Gore Mtn, NY: 2/20/09 - 2/23/09

I'm not sure what you're trying to prove with the Crocker-esque number crunching.

You've skied at WF a lot more than me, but from my experience, unless you go during spring (when it's generally great), there's always something "challenging" going on conditions-wise. I think my 20-inch day in December was a good example. If I hadn't gone under the ropes, it would've been frustrating.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=7357#p39583

A powder chaser like skimore would sooner pack up and head to Lake Placid for beerz rather than ski the typical cover at Whiteface. I'm less demanding in my pre-requisites... I know in advance that it'll be like a box of chocolates.
 
I've skied WF enough times to say for certain that WF does not hold snow very well and get's windbuffed. It is very exposed and unprotected. It is very succeptible to icy conditions, much more so than Gore and any other ski area in VT.

A guy I know lives in Saranac Lake (Jimski). He has a pass for both mountains and lives about 20 min from WF. He drives 1 1/2 hours to Gore because conditions are so much better overall, in addition to the fact that the tree skiing at Gore is far superior.

The ski experience at WF is much different than any other ski area in the northeast that I've been to. The trails are steeper and longer and you ski them much faster than most any other place. Big GS turns are the norm for most of the terrain there. The more technical terrain exists, but it is often too frozen over to ski, and there just isn't as much of it as you would find at Gore or any of the VT resorts.
 
My point was that wind is the real problem at whiteface, not snow amounts. Snow amounts don't tell the whole story. That being said, if you know where to hit it....
 
Sharon":1m1kfakw said:
I've skied WF enough times to say for certain that WF does not hold snow very well and get's windbuffed. It is very exposed and unprotected. It is very succeptible to icy conditions, much more so than Gore and any other ski area in VT.

That is the problem, not snow amounts.
 
rfarren":uc7sxugh said:
That is the problem, not snow amounts.

I agree. 10' of snow may fall at Whiteface, but sometimes you'd be hardpressed to find it.

When we were there in December it snowed 10" overnight. We skied during the storm on Sunday and it kept getting better and better. We figured on Monday morning we'd have a big powder day. The lifts were on windhold and it was snowing sideways. We decided not to ski at WF but to go into the backcountry instead and stay in the protected areas. Our friends who did ski, skied for 2 hours and said that it was completely windbuffed. Sketchy ice and some drifts, but there is not much to hold onto those drifts on that mountain.
 
Sharon":20p08sk0 said:
10' of snow may fall at Whiteface, but sometimes you'd be hardpressed to find it....Our friends who did ski, skied for 2 hours and said that it was completely windbuffed. Sketchy ice and some drifts, but there is not much to hold onto those drifts on that mountain.

However, if you know which trails stay protected, and where on certain trails the snow gathers you can get pretty good conditions. I've seen a lot of skiers complain about the snow quality on paron's, when the northern half of skyward was delight, especially near the trees.
 
I would remind all (I'm pretty sure I commented at the top of the eastnet.htm page) that the Stowe data is from the Mansfield Stake and runs lower than at the ski resorts due to methodology. Mansfield Stake measurements are taken once a day at 4PM, vs. early morning (and some places twice a day) at the resorts. I would presume that by observation NVT locals would tell us that Stowe gets only slightly less than Smuggs (and by FTO report impression is a better powder bet due to less wind exposure). I may have to reword that page to emphasize this point.

6 inches with less competition vs. the 10 inches on milder terrain with more competition
The difference between 6 inches and 10 inches can be the difference between bottoming out on most turns vs. flotation. If the 6-inch area is notorious for wind you're going to get real powder skiing once in a blue moon. Less than 200 annual inches translates into very few storms of 6 inches or more.

Trust me, regardless of numbers my impressions of eastern skiing come mainly from TR's I read here. Where are the powder reports from Whiteface? Answer: they are exceedingly rare. Same goes for Sugarloaf. These places are about terrain, not snow, and the better reports seem to be from spring, when the steep stuff is adequately covered, soft and not icy.
 
