Norquay, AB 3-4-11

EMSC

Well-known member
The little guy packs a big punch.

Clearly a smaller sized resort, yet also a surprisingly good hill that skis much bigger than you would think. 2-3" fell overnight and made things soft for yet another day. The morning was spent primarily on the HSQ Mystic Express hitting nearly every trail with a couple laps spent on the shorter Spirit quad including a trial run on the ski cross course they have set up (yep, a ski/snowboard cross course). The groomers and small bumps on the far side took much of the morning to lap with a few 'hidden' entrances to less skied runs being a nice surprise.

After an early lunch upstairs in the day lodge, the steeps of North American chair occupied the afternoon. Some really fun runs over here with American bowl and Gun Run being my favorites with solidly steep and unique terrain. Coverage was good with the exception of the initial entry point off the chair. Instead a second traverse 'lap' was completed by patrol (I think, maybe lifts though) during the afternoon for a new, clean entry to the trails up top.

A warm, mostly sunny day with great soft snow on all aspects of the hill. Also while nothing approached a lift line, for the little guy on the block there were quite a few folks skiing, running gates or etc... For a supposedly slower day, it more than lived up to any preconceived notions. The vert was nearly as much as what actually gets lapped on many lifts elsewhere, meaning the expansiveness was the only item missing; yet it skis so much bigger with little of each section or lift hardly visible from any others other making it feel much bigger than the stats say it is. No complaints at all.

Image00001.jpg


Image00002.jpg


Image00003.jpg


Image00004.jpg


Image00005.jpg


Image00006.jpg
 
I know Banff doesn't get that much snow, but I do believe it has the best scenery in N. America.
 
rfarren":v41bv5ka said:
I know Banff doesn't get that much snow, but I do believe it has the best scenery in N. America.

Concur on the best scenery part for sure. Only places that come close would be maybe the San Jauns in SW colo, though even those are less dramatic/severe and would seem to cover a smaller geographic area.

Tony would have the long term numbers on snowfall, but at least this year all of the resorts are pretty well covered right now. Plus I think 2-3" is the least amount of new snow I've skied all week.
 
J.Spin":17afx947 said:
EMSC - isn't that Mt. Rundle in Pictures 1 & 4?

Yep, it is... I goofed during the late hour - posting the TR after a long day.
 
Norquay's snowfall numbers are very low, something like 105 inches a year. It was decently covered when I was there in March 2002 but very cold.
 
I had a good time at Norquay and was, like everyone else, pleasantly surprised by the terrain off the North American chair. After skiing at places that are geared for big crowds (LL, SSV), it's always great to visit a local's hill.

I know that it gets lower numbers than the next nearest ski area, Sunshine, but 105 a year, how's that possible? That's less than Hunter!
 
Banff / Mount Norquay Mountain Stats
Mountain Terrain Season/Hours
Summit 7,000 Ft / 2,134 M
Base 5,350 Ft / 1,631 M
Vertical 1,650 Ft / 503 M
Annual Snow 120" / 305cm
Snowmaking 90%

Hard to believe..
 
jasoncapecod":1wagqxp4 said:
Annual Snow 120" / 305cm

And yet look at the great coverage on some solidly steep terrain this year... They must have some REALLY bad snow years mixed in to the average or something...
 
No, it's damn cold most of the winter at Norquay and mostly north exposed. Any snow that falls there isn't going anywhere for quite a while.

Some of the easterners don't quite get what a glaring discrepancy there is in snow preservation East vs. West due to altitude and humidity. When it comes to just snowfall, northern Vermont more than holds its own against many regions of the West, as amply documented on FTO by JSpin and others.
 
I might be wrong, but my recollection of Banff is that the altitude was fairly low by western standards.... at least from the base.
 
Base elevation in the 5,000 range at Banff is actually on the high side for western Canada, and higher than the top of any lift in the East.
 
I might be wrong, but my recollection of Banff is that the altitude was fairly low by western standards.... at least from the base.

I would think that the higher Latitude would make up for the lower altitude .
 
jamesdeluxe":1th76uvh said:
I know that it gets lower numbers than the next nearest ski area, Sunshine, but 105 a year, how's that possible? That's less than Hunter!
Tony Crocker":1th76uvh said:
Some of the easterners don't quite get what a glaring discrepancy there is in snow preservation East vs. West due to altitude and humidity.
Good grief. I wasn't comparing East vs. West or Hunter vs. Norquay -- I was just saying that for any ski region out west, snow preservation or not, 105 ain't much snow. When I was at Norquay four years ago, there was a decent-sized slide right alongside a blue groomer (scroll halfway down):
http://forums.zoneski.com/index.php?showtopic=7645
 
I just noticed that several of EMSC's Canadian Rockies features had been posted. Nice job!

As mentioned before, people shouldn't pass up a visit to Norquay -- there's some fun terrain there and in all likelihood, you'll be one of very few out-of-towners on the hill.
 
Hey James, thanks for the compliment. Norquay was definitely a surprise, in a good way.
 
Back
Top