Fairmont Hot Springs, Feb. 22, 2026

Tony Crocker

Administrator
Staff member
Yes there is a ski area there, not just the hot spring. Stuart chose to ski there one of the days on his first (?) trip to interior B.C. Lonnie visited lots of extremely obscure areas like this on his western road trips in 2012-2023. So what was I doing there?
1) I stayed overnight in the immediate area.
2) It's on Indy Pass, so free.
3) I deliberately did not want to expend much effort the day before 3 days of cat skiing at Island Lake.
4) I had to be out of the hotel 11AM but Island Lake check in 2+ hours drive was at 5PM.

Expectations were low. The area sits between 4,000 and 5,000 feet on the opposite side of the valley from Panorama, so snowfall has to be very modest. Weather was overcast but temps in the 20s F. I was there from 12:30 - 2:00PM. A paper trial map was posted at the ticket window.
IMG_4227.JPG

Has anyone else ever seen a sign saying "Powder skis required on blacks?"

View riding the chair:
IMG_4228.JPG

Even though the customers are overwhelmingly families teaching young kids, Fairmont is not a bunny hill. It has mainstream intermediate pitch with some variations that would be marked single black on many mountains. Liftblog backs up this impression as the length to vertical ratio of that chair is just under 4 to 1.

View down from the top:
IMG_4229.JPG


View across lower mountain to base lodge:
IMG_4230.JPG

There is some Canadian Rockies scenery surrounding the ski area.

I skied 6 runs totaling 5,550 vertical. Would that have been above average for the recent Project 101 US tour? The brochure quote rounds up the claimed vertical to 1,000. Liftblog says that chair is 875 vertical.

I saw a few snowmaking guns. Nonetheless the partially hardpacked surface did not have the telltale slick subsurface. A local mother and daughter initiated conversation in the parking lot when they saw my California license plate. She said the snowmaking guns are portable, capacity is not that high, and that the chair had opened only a week ago with more snow from the prior week than Panorama got. So there's the explanation for surprisingly pleasant snow surfaces.

If I had been paying, a senior lift ticket would have been $42US.
 
Actually I think I did, but part of that info came from the conversation with the mother and daughter in the parking lot. I also learned a fair amount from the Panorama resident with whom I rode the first two lifts on Saturday.

I’ll ask James again, “Do you think Worldskitraveller averaged over 5K per area on his trip.” 5K allowed me to ski nearly every open run at Fairmont and I’m sure that’s true at many of the Midwest and upstate NY areas he visited.

As I said before my critique is not how he handled the small places. It’s basic logic that the larger the ski area (caveat most terrain open with acceptable snow) the more time is needed to get a comparable overview.

Note that actually skiing Fairmont refuted my two preconceived notions: that it would be flat and that snow would suck. I may have been lucky on the snow.
 
Last edited:
I don't feel that you spent a sufficient amount of time there to understand the true essence
It's an interesting comparison for sure.

From an objective perspective Tony spent the same amount of time at Fairmont as worldskitraveler might have (hard to say since worldskitraveler seems to only ski one run per lift much of the time). That said, Tony spent at least two nights at the same lodging and did not push to ski 1-or 2 additional places on the same day as Fairmont nor on the same day as skiing Panorama.

I would think even with a short day the experience at Fairmont would stick out in ones memory as either good, bad or indifferent more so than what must be a run-on, partial memory of each place when doing 79 places in a couple of weeks (shrugs shoulders).
 
Fairmont has a surface lift serving a beginner run or two. So I say Worldskitraveller rides each lift once for about 1,200 vertical. Anyone here think differently?
 
Back
Top