Tuckerman Ravine, NH: 04/09/06

riverc0il

New member
Four months ago, if you would have told me I would be climbing up Hillman's Highway in April, I would have called you crazy! But the elbow came through! Barely.

Driving through Jefferson on Route 2 passing by people ascending the stairs to their houses of worship, I spotted the white caked peaks of the Northern Presidentials dead ahead. While the faithful of small town northern New England filled into their neighborhood churches, the skiing faithful of New England descended upon the Mecca of backcountry in New Hampshire.

My church is the snow covered mountains and the stairs leading up to the church are skin tracks. I worship the snow and get down on my hands and knees to pray when I am ascending the steep boot ladders. My deity of choice is the Earth which brought me here and can take me out when ever it deems I have had my time to enjoy life. At which point I will rejoin the Earth and have my ashes dumped out across the mountains I worship. Today would not be that day though.

This morning dawned Blue Bird without a cloud in the sky. The evening's Radiational Cooling had me worried the snow would harden up too much, but temperatures soaring into the upper forties and lower fifties assured I need not worry about the snow not being soft enough. Avi reports came in low for the entire bowl, it was on.

Arriving at Pinkham just before 9 A.M., I was surprised to find a spot in the lot. Apparently, a lot of folks made the wrong call today! It was decision time and I choose Hillman?s Highway over the Gulf of Slides due to a few factors, not least of which included not having a partner. But I wanted to see the bowl today, it has been too long?

Skinning up the first quarter mile of the TRT was? interesting. Lots of rocks showing and water bars not filled in. I stepped right up and over the rocks with my skis on. At first the thin cover slowed me down slightly, but after the first quarter mile, the snow pack was solid and I was flying right past people looking at me and my skins incredulously (?Care to swap packs?? asked one fellow). Look for the bottom quarter mile of the TRT to be hiking only later this week and definitely by next weekend given the excellent weather rolling in.

First views of The Bowl at HoJo?s were exceptional given the Blue Bird weather. All the main routes were filled in very well considering the type of season we have had. The conga line was already ascending The Lip, Sluice, and likely every other invisible Gully in the Ravine, but only a handful of skiers ascending Hillman?s per usual. Why people insist on skiing the Ravine proper all the time when Hillman?s offering such an awesome experience away from the crowds is beyond me. I took my time, ate some lunch, and got ready to tackle Hillman?s Highway.

After the skin over, I prepped for the climb. My confidence in the boot ladder has been substantially bolstered compared to last year due to a few factors including experience, a better rest step, slower pace, and a vibram sole on my new AT boots. Walk mode also allowed the legs to stretch a little better during the climb as well. Given the improvements, I still don?t have much muscle strength or stamina! Yet again, I conked out at the gully split around the three-quarters mark. Given the Blue Bird sky and perfect weather, I really wanted to get to the top of that gully. I even had thoughts of skinning over to the cone and seeing what the snowfields had to offer. But alas, it was not to be. On top of the legs being shaky, my right elbow was beginning to fatigue and was providing me with a slightly painful throbbing. Enough factors to make me realize yet again that there is always next week. So I clicked in and dropped in from three the gully spilt.

Coverage was unbelievable in the gully allowing the ability to arc some huge turns with no chance of going end to end without traversing. The snow did not corn up despite the warmth, but it was relatively soft. I would call it slightly corned slab conditions, if you would. Frozen balls of snow rained down from above when ever someone in the gully made a turn or came to stop. Turns took a lot of effort and the snow tried to buck you forward and backward. Nothing extremely challenging, but certainly kept you on your toes and made you work for your turns. All and all, an excellent run.

I debated hiking up the Lower Snowfields after a brief rest but my legs and right elbow were having no part in that plan. Body parts all over were begging for mercy, so I showed them none by heading right for the Sherburne without a break :twisted: In my recent report on Saddleback, I called the glade trail ?Intimidator? the most aptly named ski area trail in New England. Well, as any one knows that has skied it, the ?Sure-Burn? is perhaps the most aptly named Backcountry trail in New England.

The Sherburne skied like butter where it was sunny and scraped like frozen granular McSludge in the shade. Obviously, snow in the sun was preferred. The top three quarters of the Sherburne skied great! Occasionally some small bumps, but fairly flat for the most part. Not many issues with rocks or coverage, just fantastic overall. The last quarter of the trail was a different story. Things started getting a little thin at the one quarter remaining section with occasional sections of only half the coverage remaining (you guessed it! The half in the shade). Just thin enough to make things interesting. However, the last quarter mile of the trail was toast. Some of us adventurous spirits skied over some grass, rocks, and sludge trying to link snow patches, but eventually it was time to saddle up the skis and hoof it. Look for the bottom quarter mile of the trail to roped off by tomorrow I would bet and the bottom quarter of the trail should likely be roped by next weekend.

