Oz/NZ 2025

Can you send me the cliff notes?
I agree; it takes almost as long to read that novella-length transcript as to watch the video. Still (and we've discussed this before), it's much more efficient to read the content of a documentary-style clip than to sit through it. We've used former admin's Grand Adventure travel series as Exhibit A -- they're really well done and he puts a ton of work into them but I'm not going to spend 45-60 minutes watching the whole thing. I prefer an article with photos and a short youtube clip.

In any case, the b-roll of the ski areas showed me that they're more expansive/interesting than I'd presumed. If only there weren't so many dealbreakers -- the high cost of lift tickets, national park fees, lodging, and flights, along with at least 1.5 days of travel time and the risk of underwhelming snow -- I'd consider going there.
 
Isn't ChrisC the one who expressed skepticism about isolated volcanic peaks with chronic wind, rime icing and lift shutdowns? Ruapehu is Exhibit A of all of those. Like Bachelor, I think those places are best skied in spring. But the Ruapehu areas don't get as much snow, and my understanding is that neither has opened yet this season.

Would it be a better decision to forgo the North Island of New Zealand and the Mount Ruapehu ski areas, since they shut down so often, and instead go to Melbourne (lots of reasonable direct flights from Queenstown to Melbourne) and ski the (somewhat?) nearby ski areas such as Mount Hotham and Mount Buller? Note: I have visited Sydney before for multiple days, but not Melbourne.

While conditions may be less desirable, those resorts are more likely to remain open and be impacted by fewer storms. Although I have read online that the mountains of NSW are better than those in Victoria, as they are higher in elevation.

Given all the hidden fees, high lodging costs, and large distances, I see no reason to commit the time & money to ski all of the Australian resorts.
 
Last edited:
I stand by my original view that you need another reason to be in Australia July-Sept. in order to add on some skiing. I was really close (Canberra) in 1997 so I couldn't resist. If you are in tropical Australia as we were in 2019 and expect to be in 2028, there's still a considerable distance factor involved to get to any skiing. If you have to fly extra anyway, I'd go to Christchurch though sbooker keeps telling us that's more expensive. Perhaps not as part of a complex international itinerary.

Would it be a better decision to forgo the North Island of New Zealand and the Mount Ruapehu ski areas, since they shut down so often
I'm surprised to see wipeout seasons with marginal coverage at Ruapehu. I would think average snowfall would be higher (brochure quotes say so) as they are not shadowed by mountains farther west (like nearly all on South Island) and latitude is still 39, a touch more than Melbourne.

With adequate snow coverage you could plan a flexible week on North Island (lots of interesting places), and go for the skiing when you see a calm weather forecast.
 
Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear...

A (return) visit to Queenstown would be a must-do:
  • The ski areas seem the most concentrated and interesting
  • Treble Cone often gets
  • Lots of activities for any down days - Shotover, Bungee, etc
  • Never made it to Milford Sound, so that trip would be of interest

But instead of flying to the North Island/Auckland, go to Australia instead:
  • Auckland - 2 hr flight
  • Melbourne - 3.5 hr flight

It's really no extra effort. You are essentially in the neighborhood. Imagine Melbourne is more interesting than Auckland, but similar.



It appears that there are many down days at Mount Ruapehu, but more snow.

https://www.whakapapa.com/report or https://www.pureturoa.nz/snow-report

1757979446501.png


1757979387198.png


1757979359947.png
 
Imagine Melbourne is more interesting than Auckland, but similar.
Probably, but not vs. North Island overall (Rotorua, Bay of Islands, etc.). And if the weather cooperates the Ruapehu ski areas are much larger scale than Victoria's.

Flying from North America to Christchurch or Queenstown, you are usually going through Auckland anyway.

But Patrick this year and Liz and I in 2012 flew via Brisbane. In our case that was because we were going to an eclipse and scuba liveaboard out of Cairns. But since our international flight was to Brisbane, we had to go back there at the end from NZ. We will likely have a similar scenario in 2028 when Darwin will be the gateway airport to the eclipse.

As noted above there are scenarios where cost/logistics of Auckland vs. Sydney or Melbourne are similar. So it would come down to what are your overall interests and/or where have you not been before.
 
@ChrisC let me know when you’ll be heading to this portion of the globe. I’ll try to meet you for some shared chairs. I’m committed to a Europe hiking trip next September though. October at Ruapehu sounds good.
 
Would it be a better decision to forgo the North Island of New Zealand and the Mount Ruapehu ski areas, since they shut down so often, and instead go to Melbourne (lots of reasonable direct flights from Queenstown to Melbourne) and ski the (somewhat?) nearby ski areas such as Mount Hotham and Mount Buller? Note: I have visited Sydney before for multiple days, but not Melbourne.
Definitely a different vibe in Melbourne. There is also the Great Ocean Drive (?) driving away from the mountains and along the southern coast west. Spent one day driving west instead of towards the mountain.
There are a bunch of things to see on the North Island, unfortunately I only saw Auckland and Rotorua (sp?).
Given all the hidden fees, high lodging costs, and large distances, I see no reason to commit the time & money to ski all of the Australian resorts.
There are not that many to ski. I skied all the resorts with 200m+ vertical drop in 2018. The total is 6
From Melbourne to Canberra (south to north): Buller, Hotham, Falls Creek. (large gap between Victoria and NSW areas) Thredbo, Perisher, Charlotte Pass. The 3 NSW areas can be easily skied from one location.

Flying from North America to Christchurch or Queenstown, you are usually going through Auckland anyway.

As noted above there are scenarios where cost/logistics of Auckland vs. Sydney or Melbourne are similar. So it would come down to what are your overall interests and/or where have you not been before.
Air Canada doesn't fly direct to NZ, so flying with them had me connect in Brisbane on my way to Auckland in 2016. It was a connection in Sydney prior to a direct flight to Christchurch. Return journey was via Brisbane.
Initially debating as a fallback option, if things didn't brighten up in NZ, of simply dropping the final portion of my trip and stay in Australia.
 
Back
Top