Tony Crocker":1hlvehjm said:
Where are the powder reports from Whiteface? Answer: they are exceedingly rare. Same goes for Sugarloaf. These places are about terrain, not snow, and the better reports seem to be from spring, when the steep stuff is soft and not icy.
While Tony's comment above is more or less correct, I've skied WF about 16 times since 2001... at least half of them had six inches or more and several had more than a foot, as my photos from the third weekend of Dec 2008 show.

I'm not sure why I've had such a good record there because I know that it's not typical. As I mentioned in that recent TR, even with lots of new snow, you still need to pick your spots. IMHO, Whiteface is interesting because of its "force of nature" character.
 
Cover btw is never the issue with Whiteface by the first week of January. If you have edges, it's always carveable. And like James, it always seems like I get pretty good conditions there.
 
rfarren":1soesjss said:
If you have edges, it's always carveable. And like James, it always seems like I get pretty good conditions there.

carveable? That could be said for anywhere.

Whats your definition of good conditions? Why is there only like 1 powder report a year from WF?
 
rfarren":3gaeqxbp said:
If you have edges, it's always carveable.

ZZ top here reporting...I would add, "If you have edges...and know how to use them." :wink:

rfarren":3gaeqxbp said:
And like James, it always seems like I get pretty good conditions there.

I agree with that good conditions doesn't necessarily correlate with powder, however what I heard this weekend from neighbours skiing at the same hill than I was on Sunday was just wrong. They said the conditions were great...great to go skating on, but not to ski. When you can see your face on the hill, I don't call it great.

BTW, I've skied maybe 40 times lifetime at WF, but I have nowhere the powder ratio than James at the place. Either he's been heading to WF on potential powder days while I prefer heading to Vermont OR he needs to give his secret to Tony in order for him to better plan his trips. :mrgreen:

Anyways, tuned my skis and they are ready for tonight or tomorrow night races...so sharp you could shave with them. :twisted:
 
Either he's been heading to WF on potential powder days while I prefer heading to Vermont OR he needs to give his secret to Tony in order for him to better plan his trips.
Most of those WF powder days were back when I was working icelantic hours and could leave town at the drop of a hat. There are lots of reasons to head up to Whiteface/Lake Placid, but powder/soft conditions is a big crapshoot.

Weather reports up there are often useless, so being a local is obviously a huge advantage, just like anywhere else, but even more so. Remember my recent December trip -- three days out, they forecasted 14-18"... the day of the storm, they pulled it back to 6-8, and it ended up being 20" overnight. And you still had to ski closed trails to get the full benefit.
 
Sharon":1r25xm3d said:
Gore has fantastic terrain which is on par with the Vt resorts (on average)...only difference is that Gore just doesn't get the amount of snow that Vt gets, so the epic days are fewer.

Gore's terrain and recent (in the past 15 years since they put in the new gondi) lift layout really spreads people out on busy days. I think the lower mountain is the most crowded, but for the advanced skiers there is so much terrain that crowding is never an issue. Lift lines at the upper mtn lifts are usually less than 5 minutes if any wait at all. Judging by the trail map Gore has more glades than Loon. The glades at Gore are plentiful, varied and awesome. It isn't Stowe or Jay, but for it's size, there are plenty of places to go off the beaten path and lots of potential for fresh tracks after a snow.

No surprise that I agree with that 100%.

kcyanks1":1r25xm3d said:
Aside from lower snowfall, though, Gore suffers from brutal over-grooming and short runs. Recent additions like Double Barrel help a bit.... I skied Hullabaloo this year for the first time in many years. When I was younger it was a much tougher run. The headwall, while only a couple turns, was somewhat hairy, with the center being almost cliff-like, making one of the sides the only real options, sometimes only skier's left. Now it's a groomed flat thing straight across the trial without any character. ... The first year Rumor was open it was far harder than it is now. They later widened it, and then started grooming it.

Also, the vertical per-run is just too short. The Straightbrook chair is probably 600-700, and the most of the expert runs (Hawkeye, Rumor, Lies) are well less than the full vertical of the chair. High Peaks chair is equally short, and the expert trails on that lift also only take up a fraction of the lift's vertical. It just doesn't compare to Northern VT areas.

With snowfall, Gore can be a lot of fun despite the above issues....

