Admin":3pyk0emi said:Oh, and Skidog, Main Chute proper is only about 800 verts.
the chute itself right?? the run all the way to bottom of Ballroom is longer than that.. No?
M
Admin":3pyk0emi said:Oh, and Skidog, Main Chute proper is only about 800 verts.
jamesdeluxe":28tdyabz said:BS has been called on those photos:
http://tetongravity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=114683
Marc_C said:Both "The Powder Hound's Guide to Skiing Alta" and McLean's "The Chuting Gallery" put Main at 43 degrees or so (and PHGtSA places Highboy at 45 degrees) but it has always seemed significantly steeper and eventually mellows out to 45. It certainly looks steeper than the other two!
/quote]
This would have to be based on snowpack....tuckermans ravine can vary depending on snowpack.
M
Marc_C":163d0mo9 said:One other important thing about Main Chute......
It's not nearly as steep as the photos on the first page of this thread suggest. Look at those carefully and you'll see that the camera was tilted a good 15 degrees!!!
That's been my interpretation. I've seen the top of Main Chute around 60 degrees - in July. And yes, there were recent tracks in it. You think it's no-fall/DFU now? You should see it when it's barely skiable!!! :shock:Skidog":1ntwqsp9 said:This would have to be based on snowpack....tuckermans ravine can vary depending on snowpack.
Marc_C":3277kwkx said:That's been my interpretation. I've seen the top of Main Chute around 60 degrees - in July. And yes, there were recent tracks in it. You think it's no-fall/DFU now? You should see it when it's barely skiable!!! :shock:Skidog":3277kwkx said:This would have to be based on snowpack....tuckermans ravine can vary depending on snowpack.
Admin":1tnlzfdj said:Oh, puh-leeze! I was standing on a sidehill, using someone else's camera and didn't have the benefit of a burst mode. Geez, I didn't get the horizon perfectly level.
Actually, being my own worst critic when it comes to photo composition, the first thing I noticed when I saw the photos for the first time was the messed up horizon.
jamesdeluxe":4sehukuw said:You had to know they were going to bust your balls in the first post when Particle said "this is going to be fun."
If you really wanted to prove your Alta coreness, you would've skied it with your Spats.
:lol:
Marc_C":8dg4kmny said:I still bet the first 3 -4 turns were a good 50 degrees despite camera angle...its near impossible to get a level shot there ya know...
M
Skidog":13tthg39 said:Just a shame you try to post "stoke" over there and they slam you like you were on some groomer...cmon...whats that about?
ctmoneymgr":1y4sivjz said:Marc_C":1y4sivjz said:I still bet the first 3 -4 turns were a good 50 degrees despite camera angle...its near impossible to get a level shot there ya know...
M
Oh, agreed...one can see why you wouldn't want to get too close to the edge of that (or any) cornice with one hand on a camera (not watching your feet!)...I immediately noticed that Admin was leaning in to get those shots...pretty cool!
Re: comparisions...the only two other runs I can reference are JH Corbet's and the Palisades at Squaw...when I was at JH, there wasn't much snowpack and Corbet's was just too gnarly for me to drop 20 ft onto hardpack as a mere noob...Palisades appears a little less initimating than Main Chute since there's only that brief steep pitch (100 ft. vert?) after dropping in, afterwhich you run out into a large bowl...not having skied Main Chute, while very difficult, it would seem to be not quite as nasty as Corbet's...thoughts??
jamesdeluxe":37149xka said:Skidog":37149xka said:Just a shame you try to post "stoke" over there and they slam you like you were on some groomer...cmon...whats that about?
To put it mildly, exposure ain't my specialty, so I'm in no position to say anything, but staying out of the pissing contests is rule number one over there. The more you argue, the worse it gets.
Skidog":2d6h1w0l said:Over there though James they make it sound like I was on a flat and the photog tilted the camera 50 degrees...Admin was off by MAYBE 10 degrees though Marc_c thinks 15....nitpicky...
Was that your first post there? If so, internet hazing. I also find that a lot of folks on that forum, uh, lack life experience (iow, either anonymous teenagers behind mommy and daddy's keyboard or acting like they are).Skidog":2d6h1w0l said:Just a shame you try to post "stoke" over there and they slam you like you were on some groomer...cmon...whats that about?
Marc_C":t430ux60 said:Skidog":t430ux60 said:Over there though James they make it sound like I was on a flat and the photog tilted the camera 50 degrees...Admin was off by MAYBE 10 degrees though Marc_c thinks 15....nitpicky...
OK, since this has gone into the realm of lunacy, I measured the horizon tilt with my handy BCA inclinometer (had to buy that one since my eyes can no longer read the super tiny indicator lines on a Life-Link inclinometer - next step is a digital Sunnto!).
Photo #07: 12 degrees
Photo #09: 14 degrees
Photo #10: 11 degrees
Was that your first post there? If so, internet hazing. I also find that a lot of folks on that forum, uh, lack life experience (iow, either anonymous teenagers behind mommy and daddy's keyboard or acting like they are).Skidog":t430ux60 said:Just a shame you try to post "stoke" over there and they slam you like you were on some groomer...cmon...whats that about?
jamesdeluxe":2f6mdcnp said:Dude, stop! Schoolmarm is the beginner's slope at Keystone.