Utah Skier Days 2025-26 Decline Worse Than Colorado: Plummet 26%

ChrisC

Well-known member
It is truly shocking to see Utah's ski days drop by 26%, officially outpacing Colorado's 24% decline.

Based on the data, Utah Skier Days (2025-26 vs. 2022-23), it seems clear that local skiers are opting to stay home rather than endure a season of poor conditions. Do we have any solid data on how Oregon performed, or are they the only state faring even worse than this?





Utah Skier Days per Winter Season

1781119214911.png




Utah Skier Days Growth Rates
1781119153022.png
 
Last edited:
It would be interesting to see if more Utah residents (or Utah-adjacent) skiers bought IKON or Epic Passes, fueling this Skier Days growth (still more likely) versus Out-of-Staters

1781120082142.png
 
There would be many more Utah Ikon holders than Epic surely? The choice of Park City vs the four Wasatch areas plus Snowbasin...........
I don't know how Vail even competes in that race.
 
There would be many more Utah Ikon holders than Epic surely? The choice of Park City vs the four Wasatch areas plus Snowbasin...........
I don't know how Vail even competes in that race.
Park City gets a lot of vacationers traffic, whereas the Ikon resorts probably have a higher ratio of locals traffic.

Traffic and parking was much less of an issue this year in LCC and BCC, but I don't think many of us want low tide seasons as a permanent solution 😶‍🌫️ :-)
 
@jimk, if it were back in the old days before mega passes, would you just buy a Snowbird or Altabird season pass? How much would that (not a senior pass) cost?
 
@jimk, if it were back in the old days before mega passes, would you just buy a Snowbird or Altabird season pass? How much would that (not a senior pass) cost?
I just looked at this. $1569 for a Snowbird only pass and $2918 for Altabird. If I was like Jim and could access Snowbird easily and on weekdays which would result in over 20 ski days across the season I’d buy the Snowbird pass without thinking. Pricy but still stellar value for that hill assuming full snow coverage.
When considering quantity and quality of snow plus terrain variety is there a better lift served ski hill on the planet?
 
I would be firmly in the AltaBird camp. As it is, with Ikon about half my days include time at both areas. Formerly an AltaBird pass was about 150% of a single area pass. Due to the spat over parking/reservations/traffic you now have to buy the season passes separately.
result in over 20 ski days across the season
Living there, jimk is skiing more like 60 days. With that many I would still buy AltaBird. $2918/60 = $48.63, still sounds like a good deal to me! At any rate if you are there the entire season, Alta tends to ski much better early season and Snowbird better late season. Alta skis far better on a 3-4 foot base, so in low tide seasons like this one, I would likely be at Alta more often. I posted earlier:
alta open
15-Dec
31-Dec
15-Jan
31-Jan
14-Feb
28-Feb
15-Mar
31-Mar
11-12
50%
80%
73%
95%
95%
100%
100%
100%
14-15
95%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
17-18
35%
75%
76%
95%
95%
100%
100%
100%
25-26
25%
52%
96%
97%
97%
90%
95%
59%
bird open
15-Dec
31-Dec
15-Jan
31-Jan
14-Feb
28-Feb
15-Mar
31-Mar
11-12
24%
50%
50%
88%
90%
100%
100%
100%
14-15
31%
90%
95%
96%
95%
97%
94%
94%
17-18
6%
23%
27%
61%
82%
82%
84%
88%
25-26
23%
33%
87%
97%
93%
83%
93%
60%
Snowbird's rockier terrain can take as much as a month longer to get open in slow starting seasons vs. Alta.

Once you get into stronger sun and melt/freeze (not uncommon during my Iron Blosam week) the High T at Alta is routinely bulletproof until 2PM and won't soften at all on a cooler day. By contrast many of the north facing steeps at Snowbird that retain winter snow are more accessible.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top