Are you fully loaded and ready to pull the trigger if snow conditions warrant?
No, not really. A big IF. I just sit and watch. There is no reason, almost ever, to ski South America before August 1st:
- June/early July - Not enough snow for expert terrain most of the time.
- Mid-late July - South American Holidays.
Also, there's a high bar for me to return for any reason. I have been to my bucket list South American ski areas (Portillo, 3 Valles, Las Lenas, Bariloche/Catedral) with good snow. Why more?
Frankly, I am not sure whether skiing the Chilean Volcanoes/Lake District is worth the effort. Each ski area is about 4 hours from the others or from a regional airport. This adds travel time and $. Researching terrain (Chillan, Corralco, Antillanca?). Snow looks plentiful (not yet) but variable. Scenery appears unique. Highly enjoyed Chilean Patagonia / Torres del Paine.
Conversely, visiting Santiago-based areas (Portillo, Valle Nevado, El Colorado, La Parva, Arpa) is very efficient and similar to SLC:
- Arrive AM, ski arrival day, resorts only 45-120 minutes from Airport
- Can avoid Gringo Pricing (Valle Nevado, Farellones, Portillo) by staying in Santiago or Los Andes, and lodging/meals become very cheap/high value
- Depart PM, ski departure day
- Chile (well, Uruguay) is maybe the Costa Rica of South America: stable, relatively modern, successful
Easy. Excellent value. And the terrain at Portillo & La Parva, and parts of Valle Nevado & El Colorado is strong. To me, they ski like A-Basin, Loveland (slow lifts!), Solitude, Brighton, but with snow more similar to the feast/famine/consistency/quality of California's Sierra/Tahoe (but with more famine). Maybe like a Mount Rose or Sugar Bowl.
What can be a long weekend to Santiago becomes a full-week commitment to Southern Chile (2 travel days to/from), plus additional lodging/food/etc. And to ski a volcano-based resort that will likely have the best terrain closed 25-50% of your stay? You will likely pay 2x, use 2x as much time, and ski the same amount. Meh.
So overall, there is no real reason to go:
- I have no streak, and I have skied every month of the year; no need to repeat any month. (This uses up valuable time/$. I'd rather visit National Parks, scuba, sail, work out, travel - almost anything else besides track down small islands of snow.)
- However, if I lived in the Pacific Northwest and could day-trip (or snow-camp 1 night) and ski at Mt. Rainier (Paradise-south/Emmons-north), Snoqualmie Pass (Alpental/Snow Lake), and the North Cascades... maybe a 12-month streak once. That could be accomplished from downtown Seattle with 45-min to 3-hr commutes.
- New Zealand would be more interesting to ski, but snowfall is often low/poor, usually only 100-200 inches - barely enough to naturally cover expert terrain. (Expert skiers don't flock to Sun Valley, ID or Panorama BC most years - and have similar numbers. Zermatt maybe a little better).
- Euro Glacier Resorts - only an addendum to another trip.
- My motivation to ski is new, interesting expert terrain in good conditions. I would put the Southern Chilean ski areas as barely meeting that threshold. Overall, I would rather return to Japan (Honshu + Hokkaido), Austria (lots there), Catski BC (yes!), etc.
Basically, unless there is great snow at Chillan/Corralco (150-200cm+), and one can find decent $ lodging (Latin America charges $$$ for US/Western tourist spots like Cancun, Cabo, Machu Picchu, Patagonia, Las Lenas, Valle Nevado, etc.), it's not worth the time/money.
You can get leave on short notice?
I typically just schedule vacation time and weigh options. In this case, August in Massachusetts (Cape Cod - parents, friends; Martha's Vineyard - partner).
Work-wise, much of our development team is in the Boston area, so it's important to spend time with them. It's easy to drive up 60-90 minutes any day.
Would I want to make a detour/add-on?