Japan 2026

Tony and I had the "daily driver" discussion while at Serre Chevalier during a snow drought. I told him that his mid-90s didn't make sense for me when you're skiing mostly onpiste hardpack or offpiste with a bit of loose snow. People always swear that their mid-90s "are easy to get on edge" but IMO they look like a recipe for skidding most turns. I know that I'm not good enough to get my 98s on edge without a few inches of fresh snow.

Yesterday at Loveland -- my 82s next to someone's 115s. Why anyone would choose to use those right now in Colorado makes zero sense to me but hey, enjoy and get it on (ZZ Top reference):

View attachment 49264
We are both not accomplished skiers. Kylie in particular doesn’t carve turns regardless of what skis she is on.* I can and do get my Rustler 10s (102mm) on edge in good conditions. They are so fun. I love the feeling of being propelled out of a wide turn. There is no doubt I couldn’t get them up on edge in anything like icy conditions.
I’ll take my Armada Declivity 92s to Europe in about 5 weeks time. I find they work ok for me in up to about 8 inches of snow and they are certainly grippier on harder surfaces that my Rustlers.

*She seems to have fun anyway.
 
I’m at the Mammoth industry demo now for the 7th time. Last snow here was Jan. 8 so we will be testing lots of under 90 skis.
 
On the change of weather this time of year.
The hotel presented us with a special festival dinner last night to celebrate the end of winter.
att.4DySy7sfrQ0vV1KNYksc4-7qbv6cJWW4R3UX0JFqti8.jpeg


IMG_4377.jpeg


att.KuwSzCjzKxCzBYgysZKMqd4C_OFkdDGKWe7Tw-aUEWo.jpeg


att.Gawi7NVETWJvyNnq7V85fZrG236xaggeAF4Q12GY8aM.jpeg

Edit. I don’t know why the hotel has us back in February 2020. I certainly don’t want to relive the couple of years after that time.
 
Since I know virtually nothing about Japan's many ski areas, for the past year or so I've been gathering info from people's past trips here and on the German forums so I'll have initial guidance when I go there at some point in the future (for the moment, it's armchair travelling). I copied Sbooker's recent itinerary above and asked AI to provide an overview of the various stops:

That list is a real mix, from genuinely small/local hills to pieces of much larger interconnected zones. Here’s the practical breakdown from a skier’s POV:

Larger / more destination-scale (or part of major systems)

Myoko Suginohara
• One of the bigger standalone mountains in Myoko
• Long vertical, more legit destination feel
• Not “mega resort” by Alps standards, but definitely not small

Madarao
• Mid-sized to fairly substantial
• Known for tree skiing and sidecountry
• Bigger than a local hill, smaller than Japan’s giants

Yakebitaiyama (Yakebitaiyama & Okushiga area / Shiga Kogen)
• Large by Japanese standards
• Major groomer infrastructure
• Part of the broader Shiga Kogen complex

Okushiga Kogen
• Not huge alone, but upscale and substantial
• Functions as part of the larger Shiga Kogen ecosystem
• More “serious destination sector” than small ski hill


Medium / mid-tier

Ryuoo Ski Park
• Mid-sized
• Big ropeway, decent vertical
• More substantial than it first appears, though not elite-scale

Yokoteyama
• Individually modest, but high-altitude and linked within Shiga Kogen
• More about niche terrain and snow quality than size


Smaller / feeder / local-feel sectors

Yomase / X-Jam Takaifuji
• Smaller to mid-small
• Fun, often underrated, but not large

Ichinose Diamond
• More of a sector/base area than a major standalone mountain
• Useful in Shiga Kogen network, but individually modest

Kumanoyu (Kumamoyu)
• Smaller, old-school, weather-dependent
• More character than scale


Bottom line

Clearly not small:
• Myoko Suginohara
• Madarao
• Yakebitaiyama / Okushiga (especially within Shiga)

Middle:
• Ryuoo
• Yokoteyama

Smaller:
• Yomase/X-Jam
• Ichinose Diamond
• Kumanoyu


Important context

Japan can be deceptive because many areas function as “pods” within broader regional networks rather than giant single-resort brands like the Alps or North America.