Gore has better terrain than Okemo. :-)

I agree with some of that too.

The lift vertical for the primary (non-learning) lifts:

Gondi: 1703
Express: 1500
BRQuad: 1432
Topridge: 998
Straightbrook: 900
North Chair: 750
High Peaks: 684
Sunway: 520

Now I bet KC's first thought is..."yeah but all those long lifts are the least important." He's right.

In order of importance for me are some short lifts:

High Peaks: 684
Straightbrook: 900
North Chair: 750
Topridge: 998
Gondi: 1703
BRQuad: 1432
Sunway: 520
Express: 1500

Truth is High Peaks and SB are probably tied.

North Chair is slow as hell and it helps keeps the Tahawas woods sweet.

Topridge serves some great terrain. Topride itself is steep and long for Gore. The run under the TR chair...High Pines...is an awesome, fun irregularly soft bumped dream. In fact Gore has three great under the chair runs High Pines, Dark Side and Double Barrel. Any day where you ski all three is a great day.

I only rank the Gondi fourth because you need it. It's the fastest way to the summit. There is some good terrain off it. I just think it's a pain in the butt. It's the only lift on the mountain that you have to avoid at certain hours.

The new Quad is very worth skating to, if there is powder and the trees are open. It's sad that a fanatical skier like me would put the new big bucks quad 6th out of eight. On a powder day with the trees open it would probably be 3rd.

The Express is a redundant, but...key feature. The Gondi can be down or on wind hold, but you can still access the summit.

A couple other points of view:

For me, the Hullabaloo headwall is plenty cliffy. Maybe at times they blow so much snow on it it gets flattened.

And also I think both Rumor and Lies are great runs. They might be better narrower. But they really don't get groomed that much. Rumor maybe just a few times a season.

There's lots of different kinds terrain and it spreads people out.

It comes down to what Tony said:

"...Harvey44 is on telemark skis. I might think Gore's terrain is tame on alpine, but I'd have my hands full on teles."

For me...a guy who never really rode lifts until age 40...it's a great place to teleski.

Huge percentage of terrain is trees, small huckable cliffs, high speed groomers, and (an admittedly limited amount of) steep terrain. Off the map in-bounds stuff doubles the size of the mountain.

With a permit, I can actually ski from the Gore summit, back to the cabin. For me...that's sweet.

My rambling 2¢.
 
Harvey44":31emfhw5 said:
With a permit, I can actually ski from the Gore summit, back to the cabin. For me...that's sweet.

Have you done this yet?

I was recently studying the topo of the area to see what that run might be like. Aside from getting through Barton Mines, it is mostly downhill, though there are some flatter areas to contend with.

A better bet is to ski off the backside of the summit into the Black Mtn Creek drainage. You can't get too lost. If you keep following the drainage, you'll eventually end up at the road. But with a little advanced planning, you can hit some nice faces and have a nice bushwhackin descent to Chatiemac Rd. No permit required, and it would be quite an adventure.

The people who got lost back there were just stupid. It isn't that hard to figure out how to get out. With a bit of effort you can get to a road within a coupla hours...it's not like Kicking Horse.
 
Sharon":nqwosqgp said:
Harvey44":nqwosqgp said:
With a permit, I can actually ski from the Gore summit, back to the cabin.

Have you done this yet?

I did it once a long time ago. Actually before we owned the property. I glossed over the details. It's best as a free-heeled ski although I've seen it done on AT gear too. The vertical drop is about 1500 feet.

The permit I spoke of...you need permission to cross Barton's land and Garnet Hill Lodge is the primary entity with ongoing permission.

There's another option...you can tie into the newly marked Raymond Brook Trail...formerly known as the Secret Ski... and ski down to a new trailhead on Route 28 at about 1000 feet. This is an old tradition route, and part of the original Gore trail system.

Somehow I'm betting this is not news to Sharon. :D
 
The lift vertical for the primary (non-learning) lifts:
Gondi: 1703
Express: 1500
BRQuad: 1432
Topridge: 998
Straightbrook: 900
North Chair: 750
High Peaks: 684
Sunway: 520

Now I bet KC's first thought is..."yeah but all those long lifts are the least important." He's right.

