Given our groups mixed ability and desire to have some trees to hide in during low visibility stretches Serre seemed to fit the bill. While it was lesser known to us than the previous resorts we have visited it was reviewed in these forums highly and seemed like an ideal fit.

Day 1:

After arriving in Milan early in the morning we ultimately got to our hotel in Briancon at around 11:30 and were on the Prorel gondola by 1. With heavy snow forecasted to move in that evening the light was flat by around 2. We stayed on piste doing laps on the gondola not wanting to stray too far from Briancon with the weather as it was. Low visibility at the top but about 10% down the way it was clearer and these were ultimately nice long laps which were much needed after the long flight and being the first day on skis this year. As I had hoped, trees lined these pistes making for decent visibility.

IMG_0541 (2).jpg

Our hotel was only 3 months old, an old converted army barrack a 5 minute walk from the gondola with its own ski locker by the lift. While posts here and elsewhere were right about the lack of ambiance around the gondola base, dinner in the old town was lovely and only a short 5 minute car ride. The central area of Briancon was also only a 10 minute walk from the hotel.


Day 2:

IMG_0586.jpg


Roughly 8 inches of snow by morning with no clearing forecasted for the day. We met our guide for the trip at 9 AM at the gondola but unfortunately the lift was closed due to the weather. It is quite an old gondola so I suspect this may happen fairly frequently. Thankfully he had a van and brought us all over to the Chantamerle base area where we departed for the day. We took a quick warm up on piste down to Foret and from there went back up to start some off piste tree skiing with the visibility poor. The upper lifts in Monetiere were closed for the day so we were told this was mostly the sector we were going to ski for the day. On the positive side, the level to which the trees rise definitely were as advertised. There was abundant tree skiing and plenty lining the pistes for viable storm weather skiing. The actual conditions within the trees was generally untracked and soft at the top but quickly became heavy and difficult to ski by the lower portions of the runs. I would imagine given the southern trajectory of the storms that come here from the Mediterranean that this is often the case. Nevertheless between the untracked nice stretches at the top and the pleasant run outs on the pistes it made for a nice morning .

PHOTO-2026-02-03-07-16-23.jpg



After lunch we headed up the prorel lift back towards Briancon where thankfully the visibility had improved. We then did a long off piste descent all the way down to the midstation of the prorel gondola. This route was when looking at the trailmap on the far left of the resort. The top section was excellent but once we hit the tree line it ultimately became difficult to navigate.

IMG_0587.jpg

For our last run of the day from the top of the gondola we began an off piste route skiiers left on the face near the aiguilette lift. We had told the guide that we wished to end the day in Briancon so we could walk back to the hotel. After an excellent top section that had not yet been touched, and a long and arduous tree section, we unfortunately wound right back up in Chantamerle.

IMG_0588.jpg


No big deal but the language barrier has been far more of an issue here than in previous trips elsewhere. No signs of Americans here and very little English to be heard other than a few Brits. Our legs were completely shot by the end of the day but given the visibility most of the day no complaints.

Day 3:

The gameplan was to drive to Monetiere to start the day as the hope was that the upper lifts at Cibouit and Yret would open as they were closed the previous days. After two excellent long (very!) and freshly groomed pisted runs on the Bachas chair we sadly discovered that the lifts were not going to open for the day. Apparently the visibility was too poor up top for them to do avalanche mitigation work that they needed to do to get the lifts open. We pivoted and took the Eychauda lift up towards the short Cucumelle lift where we did several off piste runs in untouched cold snow under the lift.

IMG_0589.jpg

Given the previous days long run outs in the heavy snow down below, these short laps were a welcome treat.

IMG_0590.jpg

We then spent several runs before lunch exploring the off piste options around the Vallons lift. First to the skiers left, a long traverse outward before skiing downward towards the lift. Untracked but becoming overly popular with several other guided groups. Quality snow. Next we did two 5/10 minute hikes towards the skiers right which was significantly less trafficked and provided excellent long powder, sustained pitch, and little competition. This was the stuff we came for. After lunch the guide suggested we hike high and skiers left off of the Vallons chair for roughly 20 minutes to get to Guibertes Couloir, a run that would take us down to the valley and likely take up much of the afternoon.

IMG_0591.jpg

As these guides tend to do, the time was well exaggerated and ultimately we were hiking and traversing for nearly an hour. We are not the fastest and I am sure frustrated our guide. His decision turned out to be excellent. While the clouds never disappeared for the day, the visibility was fair enough to enjoy the run fully. We skied essentially from peak to valley in an area no one had yet visited since the storm. I must admit after my experience in St Moritz last year I did not feel confident in doing this route on a level 4 day but no harm was done and for at least the top 80% of the run this was alps skiing at its finest. As with the rest of the day, the lower 20% became quite tedious but no complaints.