So:
• Shiga Kogen = huge overall, but many individual sectors feel small
• Myoko = regional destination with several separate mountains
• Madarao = stronger standalone than many on your list

If your benchmark is:
• St. Anton / Trois Vallées → most are small
• Typical eastern U.S. independent hill → several are medium to large
• Powder/travel value → some punch above their size dramatically.
 
Since I know virtually nothing about Japan's many ski areas, for the past year or so I've been gathering info from people's past trips here and on the German forums so I'll have initial guidance when I go there at some point in the future (for the moment, it's armchair travelling). I copied Sbooker's recent itinerary above and asked AI to provide an overview of the various stops:

That list is a real mix, from genuinely small/local hills to pieces of much larger interconnected zones. Here’s the practical breakdown from a skier’s POV:

Larger / more destination-scale (or part of major systems)

Myoko Suginohara
• One of the bigger standalone mountains in Myoko
• Long vertical, more legit destination feel
• Not “mega resort” by Alps standards, but definitely not small

Madarao
• Mid-sized to fairly substantial
• Known for tree skiing and sidecountry
• Bigger than a local hill, smaller than Japan’s giants

Yakebitaiyama (Yakebitaiyama & Okushiga area / Shiga Kogen)
• Large by Japanese standards
• Major groomer infrastructure
• Part of the broader Shiga Kogen complex

Okushiga Kogen
• Not huge alone, but upscale and substantial
• Functions as part of the larger Shiga Kogen ecosystem
• More “serious destination sector” than small ski hill


Medium / mid-tier

Ryuoo Ski Park
• Mid-sized
• Big ropeway, decent vertical
• More substantial than it first appears, though not elite-scale

Yokoteyama
• Individually modest, but high-altitude and linked within Shiga Kogen
• More about niche terrain and snow quality than size


Smaller / feeder / local-feel sectors

Yomase / X-Jam Takaifuji
• Smaller to mid-small
• Fun, often underrated, but not large

Ichinose Diamond
• More of a sector/base area than a major standalone mountain
• Useful in Shiga Kogen network, but individually modest

Kumanoyu (Kumamoyu)
• Smaller, old-school, weather-dependent
• More character than scale


Bottom line

Clearly not small:
• Myoko Suginohara
• Madarao
• Yakebitaiyama / Okushiga (especially within Shiga)

Middle:
• Ryuoo
• Yokoteyama

Smaller:
• Yomase/X-Jam
• Ichinose Diamond
• Kumanoyu


Important context

Japan can be deceptive because many areas function as “pods” within broader regional networks rather than giant single-resort brands like the Alps or North America.

So:
• Shiga Kogen = huge overall, but many individual sectors feel small
• Myoko = regional destination with several separate mountains
• Madarao = stronger standalone than many on your list

If your benchmark is:
• St. Anton / Trois Vallées → most are small
• Typical eastern U.S. independent hill → several are medium to large
• Powder/travel value → some punch above their size dramatically.
Shiga Kogen is large but the individual areas (some of which are lift linked or bus linked) are small. The individual areas have there own lift ticket and many Japanese people buy the pass for the small area where their lodging is and stick to that sector.
 
Or was that comment not about the quality of the writing?
Absolutely positively not, cupcake! :icon-lol:

Instead of feature, perhaps I should've said "travel diary" or "travelogue." I was referring to the extent of the details, both written and photographic: a very German thing. Their reports often feature way too many photos IMO and mix magazine-worthy ski shots with less sexy parts of the trip that I wouldn't have bothered to include in my reports or articles.

For example, the spartan room in his one-star motel -- low-budget lodgings that I frequent a fair amount when travelling alone and don't need to be reminded of later:
1777973958995.png


Similarly: the view from said room -- definitely "keepin' it real" and not the Japan that you'd see in a tourist brochure!
1777974799756.png


Or this unglamorous office/warehouse area:
1777974157401.png


In one report, there's a shot of his room's toilet, which I definitely wouldn't document unless it was very posh!

It's when things fall into a "Dear Diary" stage that I lose interest in a report but that's just my personal opinion.
 
