sugarloaf, me, wildcat , nh, killington vt-4-20/21

joegm

New member
an interesting trip for sure. from the best day of the year last week at loon to probably the worst 2 day stretch all year. crazy? maybe, but this is how it went down.
tuesday the sugarloaf report was claiming 120 trails and specifically articulated 6 bump runs.... now i had never been to the loaf as the drive had always repulsed me. my buddy g tried it about 6 years ago and got lost going and returning... it was a nightmare as i remember him talking about it for week....of course tuesday , i managed to convince him to try it again as, 1) we would probably be at k the rest of the year and 2) it was for the donut as it falls under our bronze asc pass 3) the claim of 6 bump runs seemed like a better bet than k considering all that seems to be going on over in vt with the grooming ... our alternative was the cat but we had concerns about the skiable lines as the week before when we hit cat, most of the lines seemed to be pretty thin except liftlion. our concern was that the lines got croaked in the rain of the past weekend... hedging our bets and factoring in all things like the drive and all, we decided to roll the dice, make the ridiculous drive to the c valley and stay over night for a 2 dayer at the loaf. oh my god what a mistake :twisted:
loaf on wed: left lincoln at 525am... pulled into the p lot at loaf at 9:10am...that in and of itself is out of hand....but again, it's all about the skiing at this point and the promise of 6 bump runs at the time, made the drive tolerable....i could go on for an hour about the ensuing disaster that followed but here is the short story... loaf had not groomed seemingly for 48 hours... it got cold and made all non bumped up terrain a sea of rock hard mini moon craters... it made all bumped terrain unskiable.... they had 2, that's 2 lifts running.. something they call the superquad ( believe me there is nothing super about this piece of crap ) and a double lift off of a 2 set double that pretty much mirros the vert access of the quad... the web site had advertised that the snow fields were open and that a thing called the timeberline was accessing them... simply not true... they stated day of that timberline was closed to winds... problem was there was no wind :twisted: as far as the 120 trails... bull cookies... it's a crock patrick!!!!! :evil: it was not even close....i'm not familiar enough with loaf to name the trails but essentially there were about 7 or 8 options to get down based in the middle part of the mountain... all of them sucked.... no doubt there were 1 or 2 pretty steep lines on a couple of these trails that probably provide some thrills when the snow is right...the incredible decision not to groom was an inexcusable error that i just can't believe a major operation would make...the outright lying about 6 bump runs was nothing short of a disgrace... i don't mean to pile on, but since i'm on a roll... that place is one lame ass hill imo... take it for what it's worth and i'm sure there are some loyal lofers who will disagree for sure...it appears to me that the bottom third of the mountain accounts for about 5 % of the total vertical rise... it seems like 30% of any given run is a run out to the lifts which seem to make no sense in their placement. this famous narrow guage trail that seems to get a lot of press ,seems to me to be a tad bit overrated....but again , that 's just me loaf appears to be a card carrying member of the " only double blacks are for bumps" club. and of course , the bumps on those runs blow...quote #2 fo the day from my amn g, " u can stick this place where the sun don't shine " .... i'd have to agree
