From both James' interview and Roger's own website, it was clear to me that
@Worldskitraveller's priority is collecting lifts not ski areas. Accordingly, I agree with James that Roger's priority is upfront and crystal clear but also with ChrisC that the title should be changed.
On March 3 I said:
I am still on my 5 week ski road trip, but will definitely explore Worldskitraveller's blog when I get some time.
I encourage anyone with the slightest interest in the subject to review Roger's concisely summarized
home page. I'll note that among the 12 people with the most ski areas, only 3 have also counted lifts. I count lots of stuff but it never occurred to me to count lifts until this thread. I used to count a running total of ski lift vertical each ski day before I got the Vertech watch in 1995.
I was naturally lured further into the
World Council of Skitistics. I was pleased to say that my independent formulation of what counts as a ski area (generally agreed by other FTO posters too) conforms quite closely to the World Council of Skitistics. Specifically, separate discounted one area lift tickets (Portes du Soleil) must have geography defining separate ski areas, and the same for areas with a lift but no ski connection (Arosa-Lenzerheide).
I have browsed Jimmy's Skiing around the World books numerous times for so many countries, but must confess I never read his skiday/ski area definitions on pp. 23-25 of volume 2 until I read Roger's home page mention of it.
Jimmy has a very loose definition applied to Euro ski villages, counting all of them unless they have the same name such as Les Arcs and Courchevel do with different numbers based upon elevation. I sent him the following e-mail to clarify his view (no response yet):
Your “village” definition is a bit more nebulous. For example, on March 29 we skied the Swiss side of Portes du Soleil. Would you count Champery, Les Crosets, Champoussin and Morgins as 4 areas? Here’s another example. Beaver Creek built connected separate lodging bases at Bachelor Gulch and Arrowhead. Does calling them villages (which they do!) somehow turn Beaver Creek into 3 ski areas? Our final Euro stop was Grand Massif, where we stayed in Flaine. I counted that as 2 areas due to lift ticket options of Flaine alone, 4 Villages alone or Grand Massif combined. We skied to Les Carroz 1500, Morillon 1100 and Samoens 1600, but not Les Carroz 1200, Morillon 700, Samoens 700/800 or Sixt 760. How would you count that can of worms?
When we were chasing the fresher snow in Ports du Soleil and Grand Massif, Jimmy and his girlfriend were in the far southwest Alps at the places that got the most snow mid-season. He mentioned several places I do not recall and said his ski area count is still rising into the mid-700s.
I would question the Skitistics comments on sand skiing and ski touring. I think a ski day needs to be on snow (most of our FTO crowd agrees). I have 17 countries but could add 3 more with liberal definition of sand. I rode sand dunes standing on a board at Siwa Oasis in Egypt
https://bestsnow.net/TRsFTO/20060329EgyptEclipse.html , sitting on a sled in Dunhuang in China
https://bestsnow.net/TRsFTO/20080801ChinaEclipse.html , and prone on a toboggan in Namibia
https://www.firsttracksonline.com/boards/threads/skeleton-coast-namibia-june-25-27-2024.15029/ . Perhaps a strict requirement of using ski equipment would weed out most marginal cases like mine.
Ski touring I’m more liberal than Jimmy and Skitistics. Surely broad sectors (not specific itineraries) should count as a ski area (eg. Tioga Pass, Mt. Shasta, etc.). 15 of my 297 areas are exclusively ski touring, 7 of those on the 2011 Antarctic trip.