Instead of feature, perhaps I should've said "travel diary" or "travelogue." I was referring to the extent of the details, both written and photographic: a very German thing. Their reports often feature way too many photos IMO and mix magazine-worthy ski shots with less sexy parts of the trip that I wouldn't have bothered to include in my reports or articles.
What the Germans do is similar to some Australian trip reports. Given that some Aussies plan their trips to another continent a year or more in advance, they are very interested in travel logistics and pictures of base areas and food. Same for trip reports that are to hike big mountains. The pictures aren't all just of great views or the hiking trails.

I don't bother to read many trip reports that are more than a few years old. Even in Japan, the situation continues to evolve in terms of lifts and the area near the base of many ski areas/resorts.
 
I posted these Alpinforum reports on FTO in the late 2010s but good to revisit them. Each one is like reading a feature article in a magazine.

They had a lot of bad luck on that trip.

Ashidake - aborted, equipment failure, and no guide/backup help.

Yotei - great weather, snow good in cone, but one can see how wind-blasted, compacted, icy the rest was... our guide said don't try it in winter, the snow sucks! It's a springtime outing. It's 5k of survival skiing (well, until you hit the tree line).

Niseko - mostly closed lifts due to weather. Not a lot of powder laps. They were confined to just a few runs on the NW Hanazano sector and missed the backside and Annupuri areas. Missed a lot of Japan's best terrain.

Rusutsu - Looks good. Likely the best tree skiing on Hokkaido

Furano- one can see how confined the trees are in Japan. Skinned to the outside boundary.
 
Since I know virtually nothing about Japan's many ski areas, for the past year or so I've been gathering info from people's past trips here and on the German forums so I'll have initial guidance when I go there at some point in the future (for the moment, it's armchair travelling).

There are not that many 'hidden' areas on Hokkaido island without heavily sacrificing size.


All skiers go to the obvious targets:
  • Niseko. Only true-lift served alpine terrain. Large lodging base (Kutchan, Hirafu Village, etc). Skis very much like Mount Bachelor, OR.
  • Rusutsu. Liked its trees slightly better than Niseko, but both are good.
  • Kiroro. Nice mountain, tighter trees, good sidecountry, but needs help/touring to lap it.
  • Sapporo Teine. Smaller, but still steep in places.
  • Furano. Inland king, lighter snow.
  • Tomamu. Another inland resort.
  • Tokachidake and Asahidake. Sidecountry/backcountry areas. Likely need guidance.


Again, my critique of Japan is:
  • There are not enough trails (or "tracks" in Japan) to provide powder skiing for more than a couple of runs/hours, especially since the trail/ski pods are serviced by relatively high-capacity, high-speed lifts built in the 1980s Boom. Powder trail-skiing is equivalent to the US or Canada; in short, it does not last long. You are quickly going to be skiing cut-up powder by 12noon most places. The only benefit to Japan is the frequent refreshes during mid-winter and high-snowfall months.
  • Season: Very, very compressed late December to early March. The Ocean Effect turns off by March, like Upstate NY/Upper Peninsula, etc.
  • Elevation/Temperatures: Once the Siberian fronts stop or a warm storm arrives, it can rain. Much more often in Honshu than in the northern island of Hokkaido. (It started raining very depressingly on SBookers ski areas right after he left - lots of IG stories showing rainy Honshu).
  • Ja-POW = Tree-skiing is more equivalent to Eastern Hardwoods. The spacing is not great in many areas for linking long stretches of turns. Yes, it's very good for an Instagram Photo of slashing 2ft of powder over your head.
  • There is very little open, alpine terrain accessible from chairlifts. Exception: Niseko, which requires single chairs to be open and sometimes hiking to the summit. Despite Niseko being very well-known on the international ski circuit, I still feel like it is the superior ski experience in Japan simply due to the terrain that dominates (360 skiing, alpine terrain on every exposure, lots of trees with sub-alpine spacing, and tighter spacing, some clear/open cut areas (i.e. Alta/Snowbird vs. rest of Utah - or even Brighton/Solitude - terrain is definitely hed and shoulders above the rest!)
  • Ja-Pow can mean ski touring! Almost all the legit terrain on Honshu is off-limits to skiers within ski area boundaries, so touring is required. Also, Hokkaido skiable acreage is not huge, so touring and/or lift-assisted touring is commonplace. I have only brought my AT Gear to Japan, not to the Alps.

