South America 2026

[snowbird surfer]

Let me finish the buzzkill if you chased this storm since it's been a week:

• Portillo - closed the entire week. But 466 cm / 184 inches of new snow! YTD: 208 inches.
• Valle Nevado - mostly limited (2 full closure days), but cut off transportation-wise. Andes HSQ opened at a few windows on Sunday and Wednesday. The costs of getting stuck at VN for 5 days $$$ with nothing meaningful to ski. Yikes! But a few very deep runs. Storm totals below forecast.
• El Colorado/La Parva - mostly closed with very limited beginner lifts operating until Wednesday (lower mountain/frontsides). Storm totals below forecast. Current snow bases not really impressive at 90cm; they will need more.
• Nevados de Chillán. Just opened for the season; no mid- or upper-mountain terrain yet.
• Pillan. Mostly rain.

Argentina:

• Las Lenas. Curious how much snow they actually received. Not sure if anyone has been to the top.
• Catedral. Worse than last year? Just avoid,

Basically, no one skied for a week - except a bit yesterday.




Sure...roughly August 1st.

Portillo - typically the below cliff band is impenetrable except the main chute in center/left of chair. Looks like lots of lines might become skiable.

Note: Inca Lake is so deep (like Tahoe) that it never freezes anymore despite 10k elevation.

View attachment 52477

Me, in my head - “I’ll hop a flight to Santiago, proceed to Portillo and rip the super c in between lift accessed slay fest.”

You - see above.

Reality - no lodging, no access - always wins.

 

[ChrisC]

Portillo does pack a lot of terrain in a small footprint

They also somewhat snowboard-proof the mountain unintentionally. Vivant or Va et Vient lifts.

 

[Skieric]

I am considering going to Chile with an arrival into SCL on August 8. With another 16 days, are the Santiago areas likely to get most terrain open? I am only interested in going if my odds are good for skiing the majority of the terrain. I would ideally spend time at all 4 mountains. Ski Arpa also looks nice, however I cant figure out why their prices doubled from last year to this. Now its roughly $700 USD per skier per day with lunch extra.

 

[Tony Crocker]

With another 16 days, are the Santiago areas likely to get most terrain open?

That seems very reasonable if there are not more big storms.

Ski Arpa also looks nice, however I cant figure out why their prices doubled from last year to this. Now its roughly $700 USD per skier per day with lunch extra.

It was $150 when were there in 2007 and Patrick complained about price then. With less than ideal cover and conditions we were getting 4 runs and 9K vertical per day. Full coverage and good conditions maybe that's more like 5 runs and 13K.

Overall snow coverage was no better than La Parva though Arpa is heavily south facing.

 

[ChrisC]

The Access Road to the all Santiago ski areas

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[snowbird surfer]

I am considering going to Chile with an arrival into SCL on August 8. With another 16 days, are the Santiago areas likely to get most terrain open? I am only interested in going if my odds are good for skiing the majority of the terrain. I would ideally spend time at all 4 mountains. Ski Arpa also looks nice, however I cant figure out why their prices doubled from last year to this. Now its roughly $700 USD per skier per day with lunch extra.

That seems very reasonable if there are not more big storms.

It was $150 when were there in 2007 and Patrick complained about price then. With cover and conditions were getting 4 runs and 9K vertical per day. Full coverage and good conditions maybe that's more like 5 runs and 13K.

Overall snow coverage was no better than La Parva though Arpa is heavily south facing.

$700 for 9k?! sounds like a major rip off made possible by a monopoly. Far better to keep powder dry for kicking horse dump with local heli imo.

 

[ChrisC]

I am considering going to Chile with an arrival into SCL on August 8. With another 16 days, are the Santiago areas likely to get most terrain open?

Yes. It appears all the areas are making progress; Valle even opened its backside today. Again, these are initial openings, so they take longer: dig out lifts, create surface lift tracks, build catwalks, create pistes/tracks, etc.

I would ideally spend time at all 4 mountains.

