Patrick":9055bbns said:10 trails this weekend :!: :!: :!: Pathetic. :roll:
Sugarloafer":68ukbp8c said:What's sad is that if ASC feels the need to offer "late" spring skiing, they could offer a legitimate product by keeping Sugarloaf open
Sugarloaf's lifts start just about from the base of the mountain at around 1,600 feet. Superstar, by comparison IIRC, is at around 2,000 feet at the bottom or slightly higher. Those low elevation flatter areas are by far the first to melt out, as Stowe learned the hard way this spring.
hamdog":2ca3ysa0 said:elevation didn't matter in the east i thought?
hamdog":2ca3ysa0 said:and stowe had a terrible year.
Admin":2avlq6k6 said:Sugarloaf is 4.5 hours of driving from the only population center that could feed it late-season skiers, and once the percentage of late-season diehards is applied to that single population base, you realize that the place would lose gobs of cash as a late-season operation. K-Mart, by comparison, has not only Boston but also NYC, NJ, Philadelphia, CT, etc. to draw from within a reasonable drive. It's pure economics at play here. Take one look at annual skier visits -- IIRC, Sugarloaf does less than 200,000 visits per year overall.
hamdog":3u6igpt7 said:elevation didn't matter in the east i thought? it's whether or not you're up
north or in the south. in the west, it's different. however, with regards to
the Loaf and Kmart elevations, being on the east, the fact is that the Loaf
is farther north. that means colder temps. if Mt Washington was in
Worcester (Wustah) than it'd all be melted by now, even still with the
elevation and snow it has recieved this year, just because it's further south.
and stowe had a terrible year. almost 4' less than the Loaf and Kmart.
powderfreak":3oq1k0gd said:As for Stowe's rough season...I haven't checked numbers and don't always trust ski areas but generally reguard them as semi-accurate. Sugarloaf did get hammered this season...at least after February 10-12 when the first major storm rolled through northern New England. It continued to snow for about a month straight and then left as quickly as it came. I'd wager that we saw just about as good of a season in northern VT as Killington did although year end totals may suggest more accumulation. Southern VT got hit more-so earlier in the season (Dec-early Feb) while southern New England was setting records. Then the snow switched northward and by April 1, the natural snow depth at Stowe was at or above that of Killington's.
k2trav":24mm8ax6 said:Admin your claim that Sugarloaf recieves less than 200,000 visits a year is WRONG, Sugarloaf had skier visits this year of around 330,000 and hasnt had less than 300,000 for quite a few years
k2trav":24mm8ax6 said:BTW even killington is losing money staying open late
but is K really loosing money staying open late? perhaps enough people buy season passes because of early/late season skiing that they have already made their late season money. know what i am saying? clearly, their day ticket passes don't pay for late season passes, but what percentage of people at kmart are actually paying for day tickets once they are down to superstar?k2trav":2ifu6at6 said:BTW even killington is losing money staying open late
20thSkier":2c5zynl7 said:Anyone have any idea what the marginal cost of K staying open an extra day is? I think it's likely to be pretty low. I remember that a few years ago (during the Great Winter) MRG was in great skiing shape into mid-April. They said that it costs them $500/day to be open so as long as they got at least 10-12 lift ticket sales per day, they'd stay open. I'd guess it costs K a little more than this, but it's not like we're talking about hundreds of thousands of bucks here.
Of course, if you add in the cost of snowmaking so they still have snow this late the cost goes up. But right now, given the snowpack they have, I doubt it actually costs them much at all to be open.