i am still in shock as i write this as to how bad of a ski day it was at sugarloaf usa.... even taking about the lack of advertised bump runs, the day was a total disappointment. my buddy g summed it up best when he said, riding up that stupid double set up " this place just feels depressing"... i have don't have anything against old singles or doubles if you are mad river or smugs and can deliver the goods.. from what we saw, the loaf is no mad river or smuggs... i can't envision , for any reason at all, ever going back to that place... i can't see how in any way they manage to remain profitable with what it appers they have to offer when compared to how much effort it takes to get there...absolutely the worst day of the year ( and possibly ever ). after 5 runs, we threw it in as it was that lame... now our problem was what to do at 1230 in the afternoon...skip lunch and hightail it out for about 90 more minutes in the car and try and see if the river had anything or eat lunch and try and figure out what to do on thurs.. we ate....stopped by the cat on the way back to lincoln just to see if we could have made a worse decision...we couldn't have..but that doesn't mean that cat would have been a great decision either... cat looked like it had 1 skiable line, liftlion and then only about halfway down... then it appeared that you had to go hard skiers left and ski the flats the rest of the way down... starr line was wiped out... al's was gone and catenary, despite the lies on the paper report , was gone also.. so the cat report is that it appears to be down to 1 skiable line from the top....i would bet the asc would love to dump this place for sure.
rolled onto lincoln on wed night after about 425 miles in the car. knowing we had the long trip to k and the long ride home the next day, it was an early night..
k on thurs- havin not been at K all winter from nov 23 on, we knew we would be in for some surprises... the first aggravating thing was , becasue we made killer time on the drive , we drove over to bear just to try and see how the new set up looked and all.. of course they had big sing up saying bear was closed as of the 10th, but we just wanted to see ... of course O>L had top to bottom coverage with what looked like great lines...stared at ol for about 10 minutes and drove over to the access rd to drop off some base damage skis for a little tlc hand tune at fred's freeride... imagine the shock... fred is out of business- lock stock and barrel- gone- the real estate sign was out , the fred sign was down, park fred is dead... kind of sad actually... probably the only store left in NE where one could walk in and 1) buy a pair of mogul skis and or pants off the rack, and 2) have an informed , intelligent, real conversation about freestyle mogul skiing....very sad indeed...haskell , what happened man?
we were informed that the rain on wed into thurs had pretty much shut k down to the skiable lines described by geoff in mark's closing post announcement.. and yes there is little doubt that it's may 15th for sure....and of course, the superstar is/was groomed flat... it was rock hard boilerpalte in the am.. the headwall was literally a sheet of ice and remained so ... the middle and the bottom became waterlogged oatmeal by noon and really was not fun at all...it was not corn,.... it was waterlogged unfrozen gran... the disgrace of the day was the greateastern cross over that looked down and up on needles eye, which had the sweetest looking medium sized bumps on it trail wide... but as geoff pointed out, no needles eye quad to access them...it was sickening that that lift was not spinning...there was a different vibe at k on thursday.. i don't know if it's permanent or what.... the amount of people who were thirlled with the early morning rock hard superstar was depressing... i have never seen so many racers or wanna be racers out so late laying down and grinding their turns... for them , it was great....at least until 12 or so... then they all went away... not that there was a lot of people to begin with in the first place ( a problem in and or itself discusssed many times ) the whole place just seems to have a different feel to it... the freestyle scene, seems to be dying or dead for sure....k certainly looks a pretty and spiffy with it's new signage and painted lifts... but something about it seems different :? :( ... back on tues and wed .. i guess we'll see
 
