Indy Pass

MarzNC has it right. The aggregate revenue is distributed in proportion to the aggregate skier days used at each Indy area.
 
There's been chatter on Harvey's forum about Smuggler's Notch joining Indy. That would make a pretty nice selection up there: Smuggs, Burke, Jay, with Sutton and Owls Head across the border. Even better if they could add Mont Orford but unlikely.
 
Indy retains 15% of pass revenue and distributes the other 85% to the ski areas in proportion to skier visit usage. I do not see a financial incentive for either Indy or the participating ski areas to restrict Indy Pass sales. In terms of protecting ski areas' pass revenue from locals, Indy has stated (in Stuart interview last year) that the two day maximum per area will absolutely never be increased.
I should know this by now but to confirm -- individual ski area revenues are based on how many Indy Pass areas are skied by a given subscriber? Thus, if someone skis ten areas, it's $400 minus Indy Pass's end (15%) and then the remaining $340 is divided by ten so each place gets $34 per day for that particular skier at the end of the season? Or is that $34 sliced and diced further based on how much a given day ticket at a specific ski area is?


Everything is aggregated. Customers are categorized, and some are discriminated against/added carefully.

About 10-20 core ski areas in the Northeast and Northwest constitute the bulk of the Indy Pass business. Their negotiated payouts from the Indy Pass Pool are likely higher than those of smaller Euro/Japan/other ski areas; it's not equal. Since Indy is responsible for up to 30%+ of their skier days, they need to stop selling the pass for a period of time and calculate and project all skier days at their partner resorts. This is relatively easy with the current user base, and then creating profiles for every new skier based on purchase and expected usage. Then they open enrollment periods, recalculate expected pass usage/estimate attendance, and calculate payouts. Scarcity creates hype, but they need enrollment periods.

Essentially, they need to block high-usage Northeasterners. And likely a few Northwesterners. Likely limit single males and retirees who might use 20-30 days. Essentially, avoid a retired New Englander or a young guy living in Boston. Too much usage. I don't know what demo overestimates their ski days - or just gets dragged along. It's healthcare, but for skiing - don't take the users.

Essentially, you cannot have everyone overwhelm Indy Pass Top-10 Redemptions (a few years old)— from Doug Fish on The Storm Skiing Podcast
  1. Jay Peak (VT)
  2. Waterville Valley (NH)
  3. Cannon Mountain (NH)
  4. Pats Peak (NH)
  5. Bolton Valley (VT)
  6. Saddleback (ME)
  7. Magic Mountain (VT)
  8. Berkshire East (MA)
  9. Powder Mountain (UT)
  10. Lutsen Mountains (MN).

And who cares who gets added? Just more marketing hype for Indy; their list/network gets bigger. For the ski area, the marginal cost of servicing an Indy Pass skier is almost zero; hopefully they spend extra on food, gear, and lessons. Most of these ski areas are underutilized. And it's marketing to skiers who would never otherwise visit.
 
About 10-20 core ski areas in the Northeast and Northwest constitute the bulk of the Indy Pass business.
I'm sure that is true. Maybe top 10 is all Northeast since Powder Mt. and Lutsen have left Indy.
Their negotiated payouts from the Indy Pass Pool are likely higher than those of smaller Euro/Japan/other ski areas; it's not equal.
Do we know this? Higher than those areas' proportion of Indy pass usage? We know that's the way Alterra and Vail handle partners; each one is a separate negotiation. And that is the most closely held corporate secret at Alterra in particular. I was under the impression that Indy Pass prided itself on being more transparent with its proclamation about the 85% of revenue sharing. I would be surprised if the proportioning varied by area and is not as MarzNC described. And FYI these ski areas should be happy with a 50+% yield, because that's rather typical for the ski industry in general per Kottke reports in the 2010s.
you cannot have everyone overwhelm Indy Pass Top-10 Redemptions (a few years old)
And how does limiting new entrants do this? The power users getting 20-30 days are surely renewals at this point. And when they reopen, you're saying that they are secretly blocking retired New Englanders or young guys living in Boston? Retired New Englanders are the core demographic of NASJA these days :icon-lol: , and we get Indy for free.

I agree with the rationale for continued growth in number of smaller underutilized areas. I can see why James' enthusiasm. Smallest tier of areas in North America usually means not that interesting. Not so in the Alps, still plenty of room for growth there.
 
Last edited:
The power users getting 20-30 days are surely renewals at this point.
Agree that the power users are renewing and are unlikely to ever stop using Indy. Reading posts in the Indy Users Facebook group, it's clear there is a small minority who are quite willing to travel all over the PacNW or northern Rockies based on using Indy. While some fly or drive from the northeast, most of those people lives in the west and drive. There have been quite a few people talking about using Indy in Europe and Japan.

The shifting going on for Indy is among the resorts that Ikon is courting. A few popular midwest resorts are now Ikon Bonus Mountains and off Indy. Although midwesterners who like variety and got Indy as an Add-on Pass before may well decide to keep Indy.