An outstanding morning and afternoon in some of New England?s finest backcountry. My elbow performed beyond expectations but still left me hurting by the end of the day. That is acceptable considering only a few months ago I doubted I would have enough arm strength to perform such a climb. Got to work on the leg strength and stamina issues though! So close but so far just is not acceptable, especially on a day like today.

Northern Presidentials from Lancaster, NH.
 

Attachments

  • 040906tuckerman06.jpg
    040906tuckerman06.jpg
    50.4 KB · Views: 4,200
  • 040906tuckerman05.jpg
    040906tuckerman05.jpg
    57.7 KB · Views: 4,188
  • 040906tuckerman04.jpg
    040906tuckerman04.jpg
    57.7 KB · Views: 4,195
  • 040906tuckerman03.jpg
    040906tuckerman03.jpg
    36.3 KB · Views: 4,194
  • 040906tuckerman02.jpg
    040906tuckerman02.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 4,188
  • 040906tuckerman01.jpg
    040906tuckerman01.jpg
    51.9 KB · Views: 4,189
Just wanted to add one comment. Worst part of the day? Listening to a dog whimppering and howling at the bottom of Hillman's Highway. Some guy tied the leash to a tree while he headed up for a run. Given one of my previous climbs up Hillman's, I almost got hit by a dog running down the gully straight at me so I appreciate the skier not taking his dog up the gully! But the dog obviously was not happy to be there. I had to listen to that whippering for 5-10 minutes while I adjusted my skis and pack for climbing. [-X
 

Attachments

  • 040906tuckerman13.jpg
    040906tuckerman13.jpg
    49.8 KB · Views: 4,179
  • 040906tuckerman12.jpg
    040906tuckerman12.jpg
    55.3 KB · Views: 4,182
  • 040906tuckerman11.jpg
    040906tuckerman11.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 4,185
  • 040906tuckerman10.jpg
    040906tuckerman10.jpg
    48.2 KB · Views: 4,187
  • 040906tuckerman09.jpg
    040906tuckerman09.jpg
    49.5 KB · Views: 4,180
  • 040906tuckerman08.jpg
    040906tuckerman08.jpg
    36.4 KB · Views: 4,190
  • 040906tuckerman07.jpg
    040906tuckerman07.jpg
    50.5 KB · Views: 4,193
Nice! Looks so nice. I really look forward to trying hillmans soon. Defiantly nice to avoid that god awful hike inbetween hojos and the bowl, that thing is the worst with plastic soled alpine boots. When are you going up again, I'm trying to drag my dad up tuesday because it looks like it is going to be a perfect day.

Oh, yeah check this out. That storm did a bunch for the cover in the bowl:

Your pics from april 9th:
040906tuckerman03.jpg


My pic from march 31st:
P1010197.JPG


I have never been to Tux before this year but I would say from what I have seen in pics the coverage in the bowl looks about average. Which is quite awsome for such a bad snowfall year.
 
And last year on the same day:

041005tuckerman03.jpg


However, my other pics from that day also show the Lower Snow fields were more filled in and of course, the Sherburne was skiing top to bottom (it was still 1/3 open as of May 1st last year as well, which isn't happening this year).

That said, even though the Bowl looks better this year compared to last year and your March 31st picture, the Avi report attests that looks are deceiving cravases have already opened up and the new snow just hid some of the junk. I think it definitely helped, but I ain't gonna get July in this year, that is for damn sure!
 
riverc0il":3fqvafyw said:
However, my other pics from that day also show the Lower Snow fields were more filled in and of course, the Sherburne was skiing top to bottom (it was still 1/3 open as of May 1st last year as well, which isn't happening this year).

That said, even though the Bowl looks better this year compared to last year and your March 31st picture, the Avi report attests that looks are deceiving cravases have already opened up and the new snow just hid some of the junk. I think it definitely helped, but I ain't gonna get July in this year, that is for damn sure!