I thought all 4 areas are worthwhile and each can easily consume a day. The weakest is El Colorado - I am not into the front-side snow fence aesthetic, but there is good terrain on the backside.

Now its roughly $700 USD per skier per day with lunch extra.

It was $150 when were there in 2007 and Patrick complained about price then. With cover and conditions were getting 4 runs and 9K vertical per day. Full coverage and good conditions maybe that's more like 5 runs and 13K.

That is a reasonable rate for a day of cat skiing, and 10-12k vertical with orientation is industry standard. Again, I cannot comment on the operation, but it seems like a worthwhile experience.

The heli operation at Portillo looks interesting, and runs were not crazy $ for powder and views of Aconcagua LINK . Given the strong snowfall to date in Portillo, it might be an alternative: half day lift/half day heli.

Far better to keep powder dry for kicking horse dump with local heli imo.

CMG Purcells: $1550 USD/day
Eagle Pass Revelstoke $1900/day

Vertical per Day: 12-15k at BC heli ops Eagle, Stellar, Selkirk-Tangiers, etc

 

[Tony Crocker]

The $700 is consistent with Canadian day cat skiing, but the odds of powder at Arpa are low given its latitude and the extreme volatile snowfall pattern very opposite in both regards to interior B.C.

If the helicopter at Portillo can get you to the Super C that’s probably worth it vs. a 3+ hour hike above Roca Jack.

 

[ChrisC]

Can’t compare cat skiing in sun/wind affected high density costal snow to heli blower in the Purcells.

Agree. I have made 3 trips to South America (2 to Chile) and never sought out a day at Arpa - primarily due to the fact that Coastal Mountain snow quality, consistency, and reliability do not offer the more traditional powder snowcat/heli experience.

I have seen some CA Sierra cat operations come and go primarily due to this issue. Can you survive with a 4-week snowfall gap in the heart of the season, bookended by copious Sierra Cement? Other snowcat ops can exist in the Rocky Mountains of the US.

However, I think you have to just evaluate Ski Arpa as a one-off: a unique Andes experience. There are no other places to ski with the highest peak in the Western Hemisphere, Aconcagua, as the backdrop.

 

[Tony Crocker]

Arpa was way cheaper than Canada in 2007 so worth a shot for a new experience. I would not recommend at current price for reasons ChrisC explained.

 

[ChrisC]

If the helicopter at Portillo can get you to the Super C that’s probably worth it vs. a 3+ hour hike above Roca Jack.

You might have a revolt (ski camps, Chris Davenport, others?) if the heli was landing on such a historic/sought after line. IDK.

Not sure where Heli Portillo flies, but they seemed to be ferrying skiers further away from the ski area footprint. The terrain definitely exists!


AI was not hallucinating (well, the hike info is BS) :

The Super C Rule

• Earn your turns: Portillo management strictly prohibits using a helicopter to access the top of the Super C.
• The hike: Skiers must complete a demanding 3,000-vertical-foot (1,320-meter) bootpack climb up the steep couloir on foot.
• Safety check: Accessing the Super C requires registering and meeting with the snow safety director or operations manager prior to leaving the resort boundaries

https://www.powder.com/ski-trips/classic-super-c-couloir

Quotes:

“It had been climbed before in the summertime; I climbed it in 1964,” remembers Purcell. “But it was first skied around 1980.”

“I remember being asked if a guest could use the heli to get to the top,” says Michael Rogan, Portillo’s on-mountain manager. “The answer was ‘no!’ If you want to ski it you have to earn it by making the climb.”

 

[ChrisC]

Reality:
Gain: 640m - 2100ft. Likely 2-3 hours at a fit pace.

I was not going to do this hike with 2 guys from Colorado (brother & friend) on our last day at Portillo. Versus an inclusive lunch/tab at Tio Bob's? And playing around on the Lake Chutes some more? Priorities.

We knew what it involved; there is a traverse on the route about halfway up with significant exposure.

 

[Skieric]

Arpa was way cheaper than Canada in 2007 so worth a shot for a new experience. I would not recommend at current price for reasons ChrisC explained.

