I do not know any other geography in North America where the snow level fluctuates constantly.
Everywhere in western North America the snow level fluctuates constantly. But for most places it rarely reaches the base of ski resorts. In the Pacific States from SoCal to Alyeska it often reaches at least the base of many ski resorts.
The table I published compares the relative risks of those resorts.
The Alps have even more exposure to fluctuating snow levels because the altitude range of their ski resorts is much greater. Only the inner core of the Alps has rain immunity comparable to the Rocky Mountains.
New England/Northeast snow is more influenced by the storm track, which will determine if the resorts receive all rain, a mix, or heavy snow.
Yes. I think among the world's ski regions, that's an unusual pattern. The only other one that comes to mind is Japan's midwinter concentrated "Lake Effect." New Zealand and South America are just like western North America and Australia with sensitivity to fluctuating snow levels based upon altitude and latitude.
@Patrick is clearly the go-to source for North Americans who want to ski in the southern hemisphere.
My first skiing outside the US was in NZ in 1982, then again in 1997. Post divorce I skied in the Southern Hemisphere in 2005, 2006 and 2007. My Southern Hemisphere skiing tailed off just as Patrick's was beginning.
Towns outside the [Aussie] resorts price difference might not be that great.
Jindabyne was reasonable in 1997 even though lift tickets were expensive. Hopefully that has not changed much. I knew about Australia's snow unreliability before I went there with Adam's choir tour. The
Aussie Ski Forum was already very active and I had also found the Spencer's Creek data by then. I consider myself lucky with the mid-July conditions I experienced at Thredbo, low tide but nice surfaces.
2005 in Las Lenas was degraded by the A-Factor: less than ideal rental skis plus Marte open one day instead of 3 because they were slow in excavating the lift from a storm the week prior to mine. I returned in 2015 and finally got to ski some of the terrain that I should not be skiing now in my 70's.
2006 was a subsidized NASJA trip to Queenstown with the only uniformly excellent conditions of my 4 NZ ski trips.
2007 in Chile had its highlights but conditions were variable due to zero new snow in the prior 3 weeks, a far from uncommon situation there.
In 2010 I was hosted for a few days by
Black Diamond Safaris in New Zealand. I was "in the neighborhood" following an Tahiti eclipse cruise.
All of you know about the bucket list ski cruise to Antarctica in 2011.
In 2014 Liz and I were researching an ambitious 3+ week road safari in South America but scrubbed it when the season started poorly.
I’m pretty free to travel the 8 months that I’m not coaching.
Considering what the other 4 months are, that's still a huge hit to quality of skiing available.
But we all have our eccentric priorities, as evidenced by our detour to Afriski a year ago.
I suspect we are done with Southern Hemisphere skiing aside from scoring Liz' 7th continent after the July 2028 eclipse. I have 26 southern ski areas, though 6 of them were ski touring in Antarctica.
I found this article today about
aging skiers which definitely hit home. I have commented before about following Garry Klassen's path of being more particular about what snow conditions I'm willing to ski as I get older. Fringe destinations like Uzbekistan this past February are only on the agenda if I'm "in the neighborhood" for other reasons.