I know that this format has succeeded in Europe, but is this a workable model for a place like Snow King? (I hope so.)
http://www.firsttracksonline.com/2011/0 ... on-profit/
http://www.firsttracksonline.com/2011/0 ... on-profit/
According to Forbes Magazine, using 2010 census data, the 25 richest counties in the US are:soulskier":2wapz1ep said:I have heard that Teton County, according to the IRS, is the richest county in the US. Lots of philanthropic and foundation funds floating around Jackson, seems like a great place to use the non-profit model.
jamesdeluxe":2t2vw6ce said:I know that this format has succeeded in Europe, but is this a workable model for a place like Snow King? (I hope so.)
http://www.firsttracksonline.com/2011/0 ... on-profit/
Marc_C":3brjv42m said:According to Forbes Magazine, using 2010 census data, the 25 richest counties in the US are:soulskier":3brjv42m said:I have heard that Teton County, according to the IRS, is the richest county in the US. Lots of philanthropic and foundation funds floating around Jackson, seems like a great place to use the non-profit model.
Loudoun County, VA
Fairfax County, VA
Howard County, MD
Hunterdon County, NJ
Somerset County, NJ
Fairfax City, VA
Morris County, NJ
Douglas County, CO
Arlington County, VA
Montgomery County, MD
Nassau County, NY
Stafford County, VA
Calvert County, MD
Prince William County, VA
Putnam County, NY
Goochland County, VA
Williamson County, TN
Marin County, CA
Santa Clara County, CA
Forsyth County, GA
Charles County, MD
Summit County, UT
Alexandria City, VA
Chester County, PA
Suffolk County, NY
The 2011 rankings are only slightly different for the top 10:
1 Falls Church, Virginia
2 Loudoun County, Virginia
3 Fairfax County, Virginia
4 Hunterdon County, New Jersey
5 Howard County, Maryland
6 Los Alamos County, New Mexico
7 Douglas County, Colorado
8 Morris County, New Jersey
9 Somerset County, New Jersey
10 City of Fairfax, Virginia
Nope. Annual gross income is used by both.soulskier":14bkbow4 said:I would suspect the Census and/or Forbes use a different criteria than the IRS when measuring wealth.
Marc_C":2xjfjj62 said:Nope. Annual gross income is used by both.soulskier":2xjfjj62 said:I would suspect the Census and/or Forbes use a different criteria than the IRS when measuring wealth.
Correct - Manhattan is technically New York County. Queens is Queens County. Brooklyn is Kings County (go figure). I forget what the Bronx and Staten Island (Richmond County?) are, not that they'd show up on one of these lists.Tony Crocker":2julkmhc said:Bridger Bowl and Bogus Basin are well known and successful nonprofit ski areas. We got a book on the history of Bogus Basin on the NASJA trip there. They had some struggling periods but have been in decent shape since they started the discount season pass program in 1998. But they are the only super close partial day/night ski area to a 500K metro area in Boise. Snow King in a resort town with an iconic ski area in the same neighborhood looks like a more challenging proposition.
In that last list I presume "New York" at #2 means Manhattan. Each borough is considered its own county in NYC, right?
Geoff":1c2jszjm said:I'm kind of surprised that Douglas County, Co ranks that high. I didn't realize that metro-Denver had that many high-paying jobs.
jamesdeluxe":1c2jszjm said:I'm blanking... other than MRG, Magic, and some very small club hills in NYS (Holimont, Cazenovia, Skaneateles), which other mountains in the East are not-for-profit? Aren't there a couple in Maine?
berkshireskier":vh4tw7wa said:I may be missing something here, but what is the advantage of a ski area becoming a "not-for-profit" entity? if, as the article on Snow King mentions, the ski area is losing $500,000 per year on a cash flow basis, becoming a "not-for-profit" will not magically make that loss disappear. Usually, entities want to become a "non-profit" (typically under section 501(c)(3) of the IRC) so that donors to the entity can get a tax deduction for their donation but I don't believe that a ski area would qualify under this code section as a "charitable" entity.
berkshireskier":2ubj0m0f said:I may be missing something here, but what is the advantage of a ski area becoming a "not-for-profit" entity? if, as the article on Snow King mentions, the ski area is losing $500,000 per year on a cash flow basis, becoming a "not-for-profit" will not magically make that loss disappear. Usually, entities want to become a "non-profit" (typically under section 501(c)(3) of the IRC) so that donors to the entity can get a tax deduction for their donation but I don't believe that a ski area would qualify under this code section as a "charitable" entity.
jamesdeluxe":21q3c87h said:Aren't there a couple in Maine?
As someone who's gone through the process of acquiring a ski area (I have no idea what is involved), maybe SS can explain if this is merely a tactic to get better terms.soulskier":85jluhqh said:Negotiations on the the conversion have stalled.
jamesdeluxe":3mg4w90p said:As someone who's gone through the process of acquiring a ski area (I have no idea what is involved), maybe SS can explain if this is merely a tactic to get better terms.soulskier":3mg4w90p said:Negotiations on the the conversion have stalled.