PHOTO-2026-02-04-10-14-50.jpg


Day 4:

Finally, the sun came out. And risk decreased from Level 4 to Level 3. It was forecasted to cloud up later in the day as snow was forecasted to move in overnight. Wanting to take advantage of the sun and hopeful that Yret would finally open, we drove again to Monetiere. The morning proved to be fantastic with our guide able to lead us 4/5 times down the Yret face through various lines, untouched, my kind of pitch, and no tedious runouts.



En route to lunch we took one final run off Yret, far skiers left into the bowl behind the face and down the far left boundary of Monetiere down through the trees until ultimately arriving back at the base area. An incredible run.

IMG_0680.jpg


After a long needed lunch we decided to hike from Vallons to the peak to the left when sitting on the lift. That led us to a wide couloir that had yet to be skid that day.

IMG_0679.jpg


PHOTO-2026-02-05-09-42-31.jpg


While the clouds had finally rolled in, it was a fitting end to one of the better days I have had in the alps.


Day 5:

As the week had progressed forecasts converged on another storm arriving Thursday night into Friday with roughly 5-7 inches predicted but with questionable snow levels. Given we had an 8 PM flight out of Milan and that our guide seemed confident that it would be a great choice for the day, we decided to go to Montgenevre so we could position ourselves a bit closer to the airport. Rain in Briancon Thursday night and modest snow totals and thick cloud out our window on Friday morning left us thinking at breakfast that the day might not be as good as hoped. We parked in the lot by the Charmettes lift where it was obvious that at least 10 inches had fell. Level 4/5 so our options might be limited. As we rode the lift up we were essentially in a white out. Thankfully the clouds wound up being low level and were hanging in the valley and by the top of the lift there were spots of sunshine and perfect visibility. We then boarded the Rocher de l’aigle gondola and what followed was some of the best powder skiing Ive ever experienced.

IMG_0681.jpg

We proceeded to do 5 different routes down from the top of the gondola through the L’aigle sector down to the Brousset chair. At the top open bowls, some couloirs near the gondola tower, in the middle open and undulating rollers, and at the bottom through the trees. Chris and Tony both mentioned this area in their trip reports. It was vast, long, mellow and completely untouched for nearly 4 straight hours. We then cruised down to Claviere and enjoyed a delicious Italian lunch before returning to Montgenevre and our car. This was a day I will remember forever and is something that simply would not be possible at American resorts. For essentially the same price of a full day lift ticket at a US resort, we got a lift ticket, shared guide, and a delicious Italian lunch all while on heli/cat like snow/terrain. And a special thanks to our guide who turned out to be quite the photographer.

IMG_0667.JPG

IMG_0665.JPG
IMG_0662.JPG
IMG_0649.JPG
IMG_0647.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0681.jpg
    IMG_0681.jpg
    363.4 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_0681.jpg
    IMG_0681.jpg
    363.4 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_0606.jpg
    IMG_0606.jpg
    179.7 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_0605.jpg
    IMG_0605.jpg
    474.7 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_0663.JPG
    IMG_0663.JPG
    122 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_0656.JPG
    IMG_0656.JPG
    49.2 KB · Views: 14
  • IMG_0655.JPG
    IMG_0655.JPG
    186.2 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_0648.JPG
    IMG_0648.JPG
    113.5 KB · Views: 12
He did. I couldn’t believe how well they turned out. Almost like we had a professional photographer with us. Any photos I took myself looked awful in comparison. It helped that the terrain was mostly mellow. I tense up in high/technical spots and this terrain lent itself to just letting it rip.
 
This trip belongs in the conversation with ours in Val d’Isere in 2018. :drool: And it’s Exhibit A of the value of hiring guides in the Alps, especially on powder days.
 
Solo is hard. We were 4. It basically worked out to 125 usd per person per day. Granted most people are not paying the day rate at any resort out west--but it still winds up being less per day to ski over there with the guide and lift ticket. And that is just comparing it to a regular day skiing. To get powder like that for that many laps in a row would require some sort of cat/heli operation which is astronomical in the states. I am going to Snowbird in March and staying at the inn--between flights from NY, lift tickets, hotel etc this trip to france was meaningfully less including the guide.
 
In hindsight the conditions we got were certainly very lucky but a lot of maneuvering went into the whole trip and maintaining our flexibility ultimately put is in a good position to get lucky. I am confined to these 5/6 day trips given I have young kids and most people in that situation would book a place in advanced and live with the result. We changed our flight from zurich to milan, postponed our trip by 5 days and did not choose a resort until the day before. I think skiing in the alps more so than the US requires luck but also a lot of flexibility and willingness to follow the weather/forecast.
 
in other threads we have been noting that costs to premier US West ski resorts are getting more out of whack with Europe every year lately. Stuart is even making this point on his stormski.com podcasts.

I wonder if and when enough East Coast skiers figure this out and move the needle on visitation numbers Alps vs. West.
 
