jasoncapecod
Well-known member
Just flew non stops Newark Tokyo
14 hrs slept zero mins
Awful
Would have slept better if I was sitting on a stool
14 hrs slept zero mins
Awful
Would have slept better if I was sitting on a stool
You're @ChrisC's hero: RAWDOG!! Actually, maybe not -- if I understand it correctly, you also have to forgo food and drink, which I don't think you did.Just flew non stops Newark Tokyo
14 hrs slept zero mins
Assuming United based on the originating airport? Sounds more like the seats you get on Frontier than any of the mainline airlines...Would have slept better if I was sitting on a stool
Just flew non stops Newark Tokyo
14 hrs slept zero mins
Awful
It didn’t help that we took off at 10am and flew during my day timeAssuming United based on the originating airport? Sounds more like the seats you get on Frontier than any of the mainline airlines...
It's too bad you had that experience, as I realized very early on in my long distance travelling that 'he who sleeps most, wins' when it comes to flying those kind of trips. Nothing worth paying attention to on a plane, but always tons of interesting things to pay attention to when in a foreign land.
Ouch, although you don't sleep on the red-eye going to Europe either. You just like to complain!It didn’t help that we took off at 10am and flew during my day time

A heads-up to people who rent cars in Europe -- there's a new protocol that I encountered at Munich airport two months ago whereby a separate "objective/non-affiliated" entity inspects your car upon return so that, ostensibly, there's no self-serving motivation on behalf of the company to hit you with unwarranted or exaggerated damage fees.
Non-Skiing, but for the first time ever I actually went outside the secure portion of Newark airport (can't tell you how many times I've transited to connecting planes there though - a huge number). I have no context to how it was in the bad days when it used to be described as terrible, but it seemed decent enough on the airport side of things, though with various construction still present on some roads. Biggest terribleness is the way the roads around the airport are configured and how they direct you out of and back to the rental car parking garage. Whomever designed those routes in/out should have their head examined.
Of course whomever designed the arterial roads and signage for northern Jersey for most of the roads in general should have their head examined.
I've rented cars from EWR at least 4x. I don't even recall a parking garage. They were off site parking lots and yes navigation to them is a challenge.Biggest terribleness is the way the roads around the airport are configured and how they direct you out of and back to the rental car parking garage.
All of the major rental car players have been consolidated into a multistory parking garage across from Terminal A. No idea for how long, the garage is clearly pretty new. Leaving, you have to exit it then go around all 4 sides of the garage with 2 traffic lights and several merges just to get onto the expressways. Wildly dumb design IMO.I don't even recall a parking garage. They were off site parking lots
While I'm certainly not going to defend NJ roadway design, it's pretty rich that someone from Denver -- home of perpetually clogged two-lane (!) Peña Boulevard -- is criticizing a different airport for that aspect. DIA's designers had no excuse for such an unforced error considering that the initial land parcel was about the size of Rhode Island. FWIW, I've never ever hit traffic driving into EWR.Wildly dumb design
I don't recall complaining about Newarks hemmed in aspects (though I bet those United pilots that hit the truck landing from Italy a few weeks ago probably are). I do note that Pena was fine as a 4 lane when it handled the as-built DIA expectation of 40-50M passengers. Unfortunately its now well over 80M passengers per year with the local enviros promising to go scorched earth if CDOT proposes to expand Pena to match it's new reality.it's pretty rich that someone from Denver -- home of perpetually clogged two-lane (!) Peña Boulevard -- is criticizing a different airport for that aspect.
For anyone who cares, that's the actual background from EWR Terminal C; however, I asked AI to transform the 787 behind us into a Lockheed TriStar, my favorite passenger jet, and dress it up with the current-day United livery. Pretty impressive IMO! As mentioned before, it ended commercial service around the turn of the century and there's only one plane left that's airworthy.Jason guessed correctly
That depends upon your level of determination.My brother, who struggles to sleep on planes, claims we would travel long haul far less if we didn’t get the plane sleep.
I didn’t experience this earlier in the week. I rented through Centaur out of Malpensa.A heads-up to people who rent cars in Europe -- there's a new protocol that I encountered at Munich airport two months ago whereby a separate "objective/non-affiliated" entity inspects your car upon return so that, ostensibly, there's no self-serving motivation on behalf of the company to hit you with unwarranted or exaggerated damage fees.
Take a look at this, a few pages from the 22-page document that the rental agency sent me to document a tiny scuff on the hubcap (see pic below) for which they demand €502/$582 (including a $110 admin fee). Two potential suspicions for the niggling damage that allegedly occurred while I drove the car, which I disputed with a detailed response in point-by-point German legalese telling them to piss off.
My recommendation is to absolutely positively not sign off on the damage. If you do, that's more or less admitting that you "agree" to the inspector's report and it'll be very difficult to put the toothpaste back in the tube. Instead, I wrote in the comments box "(the damage) was already there."
- The inspector who identifies the purported damage may get a bonus (a portion of the fee) as incentive to go over the car with a fine-toothed comb.
- The rental car company is expecting customers not to fight back since it's easier to let their insurance (private, credit card, or the ripoff kind that you buy at the counter) cover it. It's likely a big profit center, similar to airlines charging for baggage.
I responded in mid-March and haven't heard anything since. We'll see if they'll get back to me at some point.
Has anyone here run into this racket?
View attachment 51461
View attachment 51463
View attachment 51465
View attachment 51466