Sugarloaf is one of the best ski areas in the east and usually has fantastic groomed conditions, don't bash the place just because you had a bad experience based on your first visit to the mountain. I have been skiing there since 1989 and consider it to be one of the top 5 ski resorts in New England. The grooming is usually superb and they have very tough mogul runs like BubbleCuffer, Winters Way and the backside of the snowfields.

The Superquad is a great chairlift that services 1700' of vertical and is a fast and efficient addition to the mountain, and most of the lift network is well planned out but they are really lacking a mid-mountain lift.

I am a very dedicated Sugarloafer with 50+ days on the mountain, as well as a skier with 23 years and all 12 calendar months of skiing experience, so I know good and bad skiing when I see it. I find your ski report and remarks about the mountain to be mis-guided and dead wrong.
 
i knew i'd be offending some with the post.. it was not my intent to make it offensive... but i am not bashing it because i had a bad experience on my first ( and last :roll: :wink: ) trip there. i'm bashing it because it was awful and it puts itself out there as one of the elite places to ski...i find that to be " misguided and dead wrong" but it is what it is..my first indication that you don't understand my point is your line about " they have very tough mogul runs" . right, that's my point. the bumps were awful on those runs , as they ususally are on very steep pitches unless they are man made. the superquad i rode had to have been the slowest high speed quad i have ever been on. you say the quad is an addition to the mountain, so i would assume it's relatively new. i guess the only way i could imagine a worse lift system than the one we saw on wed , is the same layout minus that quad. i don't know what else to say about that.. we must just differ in our perceptions of slow and fast. i can't say you are wrong about the grooming usually being superb, but i can speak for that day...and on that day, after 3 and 1/2 hours in the car , we were pretty pissed that sugarloaf choose that day not to be superb :evil: in their grooming. i don't see how the place can afford to make mistakes like that that were so obviously based on economics and when the place requires such a long drive for some... of course it sounds like you live about 7 minutes away :wink: ...i'm glad you enjoy sugarloaf enough to be a loyal loafer. not that you'd have a choice if you are a local cause the place is in the middle of nowhere :lol: but my opinion of the place ( and believe me we didn't just ski the 4 or 5 runs i said we did, we looked around and hiked around pretty good sans the snowfields ) was that it is a tired, old, poorly laid out hill. not that there is anything wrong with being old, aka cat, mrg, as long as you can deliver the goods) you don't address my observation of the bottom 33 % of the hill making up about 5% of the vert and the long run outs ( probably cause you are a racer type skier who doesn't mind going straight and fast all the time- yawn :roll: ) or the shameless lying on the conditions report about type of snow, terrain that is open, terrain features, projected weather and anything else they could fudge- which appears to extend through today, i might add. :shock: . yeah yeah yeah , i know they all do it... but a place that is so far away gets an extra beating for doing it 8) . don't worry L89, you won't have to hear me complaining about the loaf anymore, i think i'd rather ski off my garage roof :lol: :lol: :lol: ... in the summer :lol: :lol: :lol: in the rain :lol: :lol: :lol: :wink:
 
First Off:

1) I am not a local, I live on Long Island and Sugarloaf is an 8+ hour drive commitment to get to, and I would gladly pass over V.T and N.H resorts to get there.

2) I am not a racer, I like to ski all kinds of terrain, including bumps, groomed cruisers and everything inbetween.

3) The Superquad is not new, it was installed in 1994, by SKI Corp, the previous owners for most of the ASC empire.

4) The bottom part of the mountain has perfect begginer terrain that I thouroughly enjoy skiing with my 5 year old son, what mountain has steep pitches all the way down? Skidder has great bumps top to bottom, Double Bitter is a classic and narrow fall line trail loaded with bumps. King Pine bowl has Ripsaw and Misery Whip to challenge even the most advanced skier and White Nitro is just plain steep.

5) There snow reports are pretty misleading at times, but this is all part of the ASC misinterpretation of facts to sell lift tickets. And this is ongoing at all of the ASC resorts.

6) The worst thing about Sugarloaf is that it is owned by ASC, a bank owned company more interested in profit than skiing.

You ski Killington alot, that place is 1,700' of legitimate vertical and 1,400' of bullshit , lame crosscuts and flat traverses, and they lie to the extreme with their snow reports, I know, I have skied there from October 1st to June 5th, over a 20 year span of time. Unfortunatly they are the only early and late season game in town, that is close to NY, or I would rather ski on Jones Beach. Please keep up the negative reports about Sugarloaf and leave the place to people who know how to enjoy it. :wink:
 
You ski Killington alot, that place is 1,700' of legitimate vertical and 1,400' of bullshit , lame crosscuts and flat traverses, and they lie to the extreme with their snow reports, I know, I have skied there from October 1st to June 5th, over a 20 year span of time. Unfortunatly they are the only early and late season game in town, that is close to NY, or I would rather ski on Jones Beach.
i wouldn't call the lower 1400 BS, but it certainly does level off towards the bottom of the mountain. i'd call the double near the bottom definite BS though. iirc, it just services condos and the lower parking lot. about 15 years ago, my family drove a motor home up there and parked at the bottom of that lift. i think they had electric hook up, but i am not sure. that was killer.