I looked at Arpa last year and it was around $380 per person. That price made more sense and made it more appealing for the experience.

 

[snowbird surfer]

Reality:
Gain: 640m - 2100ft. Likely 2-3 hours at a fit pace.

I was not going to do this hike with 2 guys from Colorado on our last day at Portillo. Versus an inclusive lunch/tab at Tio Bob's? And playing around on the Lake Chutes some more? Priorities.

View attachment 52481


We knew what it involved; there is a traverse on the route about halfway up with significant exposure.

View attachment 52482

What planning app is this? Thanks.

 

[Tony Crocker]

Tony, would you happen to know the average density for Portillo/las Lenas?

No data but the best analogy is probably Mammoth. Coastal snow does dry out some lifted to that altitude but chronic wind breaks off the dendrites, making the snow denser. Mammoth density based on decades of data averages 12.9%.

 

[mmKUstorm]

Chillan won't be skiing well this season I think. The storms have been coming in too warm for its elevation. There is still almost no real base and the next storms look to rain to mid mountain at least.

 

[ChrisC]

What planning app is this? Thanks.

It's not a planning app per se. It's Openskimap.org, where I get/verify all my maps since they are topographical 2D or 3D, and can be oriented North (or South for the Southern Hemisphere) for best exposure. More backcountry/freeski routes are appearing (Chamonix, Monterosa), but not everywhere (Las Lenas).

Example: Aiguille du Midi / Vallée Blanche with a less popular route from Coumayeur, but no north face under tram routes. Surprised it's covered now.

OpenSkiMap.org

Explore downhill, nordic & backcountry skiing worldwide using this interactive map based on open data.

openskimap.org

Just to take the joy out of Super C:

Why hike when I can lap? When Portillo's traverses are open/covered, one can ski the lower half of the Super C - really, you are out of the couloir proper by this point and in a small bowl/face. Like 2-3x per hour?

Sure, the upper couloir proper looks amazing, but likely you will not have first tracks (or else you might be breaking trail on the hike up. And then the lower half, you might have knowledgeable skiers who know how to access it.

Green = Traverse
Blue = Lines/Faces/Chutes

Again, hike to Super C

Epic Couloir - who cares if you are not first?

The above photos are from this great Super C Couloir Description in a low-tide year/visit:

Ski Super C Couloir | Skiing in Chile - A Mountain Journey

The uber-classic Super C Couloir is always a great Chilean ski adventure.

mountainjourney.com

 

[ChrisC]

Chillan won't be skiing well this season I think. The storms have been coming in too warm for its elevation. There is still almost no real base and the next storms look to rain to mid mountain at least.

I keep watching... Yes, it looks like warmer storms are rolling in without large snow bases established in southern Chile.

Curious to see reports.

 

[ChrisC]

The expert zone below El Colorado / Valle Nevado, down to its access road, looks risky and fun.

Too bad the Chilean government put an end to this potential and many other improvements. What did they think $350 lift tickets were coming?

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

 

[Tony Crocker]

You might have a revolt (ski camps, Chris Davenport, others?) if the heli was landing on such a historic/sought after line. IDK.

....................

The Super C Rule

• Earn your turns: Portillo management strictly prohibits using a helicopter to access the top of the Super C.

Sorry, I should have know better or looked it up. It's like Palmyra Peak of Highlands Bowl but on a larger scale.

In all of these cases there is some rationale that the hike is a filter that keeps away most people who might get in trouble skiing. There are some of us who could havea handled the terrain OK with lift/heli access but perhaps not after legs are trashed from a hike of that magnitude.

In my case that hike was on Mt. Shasta but the 4,000 vertical of West Wall skiing, most of it in pristine corn, was in my comfort zone. The San Gorgonio hikes were comparably rigorous but I was ages 27-30 and skiing was like top of Mammoth. The only truly extreme run I've skied after a hike was Little Chute at Alta but the hike was only 25 minutes.