All of us are vicariously enjoying Skidog's last weeks of pre-fatherhood freedom.
jamesdeluxe":2mik14u2 said:All of us are vicariously enjoying Skidog's last weeks of pre-fatherhood freedom.
I don't understand this at all. I've known plenty of dedicated skiers and rock climbers for whom having a kid made little to no difference in their playtime lilfestyle after the first 4 - 6 months. I've seen many families simply take the kid along (much to the consternation of those of use who really don't like children, the younger the worse - but that's a different topic for discussion).Skidog":lfksz7nj said:Im going to miss all this fun....i've only got a couple months left....
Marc_C":1yxyumvv said:I don't understand this at all. I've known plenty of dedicated skiers and rock climbers for whom having a kid made little to no difference in their playtime lilfestyle after the first 4 - 6 months. I've seen many families simply take the kid along (much to the consternation of those of use who really don't like children, the younger the worse - but that's a different topic for discussion).Skidog":1yxyumvv said:Im going to miss all this fun....i've only got a couple months left....
If it does put a severe damper on your outdoor activities, I'm assuming that pressure comes from your spouse/partner ('cause the kid sure can't do so yet). If that's the case, then your partner really doesn't understand who you are as a person, what drives you, and what your passions are.
Marc_C":22q6iaz6 said:I don't understand this at all. I've known plenty of dedicated skiers and rock climbers for whom having a kid made little to no difference in their playtime lifestyle after the first 4 - 6 months. If it does put a severe damper on your outdoor activities, I'm assuming that pressure comes from your spouse/partner ('cause the kid sure can't do so yet). If that's the case, then your partner really doesn't understand who you are as a person, what drives you, and what your passions are.
jamesdeluxe":vcj2qb9f said:Not meaning to pull rank on you, but I assume you don't have kids. Where else would the pressure come from other than the spouse or partner? If they don't have relatives nearby or substantial financial reserves to afford an au pair-type arrangement, his life is going to change. Even if she "understands who he is as a person, what drives him, and what his passions are," he ain't going back to 50+ days for a long time.
Nope. Never wanted them. Genuinely don't like them.jamesdeluxe":3joy5883 said:Not meaning to pull rank on you, but I assume you don't have kids.
Guilt? I don't know. People have kids and come up with all sorts of weird-ass reasons for their behavior!jamesdeluxe":3joy5883 said:Where else would the pressure come from other than the spouse or partner?
Why? That's my entire point. The partner who doesn't ski is entirely capable of taking care of the kid for the 6 or so hours of a weekend ski day and can do so both weekend days when you live within a half hour of Alta. If they're only "allowing" you out of the house for x hours or y days, then they really don't quite know who they married.jamesdeluxe":3joy5883 said:If they don't have relatives nearby or substantial financial reserves to afford an au pair-type arrangement, his life is going to change. Even if she "understands who he is as a person, what drives him, and what his passions are," he ain't going back to 50+ days for a long time.
jamesdeluxe":29n7483a said:Marc_C":29n7483a said:I don't understand this at all. I've known plenty of dedicated skiers and rock climbers for whom having a kid made little to no difference in their playtime lifestyle after the first 4 - 6 months. If it does put a severe damper on your outdoor activities, I'm assuming that pressure comes from your spouse/partner ('cause the kid sure can't do so yet). If that's the case, then your partner really doesn't understand who you are as a person, what drives you, and what your passions are.
Not meaning to pull rank on you, but I assume you don't have kids. Where else would the pressure come from other than the spouse or partner? If they don't have relatives nearby or substantial financial reserves to afford an au pair-type arrangement, his life is going to change. Even if she "understands who he is as a person, what drives him, and what his passions are," he ain't going back to 50+ days for a long time.
Admin":3puyliap said:In our situation it's very do-able. I can see a very different situation if a ski day involved driving at least a few hours each way.
My contention is that very little has to change, unless a partner is being completely unrealistic. And that is often driven by not understanding that their spouse doesn't choose to ski or climb - they do so because they have to. Admittedly, I've seen this far more in rock climbing than in skiing, where many more participants don't see it as simply an outdoor activity, but an essential component of who they are. I've seen more relationships fail than I care to remember because the non-participatory partner either didn't see (or wish to see) or understand this darker side of what we do. (I've also seen a fair number of spousal climbing partnerships fail because of competitive pressure or mutually exclusive obsessive behavior between the partners. Again, a whole different discussion.)jamesdeluxe":hhabyod4 said:...I was taking issue with MarcC's contention that very little will change.
I see something wrong right this statement, it's starts with ASSUMING that he doesn't get the pressure from home.Admin":1lmnueaq said:Assuming that he doesn't get the pressure from home, what's to prevent driving up canyon early on a Saturday morning, ski for a few hours and be back home shortly after noon? What real effect does that have on the home life? None, as far as I can see. Chances are his S.O. and child would be sitting around the house on a Saturday morning anyway.
Patrick gets it. And as an aside, my wife and I once had this exact conversation with Skidog's spouse. She was pretty shocked when she looked to my wife to support her position. Being a 5.10+ climber back in the day (before 5.12 and above even existed), my wife simply didn't.Patrick":19vmeu02 said:...it's starts with ASSUMING that he doesn't get the pressure from home.Your logic might seem okay, but tell that to his S.O. :wink:
Marc_C":2jvl083l said:My contention is that very little has to change, unless a partner is being completely unrealistic.jamesdeluxe":2jvl083l said:...I was taking issue with MarcC's contention that very little will change.
Patrick":3jlz57lb said:Good luck Skidog, it ain't that bad afterall.
Skidog":2yivnr4z said:Dont worry itll all work out....
I bet i get darned near 50 too......we can talk about that later though ;-)
Skidog":jndu34kz said:obviously I wish I could fast forward to when she can walk and get her on skis, but it will be super cool either way.
Patrick":23ib2arv said:Skidog":23ib2arv said:Dont worry itll all work out....
I bet i get darned near 50 too......we can talk about that later though ;-)
50??? After what I read from Marc_C, am sure your wife will want a talk about that later also. Maybe not now, maybe not next Winter, but at some point in time. :shock:
At that point, you'll be able to post it in the Apocalypse in the Kitchen thread. :lol:
Marc_C":1vb6302k said:Patrick gets it. And as an aside, my wife and I once had this exact conversation with Skidog's spouse. She was pretty shocked when she looked to my wife to support her position. Being a 5.10+ climber back in the day (before 5.12 and above even existed), my wife simply didn't.Patrick":1vb6302k said:...it's starts with ASSUMING that he doesn't get the pressure from home.Your logic might seem okay, but tell that to his S.O. :wink:
Skidog":1ibgbg12 said:Shes already agreed to one weekend day each week during the season..
If the S.O. is working full time during the week, he/she is going to want recreation time on the weekends too. Likely options to avoid conflict/resentment:Chances are his S.O. and child would be sitting around the house on a Saturday morning anyway.