the loaf is definitely not the only early and late season game in town. from NYC you also have kmart which is a lot closer and BW (both of which are staying open later than the loaf, and i think both opened before the loaf), also a lot closer. i'd have a hard time driving twice the distance as kmart for early or late season skiing.
 
so the cat report is that it appears to be down to 1 skiable line from the top....i would bet the asc would love to dump this place for sure.
asc doesn't own the cat.............

fwiw, i can't remember ever hearing someone dump on the loaf. everyone that skis at loaf raves about the loaf. i would never judge a ski area based on late season spring operation the weekend before the mountain closed for the season. if they reported a wind hold on the summit lift, it may have been windy at the top of the mountain but not the bottom. or it may have been ASC style making an excuse for shutting down part of the mountain to save money. in either case, seems like that closure limited open terrain. it's late season at an ASC ski area, you gotta expect that stuff to happen though, unfortunately.

the conditions you describe seem familiar to spring skiing. often times ski areas can not groom because it doesn't get cold enough. grooming a trail when it is significantly above freezing wrecks the cover. then a quick and sudden freeze comes in and you have instant boilerplate. usually when that happens, the turns suck royally until noon time when it corns up. can't blame a ski area for crappy spring conditions, it's a roll of the dice any where as it seems things stunk at the cat and kmart as well from your report.

not trying to defend the loaf or anything, i am no loaf regular and have only been there once. but that's a pretty harsh dumping considering you skied the place on the next to last week in april.
 
Thank you rivercOil for at least a little enlightenment on the fact that Sugarloaf is not as bad as Joegm makes it seem. I just get really :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: when someone bashes my favorite mountain, especially someone having skied it only once, in late April, and without skiing the snowfields.

With Killington i was just trying to explain that 3,050' of vertical is misleading when most of the mountain skis with alot less. The only way to get that vertical is with the Skyship, and that involves skiing really boring terrain. Most of the vertical at Killington is less than 1700':

Killington Gondola (1,642')
Rams Head HSQ (1,073')
Snowdon Quad ( 1,114')
Sky Peak Quad (1,525')
Bear Mountain Quad (1,184')

At least at Sugarloaf you get 1,750' with the Superquad, and if you ski from the summit with the Timberline lift you can get 2,600' of continuous
vertical on several trails.

For someone from Long Island Killington is basically the only late season game in town, the early season skiing in October is more or less a thing of the past with ASC in control, even my local ski area in Connecticut now opens before Killington does. I will be there next weekend with some of the AZ people, but I find it pathetic that they now have a pre-set closing date. Bretton Woods is just to far away, and the terrain open at this time of year is really lame.
 
i love sugarloaf i think it is one the best mountains in the east, everything off the spillway is awsome and the have awsome glades, i hate how the place is run but it is still an awsome ski area
 
Man...you've waited till the 2nd week in April to ski Sugarloaf..and expect decent snow? :shock: You're in the wrong timezone!
Some of us would probably like to find out what you're smoking :lol: ..ya' don't suppose you could place a few orders for us...
Unfortunately joegm, we haven't had any real snow up here for... :? ..2 months. They did a great job with what they had, but it's NewEngland. Vermont and NH's highest ranges have the altitude.....it's either there or out West.
 
