Ischgl, Austria, Feb.1-2, 2017

Tony Crocker

Administrator
Staff member
After 2 weeks of dry weather in the Alps we decided to take a break to start the third week the third week, spending Jan. 28-30 in Venice. If the dry weather continued we could spend a day admiring the Dolomite scenery while skiing among the1,000km of entirely manmade snow. Then we would move on to Ischgl, which has the best reputation for snow preservation in Austria.

On the 4.5 hour drive from Saalbach to Venice I browsed online to see If I could get a good online deal to replace my Blizzard Bonafides, and it turned out an Italian site https://www.nencinisport.it/en/ had them for 419 Euros, a far better price than I could find on a US site. The catch was that NenciniSport would only ship in Europe, so I reserved Feb. 1-2 at the Hotel Sonne in Ischgl and had the skis sent there.

While in Venice the weather changed and a moderate storm hit the northern Alps Jan. 31. This was a relatively warm storm so rained to 5,500 feet, which likely trashed the surfaces at the areas we skied our second week. But 90% of Ischgl’s skiing is above 6,500 so at least a foot of snow there. We drove back to Austria on Jan. 31 and spend the night in Landeck, then got up the next morning and drove the last half hour to Ischgl. We arrived at the Hotel Sonne about 10AM in fog and drizzle, and fortunately they let us check in early.

IschglMap.jpg

We decided to go out for a half day Wednesday at 12:30 to get oriented for what would was expected to be a clearing day on Thursday. Light was flat and avy report high so only tested powder next to pistes. With the high rain/snow line new snow was cement, not the fluff of 2 weeks ago. Thus powder was very tough skiing unless completely untracked, plus I’m no longer on skis with rockered tips to float more easily over the heavy snow.

We rode the Fimba gondola to Idalp and first skied busy blue pistes off the B2 and B1 lifts. We moved to C2 where I first tested the heavy powder near the piste. We then rode the D2 to Palinkopf and skied the long black piste 30 with a bit of a break in the light to the base of the E lifts. This convinced me that the E sector was where we wanted to start skiing Thursday.

We went back through Idalp and rode the B8, skiing pistes 5 and 1a to the base. Down low the drizzle had softened the snow to a pleasant and not too heavy spring consistency. Liz remarked that she had occasionally seen this in the Northeast. We skied 11,900 vertical and have no pics worth posting Wednesday due to the weather.

On Thursday we arrived at Idalp on the Fimba gondola to see what James calls the “Grand Central Station” of Austrian skiing.
IMG_8355.JPG

Skier density around Idalp is chronically high with so many high speed lifts. Samnaun on the Swiss side has an analogous but not as extreme concentration of lifts/people in the Marmotte area.
IMG_8382.JPG

But I’m guessing today was an extreme example
1) Lots of people out yesterday due to new snow and bad weather prior 2 days.
2) Low altitude places got rain from the storm so maybe some flexible people went for the place that got snow.
3) The Euros stick to the pistes, and with still low tide conditions off piste perhaps even more so this week.

But I don't care if areas have "grand central stations" as long as they also have outlying sectors within more wilderness ambience. Areas as expansive as Ischgl have many, so we skied the 38 piste to the E sector.
IMG_8357.JPG


This was one of the few days of our trip with any wind, but it was mainly on the ridgelines like at the top of E2 here.
IMG_8358.JPG


Ischgl had lots of Gasex installations, but even more of these taller towers in similar locations.
IMG_8362a.JPG

Anyone know what they do?

The E4 lift covers about 2,500 vertical and with good coverage would be great off piste playground, a mellower version of Zermatt’s Hohtalli.
IMG_8372.JPG


I followed a low angle line near the lift where I had observed a small guided group while riding the chair.
IMG_8366.JPG

IMG_8368.JPG


My second E4 run was to skier’s right and Liz took some pics.
P2020316a.JPG

P2020321a.JPG

I’m surprised to see that much spray because the snow was a lot of work and I took a few rest breaks on these runs.

On the last time up E4 we branched off to the long scenic 80 piste which drops 2,900 vertical to Samnaun in Switzerland.
P2030335.JPG


Halfway down, the run has been alongside a narrow gully which presumably absorbs most of the potential slide activity.
IMG_8377.JPG

IMG_8379.JPG


Samnaun is higher than Ischgl but there is just a tram to get back up above tree line. In Samnaun we checked out the N2 and M2 lifts with some remaining powder but also some flat and thin spots, including one that put a core shot in one of my K2 Recons. We took Samnaun N4 to the D1 lift that reaches the Austrian border at the 9,420 foot Greitspitze high point of skiing. I skied some tracked powder near the lift while Liz skied Piste 72.

We returned to Austria via piste 13, which had filled with windsift on its skier’s left. It was now about 3:30 so this busy day we took pistes 12, 3 and 37 to the Fimba mid-station to avoid a likely crush on the 1 and 1a runs to the base. We skied 14,900 vertical at Ischgl, 9,400 at Samnaun, about 6K of heavy powder.
 
file.php


https://www.wyssenavalanche.com/wp-cont ... ontrol.pdf

The pic above shows both a Gasex and a Wyssen tower. The deployment box on top of the Wyssen tower has only 12 explosive charges, so the boxes need to be replaced a few times during the season when weather is clear. The idea is to have a full box present during bad weather so the control work can occur throughout a storm and not allow an increasing hazard to accumulate. By radio control, a charge is dropped from the box on a line to explode 1-3 meters above the snow surface for maximum avalanche triggering effect. Those metal poles on top of the deployment boxes are guides to ease pickup and removal of the boxes by helicopter.

James brought this to my attention after Jim Steenburgh (on sabbatical in Austria) skied Ischgl's closing day and made the same inquiry about the Wyssen tower that I did in 2017.
 
Tony Crocker":12shbsu2 said:
The pic above shows both a Gasex and a Wyssen tower.
Never heard of a Wyssen tower and have never noticed one in the places I've skied. Thanks for the explanation. What's interesting in Steenburgh's article is that he didn't believe the towers to be avalanche mitigation devices because they didn't appear to be positioned in areas he deemed susceptible to slides.
 
jamesdeluxe":3frpgxi8 said:
Never heard of a Wyssen tower and have never noticed one in the places I've skied.

Ditto.

Though even Colorado (roads, not ski areas) have Gasex systems in places now. Thus there are certain roads that are unlikely to have large avi's any more. Though I highly doubt too many more installations for the proverbial once in a hundred years avi cycle we had last season. Supposedly even a D5 sized one over by Aspen which is pretty much unheard of in the continental US.
 
EMSC":4j1lhgqd said:
Thus there are certain roads that are unlikely to have large avi's any more. Though I highly doubt too many more installations for the proverbial once in a hundred years avi cycle we had last season. Supposedly even a D5 sized one over by Aspen which is pretty much unheard of in the continental US.
Those one in a hundred year cycles are being broken annually at an ever increasing and alarming rate thanks to global climate change (which unfortunately the scientifically illiterate still believe is a hoax).
 
Marc_C":3t7ucxje said:
Those one in a hundred year cycles are being broken annually at an ever increasing and alarming rate thanks to global climate change (which unfortunately the scientifically illiterate still believe is a hoax).

Good luck with that argument. By definition, you can have a "100 year event" multiple years in a row and still be 100% within the weather norms.
 
Back
Top