jasoncapecod
Well-known member
They just informed me that the cost is going up from 31 to 50$....nope i cancelled...i can understand the GFS and ECMWF just fine for free
Last edited:
The single user plan went away. $50 is the base plan for 1-4 users.An OpenSnow subscription for $50/year for a single recreational skier is high given the benefits.
I don't think it's that difficult to round up a group to share. Admittedly OpenSnow has become a must have for me due to facilitating/cross checking my in-season progress reports.Might drop it like a hot rock by next summer when they want me to renew though.
Here's what I see for pricing as of Nov. 22, 2025 for a new account . . . when logged out.
Base Family is $71.99 until Dec. 2 instead of $89.99. Premium Family is $143.99 instead of $179.99, or $36 each for the next year for a new account covering 4 email addresses.
I'll be perfectly happy continuing with Base when the renewal comes up next summer. Won't have to be distracted by AI Overviews.
View attachment 48128
I don't use OpenSnow for skiing in NC/VA/WV. Between knowing the micro-climates well and SkiSoutheast reporting there is no need.A friend gave me a free subscription once, but I didn't really use it much. I ski when I ski, regardless of conditions. Three to four times per week when in local mode. I use the national weather service local forecasts for how to dress in the immediate next few days. The one or two destination trips per winter are preplanned, so no backing out if conditions aren't ideal. Usually pick prime season to travel so not likely to encounter disastrous situation.
I have found they are consistently too high with their snowfall totals for my area.
this where we disagree... the model tend to under due the mountain qpf...Also you can't just click on the total qpf map and use that number. I feel Open Snows model is purposely verbose to generate clicks and views...This is true.
But in my opinion doesn't matter.
Here's a screencap of the lift served ski areas in my neighborhood for the next 15 days:
View attachment 48176
Yea the amounts are probably way high.
But it helps me decide who to watch and ultimately where to ski.
IMO many of the models do this too. (NAM, GFS) Estimate huge totals, but you can still use them to decide where to go. Isn't that what matters?
Not disputing this.I feel Open Snows model is purposely verbose to generate clicks and views...