Then you be missing out. VT could end up with 30 inches by then.Admin":im5vsvf6 said:LOL. Not to mention that it's in the Northeast. ;-) I'm actually flying to New England on Saturday but I won't be bringing any ski gear.
Beats no density wind driven dirt.jasoncapecod":2ui4yf3j said:25" of high density wind driven snow , doesn't get you all hot and bothered ??
jasoncapecod":1pe0qknb said:25" of high density wind driven snow , doesn't get you all hot and bothered ??
kingslug":3cd0jpgg said:I've lugged my skis for a 3 day getaway to Utah for a long time.
That's trail acreage of 500 or so at Stowe. JSpin will remind us that Stowe is 2,500 acres boundary to boundary. In terms of ski reality, I believe Stowe skis about like a 1,500 acre western area. The local woodchucks will say I'm too conservative with that estimate.kingslug":10r1jwh5 said:And, Stowe and Alta have about the same vertical. Although Alta has 5 times the acreage. Western folk might feel a bit claustrophobic.
When Stowe first instituted their boundary-to-boundry policy, iirc they said it equated to about 1200 acres of skiable terrain. They did some sort of guesstimation to remove cliffs and the numerous ever tangled, essentially impenetrable sections of woods.Tony Crocker":2g92l7ug said:That's trail acreage of 500 or so at Stowe. JSpin will remind us that Stowe is 2,500 acres boundary to boundary. In terms of ski reality, I believe Stowe skis about like a 1,500 acre western area. The local woodchucks will say I'm too conservative with that estimate.