In order of importance for me are some short lifts:
High Peaks: 684
Straightbrook: 900
North Chair: 750
Topridge: 998
Gondi: 1703
BRQuad: 1432
Sunway: 520
Express: 1500

Truth is High Peaks and SB are probably tied.
North Chair is slow as hell and it helps keeps the Tahawas woods sweet.
Topridge serves some great terrain. Topride itself is steep and long for Gore. The run under the TR chair...High Pines...is an awesome, fun irregularly soft bumped dream. In fact Gore has three great under the chair runs High Pines, Dark Side and Double Barrel. Any day where you ski all three is a great day.
I only rank the Gondi fourth because you need it. It's the fastest way to the summit. There is some good terrain off it. I just think it's a pain in the butt. It's the only lift on the mountain that you have to avoid at certain hours.
The new Quad is very worth skating to, if there is powder and the trees are open. It's sad that a fanatical skier like me would put the new big bucks quad 6th out of eight. On a powder day with the trees open it would probably be 3rd.
The Express is a redundant, but...key feature. The Gondi can be down or on wind hold, but you can still access the summit.
A couple other points of view:
For me, the Hullabaloo headwall is plenty cliffy. Maybe at times they blow so much snow on it it gets flattened.
And also I think both Rumor and Lies are great runs. They might be better narrower. But they really don't get groomed that much. Rumor maybe just a few times a season.
There's lots of different kinds terrain and it spreads people out.
It comes down to what Tony said:
"...Harvey44 is on telemark skis. I might think Gore's terrain is tame on alpine, but I'd have my hands full on teles."
For me...a guy who never really rode lifts until age 40...it's a great place to teleski.
Huge percentage of terrain is trees, small huckable cliffs, high speed groomers, and (an admittedly limited amount of) steep terrain. Off the map in-bounds stuff doubles the size of the mountain.
With a permit, I can actually ski from the Gore summit, back to the cabin. For me...that's sweet.
My rambling 2¢.
Harvey Homer :-"

You should write one of those "Guide to ___" books like they have for Snowbird and Alta, where you name every rock, dropped pine cone, and twig.
 
jamesdeluxe":1rex4dxy said:
Harvey Homer :-"

You should write one of those "Guide to ___" books like they have for Snowbird and Alta, where you name every rock, dropped pine cone, and twig.

This wasn't the first time I've been outed as a homer. I was in the saddle lodge and Buella from Skiadk introduced me to her friend as "the guy who likes Gore."

With regard writing a book....I'm more of a blogger I think. Books are too much work. I tried to share some opinions without giving up any mountain secrets.
 
Tony Crocker":2h3vtw7a said:
Where are the powder reports from Whiteface? Answer: they are exceedingly rare. Same goes for Sugarloaf. These places are about terrain, not snow, and the better reports seem to be from spring, when the steep stuff is adequately covered, soft and not icy.

the reports are rare from places that aren't stowe, jay, mrg cuz, well most internet folk flock to the places that are known for getting the most snow and unfortunately from my experience get tracked out the fastest. trust me, the storms that hit the loaf, the riv, and others are just as good as vermont and oftentimes hit there when vermont gets none or much less. so, if you hit up a lot of the storms that hit maine, and others that hit no vermont and have a flexible schedule to do so, then you may hit close to 500 inches worth of storms in a winter like the wasatch gets on an average year. this is how i ski so much pow while living in the east. i hit storms that fall only south of 89. that would be 2 storms totaling 22" on march 2nd and march 9th that places as far north as loon got nuthin. actually i hit the 23rd of feb as well with 20 inches at the rivah where it snowed more than points west. so, 3 mondays in a row totaling 42 inches that vermont got a fraction of. crap and then there was feb 19th at gulf of slides where i skied another 20 inches of fresh. that be a total of 62 inches in less than a month that in any one place was pretty lean for snowfall. this doesn't include the 10" and 20" storms i hit at cannon around x-mas and the foot at burke on jan 8th, my b-day. there were many, many more this year as well. and i'd call this year just above average.

sunny corn skiing coming up for tues/wed the 16th/17th. the ski day count continues.......

rog
 
Back
Top