Mammoth, Feb. 2-4, 2026

Tony Crocker

Administrator
Staff member
Despite Liz’ imminent departure for Africa this weekend, we skied Monday-Wednesday at Mammoth because of the WWSRA industry demo. I convinced Liz that 3 days of exercise at 10,000 feet would be good for her before her Kilimanjaro hike next week.

The last new snow was when were here last on Jan. 8. Nonetheless at least half of the mountain has had no melt freeze. That meant ungroomed terrain on chairs 1, 3 and 5 was in good shape. The steeps had a lot of tight chalk and many runs up there were intimidating and rarely skied. I only saw patrol on Climax and just a handful of skiers on the Wipe Outs. We never saw anyone skiing chair 22 either, though were not on that side of the hill much.

All 3 days were sunny. Monday highs were upper 30s and the other days low 40’s. Breeze was only on top. Tuesday night froze a bit harder than Sunday or Monday.

Monday was a recon day so we would know suitable places to test the demos the next two days. After warmups on Stump, Broadway and Andy’s, we tired Cornice, where we had read of a treacherous entry but it was freshly groomed to a decent width.
IMG_3868.JPG

Halfway up is the starting gate for junior downhill training. The race course all the way through lower St. Antoin is fenced off all week.

After the Cornice, I rode 23 and tried Drop Out 1, where we had seen skiers. This had the tight chalk, requiring the precision and effort that is now problematic for me past age 70. So I am reminded to be pickier about forgiving conditions on runs like that.

Past the bottom of Chair 23 I ran into Elissa and some friends. I called Liz and we skied a few runs together.
IMG_6929-Liz-Vic-Elissa-Ann-Tony.jpg


We rode chair 10, observing the section of Solitude which some of us call Multitude.
IMG_3872a.JPG


It is not necessary to ski that part if you know your way around. The ~11AM timing was good for chair 9, where we skied Gold Hill and Slot. Elissa went to lunch while Liz and I skied 3 runs on Chair 5, overview while riding 10:
IMG_3873a.JPG


We skied Triangle, Face of 5 (pic below) and Sanctuary.
IMG_3876.JPG


By 1PM we had taken 2 and 23 to ski the backside and meet Elissa again. The off piste from top of Roadrunner that I had skied 4 weeks ago was still covered but rock solid. Once below the top of 14 conditions were excellent. Often there are upslope winds during these long dry spells, mostly a negative but 14 is the one area that gets blown-in snow in that scenario. So we wound up taking 4 runs there.

Early in morning I had observed skiers on Monument.
IMG_3865.JPG


So I hiked up from 14 to ski that. Here Liz is hiking farther to inspect Scotty’s.
IMG_3883.JPG

It was narrow at the entry, so she returned to the front side via Roadrunner.

I passed on skier’s left side of Monument that had a convex rollover where I could not see below, given my prior Drop Out run. I traversed partway to Scotty’s, then skied a few steep moguls, carefully as there were a few rocks exposed. Once below them the snow was wide open smooth chalk, softer than Drop Out and not quite as steep, so I would return the next two days.

That downhill course starting mid-Cornice extended far down lower St. Anton, so a path was groomed from the bottom of Scotty’s to Bristlecone. From there I met Liz at chair 12. We traversed into Bark Bowl, and from where saw a clean line to St. Anton. We thought it was near the bottom of that fence, but no. We had to get on the ground and slide under it.
IMG_3884.JPG


It was about 3:15 so we knew the racers were done, but we later heard that because it was downhill training the public was not allowed on it all week. I skied 26,000 vertical Monday.
 
Last edited:
With Liz's departure for Africa today and my 5 week road trip starting tomorrow, the past few days home have been hectic.

I had not been to the industry demo since 2022, so my prior registration info online had been lost. We went to the credential pickup event at Eagle Lodge Monday evening and were able to register there. Tuesday morning Liz is showing her credential at the entry.
IMG_3891.JPG


We both started with Kastles, based upon favorable recollections from past demos. Mine was the Transcend 98 at 118cm. We skied Broadway, Face of 3, Cornice and Stump. Both Liz and I thought our skis loved speed but were maybe a bit too much work if you wanted to take it easier.

Mt second ski was Volkl Mantra84. I do not recall what Liz had, but she didn't like it and skied down the base after our first run on Andy's. I skied Dave's, then Solitude/Crosswalk groomers to chair 4 before returning to what Liz had heard was an early lunch at 11AM.

