Correction: it's in the interview. See the last paragraph below.It's possible that a key line from the interview for NY Ski Blog ended up on the cutting-room floor.
Correction: it's in the interview. See the last paragraph below.It's possible that a key line from the interview for NY Ski Blog ended up on the cutting-room floor.
You want to title an interview? You write it!Yes. But the title?!
I encourage anyone with the slightest interest in the subject to review Roger's concisely summarized home page. I'll note that among the 12 people with the most ski areas, only 3 have also counted lifts. I count lots of stuff but it never occurred to me to count lifts until this thread. I used to count a running total of ski lift vertical each ski day before I got the Vertech watch in 1995.I am still on my 5 week ski road trip, but will definitely explore Worldskitraveller's blog when I get some time.
When we were chasing the fresher snow in Ports du Soleil and Grand Massif, Jimmy and his girlfriend were in the far southwest Alps at the places that got the most snow mid-season. He mentioned several places I do not recall and said his ski area count is still rising into the mid-700s.Your “village” definition is a bit more nebulous. For example, on March 29 we skied the Swiss side of Portes du Soleil. Would you count Champery, Les Crosets, Champoussin and Morgins as 4 areas? Here’s another example. Beaver Creek built connected separate lodging bases at Bachelor Gulch and Arrowhead. Does calling them villages (which they do!) somehow turn Beaver Creek into 3 ski areas? Our final Euro stop was Grand Massif, where we stayed in Flaine. I counted that as 2 areas due to lift ticket options of Flaine alone, 4 Villages alone or Grand Massif combined. We skied to Les Carroz 1500, Morillon 1100 and Samoens 1600, but not Les Carroz 1200, Morillon 700, Samoens 700/800 or Sixt 760. How would you count that can of worms?
His initiative was titled Project 101, meaning 101 ski areas, ergo the title of the interview. I appreciate how much you and ChrisC have engaged with this story and your protests have been duly noted but come on.From both James' interview and Roger's own website, it was clear to me that @Worldskitraveller's priority is collecting lifts not ski areas. Accordingly, I agree with James that Roger's priority is upfront and crystal clear but also with ChrisC that the title should be changed.

That is our view as well. Most Euro ski areas have enough scale that we rarely repeat a run at a new place unless conditions are exceptional. That mostly means fresh powder. This is a key critique of prioritizing lifts vs. ski areas. Some places have immense terrain variety from a single lift. That was why @Worldskitraveller completely missed the boat at Stowe. Even Baldy's Thunder Mt. is an excellent example of high variety from one lift. On the right day you could spend all of it just lapping Zermatt's Gant-Hohtalli tram as snowbirdsurfer was fortunate to do a week after we were not. @Worldskitraveller's antithesis would be the Squallywood fanatics who only ski KT-22.I just never felt I really 'skied' an area until I visited most of its lift sectors/ski terrain pods. Often led me back to ski places again.
The interview is posted on Harvey's website so it's up to him to change the title of the piece.We are taking the cue of the what the title should be from the horse's mouth.
It's possible that a key line from the interview for NY Ski Blog ended up on the cutting-room floor. He clarified that he's not really a ski-area collector but rather a lift collector. You can't say that he's dishonest or disingenuous.
You want to title an interview? You write it!
He's skiing at Ischgl's end-of-season event this weekend with the huge concert at Idalp headlined by Christina Aguilera. I requested photos along with a final tally of the ski areas he visited in 2025-26.Roger's priority is upfront and crystal clear

the huge concert at Idalp
Lift collectors TOP in state/providence itinerary - conditions permittingWe are taking the cue of the what the title should be from the horse's mouth.
That is our view as well. Most Euro ski areas have enough scale that we rarely repeat a run at a new place unless conditions are exceptional. That mostly means fresh powder. This is a key critique of prioritizing lifts vs. ski areas. Some places have immense terrain variety from a single lift. That was why @Worldskitraveller completely missed the boat at Stowe. Even Baldy's Thunder Mt. is an excellent example of high variety from one lift. On the right day you could spend all of it just lapping Zermatt's Gant-Hohtalli tram as snowbirdsurfer was fortunate to do a week after we were not. @Worldskitraveller's antithesis would be the Squallywood fanatics who only ski KT-22.