I've had an Indy Pass from the start. My home mountain, Massanutten, was an early adopter. Most seasons I get a Massanutten season pass no matter what I'm doing to ski at big mountains. The Add-on price for Indy meant that using it for 4-6 days in the southeast was worth it to me. There are 8 Indy locations in NC, VA, WV, MD. I and a couple intermediate Ski Divas from the east used Indy for a trip to Idaho to check out Tamarack and Brundage. Would never have planned that trip without Indy. Having been there, and skied Bogus Basin as well, I'd be happy to go back for a longer stay.

While the original vision of Indy being a low cost approach for people who ski less than 10 days a season and are only willing to drive for skiing still applies, the direction that Entabeni has taken in recent years is clearly different. For the smaller hills, the fact that Entabeni offers software related to operations could be a factor for deciding to join Indy. I saw Entabeni ticket boxes at Soldier Mountain a few years ago.
 
They've added three varied Austrian ski areas this week. They're all a healthy distance from each other/not part of a geographic cluster, which underscores ChrisC's comment above.

Good-sized Obertauern in the Salzburg Alps
1788786660919.png


High-altitude (for Austria) Heiligenblut
1788787661936.png


Low-altitude (in the Kitzbuhel Alps) St. Johann in Tirol
1788787348546.png
 
Meanwhile, Indy Pass's big announcement is coming tomorrow. As mentioned above, I hope that it includes Smugglers Notch.
 
Looks like there is chatter on SnowHeads about the Indy Pass for 2026-27. Presumably for use in Europe only. Can't imagine anyone flying from the UK or Europe to exclusively to ski Indy locations in N. America.
 
Can't imagine anyone flying from the UK or Europe to exclusively to ski Indy locations in N. America.
Let's not forget our Swiss friend Worldskitraveller -- I know that @Tony Crocker, @ChrisC, and @EMSC haven't! His inimitable roadtrip (absolutely no one wants to imitate it) featured 38 Indy ski areas (in red below) out of 79 total. About $10 each.

Maybe there are more Euros and UKers like him? :icon-lol:

Dec 27: Dodge Ridge CA
Dec 28: China Peak CA
Dec 29: Lee Canyon NV
Dec 30: Arizona Snowbowl AZ
Dec 31: Ski Santa Fe NM
Jan 1: Sipapu NM
Jan 2: Taos NM
Jan 3: Wolf Creek CO
Jan 4: Purgatory CO
Jan 5: Crested Butte CO
Jan 6: Powderhorn CO
Jan 7: Vail CO
Jan 8:| Aspen Highlands, Aspen Mountain CO
Jan 9: Buttermilk, Sunlight CO
Jan 10: Loveland CO
Jan 11: Eldora CO
Jan 12: Crystal Ridge, Little Switzerland WI
Jan 13: Granite Peak WI, Sundown Mountain IA
Jan 14: Chestnut Mountain IL, Welch Village, Buck Hill MN
Jan 15: Afton Alps MN, Trollhaugen WI, Wild Mountain MN
Jan 16: Spirit Mountain MN, Whitecap WI
Jan 17: Jackson Creek, Black River Basin MI
Jan 18: Nub’s Nob, The Highlands at Harbor Springs MI
Jan 19: Boyne Mountain, Otsego, Schuss Mountain MI
Jan 20: Alpine Valley OH
Jan 21: Peek’n Peak, Holiday Valley NY
Jan 22: Greek Peak, Titus NY
Jan 23: Jay Peak VT
Jan 24: Saddleback, Sugarloaf ME
Jan 25: Sunday River ME, Wildcat, Black Mountain NH
Jan 26: Attitash, Cranmore, King Pine NH
Jan 27: Loon, Cannon, Bretton Woods NH
Jan 28: Burke VT, Waterville Valley NH
Jan 29: Ragged, Pats Peak, Crotched, Mount Sunapee, Whaleback NH
Jan 30: Dartmouth Skiway NH, Saskadena Six, Mad River Glen, Cochran’s VT
Jan 31: Smugglers’ Notch, Stowe, Bolton Valley VT
Feb 1: Berkshire East, Jiminy Peak MA
Feb 2: Catamount NY/MA, Butternut MA
Feb 3: Mohawk Mountain CT, Hunter NY
Feb 4: Shawnee, Camelback, Blue Mountain PA
Feb 5: Montage PA, Mountain Creek NJ
 
Indy's coverage of New England is impressive and Snow Pass/Triple Play is picking up the remaining but valuable crumbs, mostly in NY State.
 
Indy's coverage of New England is impressive and Snow Pass/Triple Play is picking up the remaining but valuable crumbs, mostly in NY State.
Joe Hession noted on the Storm Skiing podcast today that Snow Pass was meant to be a regional pass. The fact that Snow Pass is not exclusive is turning out to be the biggest difference between it and Indy. Target market are people who ski less than 10 days for whatever reason. If it's because they are beginners or adults who are lapsed intermediates, so much the better.
 
Back
Top