Overall, I prefer the long, huge, open vertical expanses of the Alps, and its terrain mix of bowls, couloirs, glaciers, and trees. Generally, one can navigate various aspects, sidecountry, and mega-resort scale to find decent snow somewhere.

Would I go back to Japan? Yes! In a heartbeat! I still want to reski/add a few Hokkaido mountains (inland, Asahidake, Furano). The culture, the food, the aesthetic, the vibe, etc.

Honshu is definitely the island where one can find under-the-radar "Little Areas That Rock" (i.e., North America's Alpental, Monarch, Discovery Basin, Mt. Rose, etc.) that are undiscovered by the Western crowd. The resorts under Epic/Ikon: Hakuba, Shiga Kogen, and Myoko, even have some lesser-known areas that SBooker exploited. There are a lot more. (However, go look up the February/March rain that these ski areas received after a great January and half of February.)
 
Season: Very, very compressed late December to early March.
For destination visitors, more compressed than that: Stick to January and first half of February. But that compression is why the powder probability during that time window is so much higher than anywhere else. Some ski regions like the Alps and most of western North America have almost zero compression. Average snowfall is similar all months December to March, and with volatility there's never a time frame where powder is an expectation. Even at Alta an advance booked week will have no 6 inch days 1/4 of weeks and just one day another 1/4 of weeks. But January in Hokkaido 3/4 of weeks will have more than one 6+ inch day.
Despite Niseko being very well-known on the international ski circuit, I still feel like it is the superior ski experience in Japan simply due to the terrain that dominates (360 skiing, alpine terrain on every exposure, lots of trees with sub-alpine spacing, and tighter spacing, some clear/open cut areas
I agree with this too. In 2011 and 2016 I still found powder competition far less intense than in North America. A decade later I do not know if that is still true. Other Hokkaido areas had much shorter fall lines, often with traverses and runouts consuming half of the more modest vertical, though with very little powder competition.
There are not enough trails (or "tracks" in Japan) to provide powder skiing for more than a couple of runs/hours, especially since the trail/ski pods are serviced by relatively high-capacity, high-speed lifts built in the 1980s Boom. Powder trail-skiing is equivalent to the US or Canada; in short, it does not last long. You are quickly going to be skiing cut-up powder by 12noon most places.
The powder still lasts longer than in North America. Part of that is snow may get tracked but not packed down completely, then reset with the frequent refresher (daily in our case in 2016) storms. That 1980's boom busted severely, with current Japan skier visits about on third the 1980's peak. Consequently some areas have closed and others have shrunk their lift/terrain footprints.
There are not that many 'hidden' areas on Hokkaido island without heavily sacrificing size.
The true under-the-radar places are in Tohoku, the far northern part of Honshu.

Ja-Pow can mean ski touring! Almost all the legit terrain on Honshu is off-limits to skiers within ski area boundaries, so touring is required. Also, Hokkaido skiable acreage is not huge, so touring and/or lift-assisted touring is commonplace. I have only brought my AT Gear to Japan, not to the Alps.
The Adventure Project groups do considerable ski touring on their Japan trips.
 
Last edited:
There have been lots of instances of mid winter rain on Honshu in the last 10 years.
We got very lucky with daily powder on the trip this year but a warm spell would have made the trip pretty shit to be honest. The mountains just don’t have the vertical or pitch (generally) to make non powder skiing really fun.
Central Japan has the advantage of semi decent elevation (Shiga) to fall back on if things are warm. Tohoku does not have that luxury I believe.
I thoroughly enjoyed the trip this past season and I was intending on heading back at the same time next year but I’m a bit cautious about risking flirting with the weather gods to be honest.
Western North America offers the best chance of a weather proof pre booked winter holiday in my opinion. Utah/Colorado have the elevation to protect against rain but they also have the high tree line to protect against white outs that the Euro Alps can’t offer.
Despite the above thoughts I won’t be going to USA or Canada next season but will do at least one Euro trip. If we decide against Japan we’ll do two Euro trips I expect.
 
Back
Top