Lift collectors TOP in state/providence itinerary - conditions permitting
Plunge (T-ride)
KT-22 (SVU)
John Paul Jones (Snowbasin)
Sublett (JH)
Peak or showcase (WB)
Golden Eagle (KH)... other contenders include Stoke and the sleeper Goat's Eye
Zephyr (NY)
4runner (VT)
Gant (Zermatt)
Celo Alto (Cervinia)
Indren (MR)
Jump in with additions/corrections!
An interesting note is that the closing-day concert used to be a free extra until last season; however, day ticket buyers now have no choice but to pay a mandatory ski/concert bundle of €165 unless you have an Ikon Pass. But hey, if 19,000 people attend, apparently that's the "correct" price according to supply and demand. You almost have to admire the flagrant money-grubbing!
That explains @Worldskitraveller's totally misleading comments about Stowe after presumably riding the Forerunner quad only once. What really takes the cake is being close to ends-of-the-earth Mt. Bohemia and passing up a 2 foot powder day there to stay on his molehill tour schedule.I would never stop at Mad River Glen in the middle of an exceptional day for only an hour to ride the Single Chair and Sunnyside double, and then take off?! Do you know how rare the conditions were when he visited a lot of ski areas in the Northeast?
How many times are you going toWhat really takes the cake is being close to ends-of-the-earth Mt. Bohemia and passing up a 2 foot powder day there to stay on his molehill tour schedule.
? WST didn't come here to do what you want or expect him to. He was here to drive across the country and
at Patrick for over a decade now. I believe that in indulging the eccentricities we need to avoid the "tail wags the dog" situation. In April 2018 we stayed put in Val d'Isere for 11 days due to fabulous conditions even though at that time we had not yet skied anywhere else in the Tarantaise. Thus my criticism of Patrick has not been about what he's doing in the northern summer; it's what he's NOT doing in the northern winter in order to support The Streak.This is his first year living at Gore and skiing 100 days. He was served a steady diet of powder through February, of which we westerners could be quite envious. Will he still do that in an eastern season like 2012 or 2016? He won't have to ski "industrial resorts." As I've noted before, he could be very happy at a bunch of interior NW or Canadian areas with similar ambience to what he likes best in the East.why Harvey stays in NYS and doesn't make the easy hop over the border to the Eastern Townships or northern Vermont.
He never presented it as anything other than trying to step foot in as many ski areas and riding on as many lifts as possible (no need to FIFY, he tracks both as reflected in the original title of his trip: "Project 101") with no preference to biggest, best, snowiest, best preservation, etc. This is absolutely not how I would spend my time (for example, leaving MRG on a top-shelf day was brutal to behold); however, it clearly makes him happy so who am I to say that he "should" instead do this or that based on my preferences.I think ChrisC and I were set off by @Worldskitraveller's trip because it was presented as "Collecting Ski Areas," which sounded like our own priorities. No North American skier gets anywhere close to 300 ski areas without making that some level of priority and putting some sustained effort into it.
Harvey hates flying and is perfectly content going exclusively to NYS ski areas, where he scores a good percentage of powder days; however, I enjoy long-haul destination travel to "James ski areas" too much. Regardless, I 'm not going to say that he "should" do this or that based on my preferences.As I've noted before, [@Harvey] could be very happy at a bunch of interior NW or Canadian areas with similar ambience to what he likes best in the East.
I'd argue that this is the most egregious tail-wagging-the-dog situation of all (in some ways even nuttier than WST). Regardless, if that's how he derives enjoyment -- flying to Timbuktu to ski in likely subpar conditions predicated purely on the month -- hey, go with god. Moreover, including far-flung indoor ski areas constitutes blatant cheating on the streak's premise but it's his streak to violate or revise at his whim. He's not making any money off it so who cares? Once again, who am I to say that he "should" do this or that with his time and money based on my preferences?We have beenat Patrick for over a decade now. I believe that in indulging the eccentricities we need to avoid the "tail wags the dog" situation.
He never presented it as anything other than trying to step foot in as many ski areas and riding on as many lifts as possible (no need to FIFY, he tracks both as reflected in the original title of his trip: "Project 101")