Last edited:
I wonder if and when enough East Coast skiers figure this out and move the needle on visitation numbers Alps vs. West.
I've brought up many times in the past how many skiers I see on nonstops from JFK, EWR, PHL, etc. to Geneva, Zurich, and Milan -- and those are only the ones who dress in clothes or carry bootbags on the plane that identify them as such. My perception is obviously anecdotal so it would be interesting to get hard data on how many right coasters have already "figured this out" and head east on ski destination trips. Of course, it'll never be close for a number of reasons (the comfort of staying inside your home country at the top of the list); still, I believe that Alps visitation from the northeast is higher than we might assume.

I paid big bucks for my lodging in Chamonix and Switzerland, much more than I would pay in North America (...). The big bucks I paid would be equivalent if I stayed very close to chairlifts at places like Vail and Aspen, which I don't normally do.
My impression is that three or four star lodging convenient to lifts in Europe is far less expensive that in Colorado or Big Sky.
The only times I've stayed in four-star lodging in the Alps and North America were on junkets so Tony's in a better position to comment on pricing that he's encountered over the years. Of course, you can spend a mortgage payment per night in the Alps if so inclined (our friend Fraser at Snow-Wise would be happy to help you do that!); however, I strongly agree that the value equation is in Europe's favor, especially with half-board given how meals can run up costs. Our upcoming stay at a quiet 3ish-star place alongside one of the Innsbruck ski areas is $170/night half board (Indy Pass for lift tix, FF awards for flights, $220 for a rental car, approx. $60 for gas) so this is a budget excursion compared to what we'd pay in the States for a similar experience.

The convenience of jimk's situation in SLC will prevent him from flying to the Alps for anything other than bucket-list locations so I understand why he didn't go bargain hunting but as we've said dozens of times, it's relatively easy to find them over there as long as you avoid obvious peak periods and lodging at the bottom of global Top Ten ski attractions.
 
Impressive how the skier (is it @skiandgolfnut?) is kept in frame so nicely in this headcam clip. It's only mid-season but I think we can safely bestow a "best 2025-26 powder photos and videos" award for this report.
🏆

Tony and I were dreaming of these conditions when we skied there during a snow drought three years ago. It's a perfect place especially for me given my terrain preferences.
 
Its an expensive sport anyway you slice it. Made worse by living in NY. I ski with the kids as often as I can in the Berkshires which can provide some value but for the most part I am getting on a plane to ski one way or the other. Using Snowbird as an example, I have done it every which way. Cheaper hotels/Airbnb at the mouth of the canyon and drive up each day or sleep at the lifts (this year at the inn). Even in the instances where I stay down canyon, this trip to France inclusive of guide was cheaper. And as much as I love snowbird and staying in the canyon is a luxury, lets not pretend that the inn is half as charming as most 3/4 star for <200 a night youre getting in Europe. Nothing will ever compare to living in SLC or near a proper ski area but that dream will have to wait!

I think if you observed the JFK->SLC flight versus the JFK->Milan flight and tracked who "looked" like they might be a skier it would still be exponentially higher on the SLC route.
(is it @skiandgolfnut?)
:cool:
 
I take the position that anyone who has to get on airplane and pay for lodging can afford to consider guided skiing under the right circumstances. I was solo with Piste to Powder in the Arlberg in 2013 and 2 of the 4 days in Val d’Isere in 2018.

It is less easy now to get into a guided group in the Alps vs. hiring private now and it has always been difficult in Switzerland.

An expert skier on a tight budget can prioritize with cheaper lodging not on the hill and/or staying in an apartment and eating meals in instead of at restaurants.

Long ago on Mammoth Forum I divided skiers into 3 budgetary groups:
1) Those who live close enough to skiing to do most of it by daytrip from home, Harvey being FTO’s Exhibit A.
2) Those who drive to skiing but distances mean arranging lodging. SoCal skiers at Mammoth and many NYC and Boston skiers in Vermont are typical examples. Many of these skiers are zealous in driving down the lodging costs with season long group ski houses or finding some local connection, which I have had 3x at Mammoth covering over half my ski years there. My Snowbird timeshare fits this category too.
3) Those who have to fly. This may be a requirement for Sbooker but for vast numbers of people in Europe and a significant numbers in North America it is not. There are lots of people including several posting on FTO or their friends who really hate flying even if they can afford it and choose to ski exclusively in groups 1) or 2). Besides Harvey that would include MarzNC’s friend Bill and my friend Garry Klassen even though he worked for American Airlines!

A long list of US resorts chase the $$$ from group 3. Subsidizing the flights into remote ski town airports is the most obvious example. Just because you can afford to fly doesn't automatically mean that you will also pay up for luxe lodging (I'm raising my hand here!), but those categories are surely positively correlated.
 
Back
Top