river, my cutting and pasting needs work for sure. that line about dumping the loaf was suposed to be in a previous paragraph... it's placement mistakenly implied that cat is asc. u r correct , and i do know that cat is independant.
the loaf did a terrilbe job of managing their terrain on wed. god forbid they do little creative thinking outside the box. ( a foreign concept to a lot of these areas, imo ) if the weather shifted so much in the previous 12 hours that it changed the surface conditions of the snow overnight to junk, as it did, , they should have sucked it up, callled in gary the groomer on o.t and dragged some trails during the morning to provide a decent product to the public for the afternoon....they made a conscious decision to say " the hell with the public.. let them eat cake"
u talk about bs, ( why do you have to post profanity , btw ny skier?) ... bs is how loaf ran their operation on wed. bs is how loaf put out bogus reports since last sunday on their conditions, some of which advertised 6 inches of fresh snow...
what am i smoking?- whatever it is, it can't rival what someone who makes a conscious decision to bypass vt and drives 8 hours one way from ny to the loaf is smoking for sure.
i had no ax to grind at all with the loaf going in, believe me. i wanted a good day. it sounds like you do have an ax with K.
the killington rip makes no sense. the vertical argument is dubious. (total vert is so overrated ) ... k's lift layout is totally different and one does not get the feel of such long run outs, certainly no where near that of the loaf...not that i'm saying k is the greatest place on earth...but it sure kills the loaf....its kind of hard to ski 6 or 7 peaks and not have traverses... and at least they have been somewhat honest so far with their spring reports on terrain and open lifts
learning areas- i think that is great...god knows we need more of it at certain places... but don't confuse learning terrain with bad layouts...funny how i didn't see any learning area of bumps though in this vast learning terrain u rave about at the loaf.... oh that's right, everyone who skis moguls is already an expert :roll:
silly me, expecting decent snow conditions from a place advertising 120 trails , 6 moguls runs and fresh snow in april :roll:.. ur right, i should probably just put the sticks in the closet on march 20 like u must do .
 
Joegm:

I don't think that I have ever seen a post from you without some sort of bitching about one ski area or another, you sound like the kind of person who should buy there own place, as it is obvious that none of the other skiers/riders in the world are better or more experienced than you are :roll: :roll: :roll: with how to ski, or which resort to visit.

You expected good snow from ASC visiting Sugarloaf at the end of the season, get real. You make presumtions on what type of skier/boarder someone is, because they don't agree with you?? I find it offensive that you think that racing down a trail is boring, who the #$%^& are you to judge other peoples methods of enjoying a mountain. Sugarloaf does have intermediate mogul terrain on Spillway, they usually groom half and leave the rest as bumps. This is not a mountain that likes to groom trails when the temps are above freezing, so that may have been the reason for lack of grooming. At least it was snowing there on saturday, and not raining as it was in 90% of the rest of New England.

I skied at Killington on April 9-10th and they did very good grooming on saturday, and virtually none on sunday. The skiing on sunday sucked, most trails were like porridge from the start + they charged $67 for the delightful pleasure of skiing garbage, with very thin cover on most open trails, and a minimal amount of lifts operating. So where is the difference between them and Sugarloaf????? In retrospect, driving past Okemo, I could count the number of closed trails and bare spots on one hand, as much as I dislike the place, they seemed like a better option.

I have no axe to bear against Killington, I am just showing facts that there vertical drop is very misleading, when only a small percentage of it exceeds 2,000'. I have been skiing there for more than 20 years, and it is sad to see the place falling apart with mismanagement, while the season grows shoter and shorter each year.

As for hanging up my ski's in March, since I've skied every month of the year and plan to be at Killington into May, so that does not sound likely. I would be happy just to be on snow in the springtime, and not bitch about the type of surface, amount of terrain open, and available lifts.

If you don't like the loaf, fine, stay away, do all the people that love the place a favor.
 
Joe, I was at Wildcat on Friday, 4/22 and your assessment is accurate. Was my first time skiing there and I had a great time with my son David, so the lack of options wasn't a real issue. Snow conditions were excellent and stayed that way all day. Quad is fast, so we got 25,000 vertical feet in pretty quick. Bump lines were smooth and consistent for long stretches punctuated by the steeper pitches where bumps were more rutted and irregular. Good coverage for a 2000 foot drop.

