rfarren":3285gmyn said:rsmith":3285gmyn said:Only the more advanced boarders will typically hit the great lines (and it's arguable that due to tighter turns and a single edge that advanced boarder's actually do less damage than a good skier).
It's well past time to make the change...
Those great lines, at least many of them require traversing.... hence post holes. I strongly disagree with you that snowboarders make tighter turns, in fact most snowboarders make asymmetrical turns and are incapable of making symmetrical turns.
I doubt Alta would gain anything by allowing snowboarders. It's not as though their business model isn't working. I don't understand the whole "elitist" argument. I promise you this: if Alta saw that they could increase their profits by 15% by allowing snowboarders they would.
I really hate it when snowboarders talk as though they are being discriminated against. It's not like a snowboarders are a different gender or race.
I both ski and board and I ski Alta when I can so I don't feel particularly personally 'discriminated' against. I do find it very unfortunate that as a destination skier it's nearly impossible to ski Alta since many of my friends that I go on ski trips with solely snowboard and thus Alta is a non-option. Discrimination is a loaded word, for sure, and probably not right for this context. However, the skier-only policy does exclude a large portion of the snowsport population - namely young kids/teens that tend towards board sports (which includes basically all kids that grow up in diverse areas such as LA). Alta could likely continue to operate successfully as a business without ever allowing boarders, but I don't think that's the point. What the defenders of skier-only are basically saying is if you're a kid who is into the boarding culture and enjoys riding on one board instead of two, then we don't want you around. If that's not elitist, then I don't know what is.