The lunch was really at 1PM and Liz was at the far end of the lot at Icelantic. Next door I spotted these unusual skis.
IMG_6958.jpg

The Shredshox skis have an air suspension shock absorber at front and tail of each ski. I was intrigued because back in 2010 I had demoed the Anton Active Suspension at Sun Valley. The Antons had radical dimensions, 162 length and 78mm underfoot, while the Shredshox were a quite conventional 175cm and 87mm underfoot. I adapted to the Antons immediately but had a lot of trouble getting the Shredshox to engage their edges. So like Liz' second demo I only skied Rusty's then returned to base via Mambo.
Shredshox.jpg


So I tried Icelantic also, the Shaman 2.0, 99mm underfoot and 182cm length. This ski looked like the Salomon BBR of the early 2010's, very wide tip and conventional tail. I was among many skiers who did not like the BBR. The Icelantic rep said that they corrected the BBR flaws with a stiffer tail. Both skis are intended to require less forward lean to initiate turns. This is correct, but if you're used to skiing groomers a certain way for decades, you don't want to be thinking about it every run. The stiffer tail did prevent the somewhat unstable feel of the BBRs on groomed Saddle Bowl, World Cup and Coyote. Ungroomed runs on Blue Ox and Face of 5 were transparent.

After lunch I had enough experimentation for the day and tried a Nordica Enforcer 89 at 179cm. I skied Saddle Bowl, World Cup, Cornice and Rodger's Ridge. I was getting tired at this point, so my final demo was the Armada Antimatter 92 at 180cm. At past demos I have often found Armadas very forgiving without compromising performance. I went directly to the top via chair 23 and skied Skyline and Arriba off the back to 14. Chair 14 has a couple of interesting sights in the rocks next to Dos Passos.
IMG_6971a.jpg


IMG_6946a.jpg


I was reenergized, so I decided to ski the same Monument finale as on Monday. Snow was fine but it's steep enough I need to suck wind halfway down. Views up and down from there:
IMG_3888.JPG


IMG_3889.JPG


I skied Bristlecone to Main Lodge, then Patrolmen's back to the demo, finishing Tuesday with 24,900 vertical.
 
Thursday rated to be a bit firmer to start the day with a colder overnight freeze, plus we were there for opening bell, untouched Stump Alley on our first ride up.
IMG_3893.JPG


Accordingly I took out the Stockli AX80 at 173cm. Liz was a bit more focused at this event because her Blizzard Sambas are 11 years old and losing their liveliness. She started Thursday with the Elan Ripstick 94 and loved it immediately as we skied Broadway and the Face and Back of 3. We next skied Cornice and she was right on my tail, demonstrating her comfort with that ski. So she skied the Blue Ox bumps while I made wide arcs down Andy's.

We returned to the same brands; I took the Stormrider 95, a ski I've enjoyed before, and Liz the Ripstick 100. Liz did not like it as much as the 94. I felt right at home, so after skiing Andy's and back of 3, I rode 23 for a third run on Monument, this time in morning sun. Nonetheless this is the time I screwed up, caught an edge and went for a very long slide, comparable only to two other times, both in 1982.
IMG_3865.JPG

Green is where I skied, red is my best guess of how far I fell ~500 feet. I was below the rocks when I fell, so I wasn't going to hit anything, but it was still scary due to the considerable speed on firm chalk and 30+ degree pitch at the top. I tried to get my skis down; with surface snow spraying in my face I don't know how soon they came off. I grabbed my left pole with my right hand, then brought my left hand down to the basket to self arrest. I was sliding too fast to stop at first, spun around once or twice, but eventually was able to arrest.

I caught my breath for awhile, then tested a boot while still holding my pole in the snow and the boot slipped even though the slope was probably not more than 20 degrees. My guess is that I go another 200+ feet without the self arrest. Since I don't think it's safe to stand up I called Liz' voicemail to request patrol. Within a minute of making the call two skiers showed up with my skis, followed shortly by patrol. Patrol is of course concerned about injury and his first question is, "Do you remember what happened?" because if you don't (like Lonnie) that's a likely sign of concussion. I said "I won't forget this one for a long time!" Patrol helped me get skis on and suggested I traverse out to groomed Scotty's. I felt OK so I skied the intermediate pitched chalk down to Bristlecone and fortunately skiing felt normal too.