Wish it hadn't rained Saturday and Sunday, screwing my chances of bringing David up to Tucks for his first time.

We'll be back in 2-3 weeks to try again.
 
BigSpencer":16eejmyx said:
Man...you've waited till the 2nd week in April to ski Sugarloaf..and expect decent snow? :shock:
Agreed. Sounds like you're a little late to be able to give the mountain a fair assessment. It's spring Joe, and flash frozen is the norm. If mountain opps groomed the whole mountain flat as a pancake, then there would be folks bitching that they whacked down all the bumps. The fact of the matter is, it's probably not in their best interest to send the groomers out every night during the tail end of April, especially mid-week. Most of the folks there are passholders by this point, and many of these probably already know how the place skis mid-winter.

I'd also like to suggest that you quit your bitchin' and just ski. My first visit to the Loaf was during Reggae Fest last year, and I would call the conditions pretty much crap - slush, ice, mud, grass, dirt, etc. Despite all that, I had a blast poking around all the bare spots. In fact, even considering how poor the surface was, I would say it was still more fun that my best day at Killington. The conditions for this year's Reggae were simply fantastic. Take a look at the pics linked from that trip report. Sounds like you were a little late this year, my friend.

I've never skied da Loaf mid-season, but I hope to in the coming years. Yeah - it's a haul, yeah - some of the lifts are kinda weak, but the mountain is pure magic. If you didn't feel that when you went, well, you just ain't never gonna get it.... :roll:

Sugarloafer since 2004
 
AlpineZone":3flp7mnx said:
BigSpencer":3flp7mnx said:
Man...you've waited till the 2nd week in April to ski Sugarloaf..and expect decent snow? :shock:
Agreed. Sounds like you're a little late to be able to give the mountain a fair assessment. It's spring Joe, and flash frozen is the norm. If mountain opps groomed the whole mountain flat as a pancake, then there would be folks bitching that they whacked down all the bumps. The fact of the matter is, it's probably not in their best interest to send the groomers out every night during the tail end of April, especially mid-week. Most of the folks there are passholders by this point, and many of these probably already know how the place skis mid-winter.

I'd also like to suggest that you quit your bitchin' and just ski. My first visit to the Loaf was during Reggae Fest last year, and I would call the conditions pretty much crap - slush, ice, mud, grass, dirt, etc. Despite all that, I had a blast poking around all the bare spots. In fact, even considering how poor the surface was, I would say it was still more fun that my best day at Killington. The conditions for this year's Reggae were simply fantastic. Take a look at the pics linked from that trip report. Sounds like you were a little late this year, my friend.

I've never skied da Loaf mid-season, but I hope to in the coming years. Yeah - it's a haul, yeah - some of the lifts are kinda weak, but the mountain is pure magic. If you didn't feel that when you went, well, you just ain't never gonna get it.... :roll:

Sugarloafer since 2004

Personally, most of my Sugarloaf days have been midweek in early-April. I'm a spring skiing junkie and that's typically when you can find nice soft corn snow everywhere on the mountain. Unless you happen to hit it on an epic powder day, I think April is Sugarloaf at its best. Unfortunately, when you combine a below-average natural snow pack with ASC budget cutbacks that reduce snowmaking base depth and cut back on the number of lifts that operate midweek in April, I doubt this year's mid-April product was as good as I've always come to expect.
 
Hey Joegm...I gotta tell ya not many folks agree with your report on the Loaf which brings in to question your ability to evaluate a ski area or ski. I think you could improve both of these skillsets by taking some ski lessons. From your post it doesn't sound like you're a good enough skier to master the challenging terrain at the Loaf in all conditions. If you strengthen your skiing, I think you'll be a much better judge of mountain terrain and snow conditions and you'll also enjoy the sport a lot more, not just at the Loaf, but at other mountains, as well.
 