Yeah, I get what your saying on the snow cover in other locations... but I was talking just about the bowl.
The summit of Mt. Washington is +42.5 in snowfall this year. I'm not sure about pinkham but it must be way below normal. So I think the farther you go up the mountain the closer to average the snowpack is. I know it has rained a lot this year, but Tux will do better with an high rain/high snowfall year then other areas that don't get as much blow in. Let me put this into a situation:

Lets say one year there is a lot of rain and snow. In one week they get a foot of snow then an inch of rain. The sherbie will start of with a foot then after the rain lets say they have 4 inches of snow left on the ground. Places like little headwall and lower snowfields got hypothetically 2 ft so now there down to 16 inches. The bowl got 4 ft, so its only down to 40 inches.

Now in year two there was slightly below normal snowfall but not much rain. So lets say they had a week with 8 inches of snow but no rain. So the sherbie will have 8 inches and stay at 8 because there was no melt. So the sherbie will end up having double as much snow as year 1. The lower snowfields and the little headwall will be at 16 inches the same as year one. But the bowl will only be at 32 in this year vs. the 40 inches of the year with the rain.

So to sum this very confusing nonsensical ramble, I would like to say that I am a dork for writing all of that. :lol:
 
Nice TR, Riv! I'm tied up with work and PT this week, but Friday looks REALLY good for GOS, or whatever else is in our sights.

Thanks for the stoke
 
awf170":1kh5viaq said:
riverc0il":1kh5viaq said:
However, my other pics from that day also show the Lower Snow fields were more filled in and of course, the Sherburne was skiing top to bottom (it was still 1/3 open as of May 1st last year as well, which isn't happening this year).

That said, even though the Bowl looks better this year compared to last year and your March 31st picture, the Avi report attests that looks are deceiving cravases have already opened up and the new snow just hid some of the junk. I think it definitely helped, but I ain't gonna get July in this year, that is for damn sure!

Yeah, I get what your saying on the snow cover in other locations... but I was talking just about the bowl.
The summit of Mt. Washington is +42.5 in snowfall this year. I'm not sure about pinkham but it must be way below normal. So I think the farther you go up the mountain the closer to average the snowpack is. I know it has rained a lot this year, but Tux will do better with an high rain/high snowfall year then other areas that don't get as much blow in. Let me put this into a situation:

Lets say one year there is a lot of rain and snow. In one week they get a foot of snow then an inch of rain. The sherbie will start of with a foot then after the rain lets say they have 4 inches of snow left on the ground. Places like little headwall and lower snowfields got hypothetically 2 ft so now there down to 16 inches. The bowl got 4 ft, so its only down to 40 inches.

Now in year two there was slightly below normal snowfall but not much rain. So lets say they had a week with 8 inches of snow but no rain. So the sherbie will have 8 inches and stay at 8 because there was no melt. So the sherbie will end up having double as much snow as year 1. The lower snowfields and the little headwall will be at 16 inches the same as year one. But the bowl will only be at 32 in this year vs. the 40 inches of the year with the rain.

So to sum this very confusing nonsensical ramble, I would like to say that I am a dork for writing all of that. :lol:

Anyone want to answer and tell me that what I getting at makes sense or that I'm a total idiot. :lol: Or is it just confusing that no one understood it.
 
it fills in differently every year for a variety of conditions, so it is kinda hard to generalize, especially in relation to the sherbie since sherbie depends 100% on actual snowfall whereas tucks gets the blow in factor where wind can be just as important as total snow fall. also, it is less likely to rain at higher elevation whereas sherbie is much more prone to rain in that 2k-4k verts locale that a lot of regular ski areas deal with. suffice to say the bowl can certainly withstand a bad snow year better than the sherbie for a variety of reasons, i think it is kinda hard to make a correlation since the factors are so variable though.
 
The principle of the analysis is correct. Tucks is more sensitive to total precip (which is a higher proportion of snow) while Sherbourne (and lift-served NE areas) are more sensitive to temperature.

Here's a western counterpart example from this season. Through Dec. 31 Tahoe was plagued with warm storms. Squaw Valley season snow was 119 inches at 8,200 ft. but only 41 inches at 6,200 feet (34% of the upper total) where there was lots of rain. During the recent epic March Squaw had 194 inches at 8,200 ft. and 128 inches (66% of the upper total) at 6,200 ft. The March storms were cold and there was little if any rain even at low elevation.

I would expect Tucks to have substantial year-to-year variation based upon wind deposition, as I have observed over the years at Mammoth. Before this year 1992-93 was the record year for snowfall at Mammoth, but I can tell you that 1983 and 1995 had noticeably more snow on the ground.
 
Back
Top