The above incident means I missed the 200 breakfast burritos handed out at the demo around 10AM, but Liz grabbed two and I ate mine at the Mill after checking out the Armada ARV100, definitely wanting a forgiving ski for the next demo. Liz was on the ARW women's version of the same ski. Chair 2 had stopped and had a growing liftline, so we took chairs 10 and 5, then skied Gold Hill to 9. View of Roma's, Dave's and Rockgarden from top of 5:
IMG_3894a.JPG


Gold Hill seemed firmer than Monday, could have been the overnight freeze though it was 40F+ by this time. But the ARV/ARW skis have some tail rocker and are probably a better soft snow ski.

It's fairly clear that I want early rise but a stiff tail in my daily driver ski. My Blizzard Bonafides, of which I've had four pair since December 2011, set a very high bar for versatility. So my next demo was to see what Blizzard offers now. The most comparable ski is the Anomaly, which is not offered in the same dimensions. It's either 94 or 102mm underfoot and 176 or 182 length. I demoed the 94mm version at 182cm. We went up to chair 3, skied Coyote to 5, then an ungroomed chalky mix of smooth and bumps on Face of 5 to Sanctuary. I wanted Liz to ski Armada Antimatter, but her size was out on this demo, so we only skied 3 runs despite liking our skis.

We had time for 2 more demos, and fortunately the Antimatter 92 at 164cm was available for Liz at 1:15. Meanwhile I took the Elan Ripstick 96, most similar to Liz' first demo Thursday. Liz loved the Antimatter immediately and so skied West Bowl bumps for her second run on them.
IMG_3897a.JPG

Meanwhile I skied the ungroomed chalky liftline of 3.

We decided this would be our final demo and so kept them for 2 hours. We skied Broadway to ride the bottom to top gondola. From the top we skied Rockgarden.
IMG_3908.JPG


IMG_3911.JPG


Once out of the moguls, the apron had chalky snow smoother and softer than other upper runs we had skied. We crossed to chair 3, skiing the ungroomed lower sector, also with excellent windbuff, overall possibly the best snow of the trip. We skied back of 3 to 23, then skyline to Arriba and chair 14. Liz in upper Arriba moguls:
IMG_3916.JPG


We skied another 14 lap on Santiago. I showed discretion after my morning misadventure and returned to the front side with Liz via chair 13 and Secret Spot. After another Patrolmen's finale I finished with 26,900 vertical.

Liz will be looking for the Armada Antimatter 92 for next season.
 
Last edited:
My slide was on Wednesday. I did not take a picture of the Drop Outs, but Mammoth Snowman posted this one from Wednesday.
DropOuts_020626.png

Drop Out 2 is at upper center. If you fall above that you will hit something. And I can attest that you will be moving fast in current conditions when you do.

I was absolutely trashed on Thursday, nothing specific from the fall, mainly overall muscle fatigue from 3 days of aggressive skiing. Normally I try to ski as efficiently as possible, but with demo skis you want to push hard part of the time to see what they will do. I went to an 8PM yoga class Thursday night and felt better Friday.

That Mammoth trip encouraged my opinion of Liz' prospects on Kilimanjaro. She wanted a cardio workout at 10,000 feet, sought out several bump runs and I don't think she was as fatigued as I was Thursday, when she went to a Pilates class. I drove her to LAX this afternoon.
 
Last edited:
Drop Out 2 is at upper center. If you fall above that you will hit something. And I can attest that you will be moving fast in current conditions when you do.
steep, icy moguls
The immediate question is "why bother?" (and it hasn't snowed at Mammoth in more than a month?) but as a non-expert who doesn't have the thrillseeking gene, I've learned not to ask that.
 
99% of the snow up there was chalky and had not been through a melt freeze. I'm not saying 100% because larger rocks can get warmer and melt/freeze adjacent snow. Some of the chalk was stiffer and had no loose snow, and those runs were rarely skied, especially if there were exposed rocks below. Climax, which is not as steep as the top of the Drop Outs, was the prime example.

I observed several skiers (obviously above my pay grade) skiing both Drop Out 1 and Monument fluidly before I skied those runs. Drop Out 1 was steeper and thus ran my heart rate up enough that it was harder to control turns and I was often doing it one turn at a time. I did not return even though that line would definitely been in my comfort zone a decade ago. My Monday and Tuesday Monument runs were fun with only one suck wind break, which is why I went there Wednesday on a demo ski that I liked as I had on Tuesday. There is no time ever that I would have considered Drop Out 2 in that condition.
 
Back
Top