I have never been disapointed on ski conditions I have seen at Sugarloaf, some might call me crazy, but I also went to Ste.Anne in the pouring rain (and willing to ski). Unfortunately, it was snowing hard instead. :lol:

In my eyes, there isn't any bad conditions, just good, great and amazing conditions. I always look on the bright side were I am skiing (I could be sitting at work :lol: instead). The only negative that I tend to find sometimes are human behaviours problem (ie. dangerous skier, etc). Even on the worst days, I try to work on the positive, it's makes for a better day. O:)
 
I love the Loaf. It's one of the few places in New England that I will pay to ski.The bottom is flat yes. But i've found that helps keep the novices off the top.The top is nice and steep and the single mountain is just plain big.
It's obvious your passion for skiing and bump skiing in particular runs deep joe,as it does with most of us who post here. We all know ski areas tell flat out lies. But that isnt such a big deal to me anymore.I know they are going to twist and stretch every factoid and tell half truths to sell tickets. We all know this. But we also have the ability to look at radar and temp data. I dont need a ski report to tell me anything except they are open and which trails. With all the information out there on the internet and some deductive reasoning we can get a pretty good idea of conditions. And it doesnt take a wizard of wall street to figure out the economics of running a groomer in the spring when waiting a day for Mo-nature to warm things up is free. It's the end of the season and they are closing. I can just imagine how much it cost to fill a groomers tank nowadays.
I think you'd really like Spillway,Skidder, Bubblecuffer and the King Pine area on a better day. The Loaf can be a magical place to ski.
Chromer?
((*
*))NHPH
 
Hey Joe, remember me, i'm the one who 1 year ago about this time told you that bumps are 80's, freestyle is in, and gay bumpers need to melt into the snow like the washed out knee surgery candidates they are.



So maybe, after seeing these posts, you've come around...

1) buy a pair of mogul skis and or pants off the rack, and 2) have an informed , intelligent, real conversation about freestyle mogul skiing....very sad indeed...haskell , what happened man?


I'll answer that, mogul skiing fell out of favor with and about as quickly as mc hammer.


And I don't quite understand, when complaining about sugarloaf...

loaf had not groomed seemingly for 48 hours...

yet...

and of course, the superstar is/was groomed flat... it was rock hard boilerpalte in the am.. the headwall was literally a sheet of ice and remained so ... the middle and the bottom became waterlogged oatmeal by noon and really was not fun at all...it was not corn,....

make up your mind tool!


and

the amount of people who were thirlled with the early morning rock hard superstar was depressing... i have never seen so many racers or wanna be racers out so late laying down and grinding their turns

hmmm...you must be an economics major for sure ha...you've never seen so many people out this late in the season, yet wondering why a place that makes MORE money when MORE people come is grooming a trail


the freestyle scene, seems to be dying or dead for sure...

not dead, just evolved, from limited ability bump skiers to freeride and newschool skiers, who are basically people that, like everybody else, got sick of tearing up their knees for no reason and decided enough was enough (dybvig, moseley, hall, etc) and saw snowboarding and said 'hey we can do that'

sugarloafer...well said, Joegm's skills are mediocre at best...

joe, my advice to you is take your mogul ski's, buy a groomer, a bunch of snowguns, and a little anthill somewhere, make your own moguls, and ski them, all by yourself...but stop infesting boards with your constantly annoying rants about this or that, as I, a professional lurker here, have noticed that pretty much nobody takes anything you have to say seriously.

Oh yeah, take some grammar lessons, or at least learn to type, my unconceived son could write a better paragraph than you.
 
Nah. Sugarloaf sucks. It's too cold and too far away. And it's true, they DO lie like a rug about which lifts are running and which trails are open, to the point where I usually make sure my skins are in my bag when I ski there. (Which isn't often, because of how badly they suck).

Everyone please just go to Sunday River, Killington or Mount Snow.
 
Back
Top