Oz/NZ 2025

Sbooker

Well-known member
IMG_2381.jpeg


The socials are telling me there’s a season starter on the South Island. I’m really trying to resist skiing this coming SH winter. My travel has become one dimensional. I really worry what I would do if an injury prevented a ski trip.
I’m going to force myself to enjoy a trip to a beach. :)
 
If that ~6 weeks ahead of opening is anything like the US, then most of that ~4 feet of snow will have melted out in the next couple weeks (equivalent of a very early Oct snowfall for a resort that opens thanksgiving-ish in the US).
 
View attachment 45836

The socials are telling me there’s a season starter on the South Island. I’m really trying to resist skiing this coming SH winter. My travel has become one dimensional. I really worry what I would do if an injury prevented a ski trip.
I’m going to force myself to enjoy a trip to a beach. :)
As someone from the NH, considering taking a trip to SH winter, I am wondering why the hesitation to ski more locally?
 
As someone from the NH, considering taking a trip to SH winter, I am wondering why the hesitation to ski more locally?
The logical reason would be allocation of vacation time. I would say Brisbane and Perth are the two worst first world cities in the world for a skier to live. So we can applaud sbooker's dedication to skiing, which makes mine or perhaps even Patrick's pale in comparison.

Sbooker skiing within Australia is the equivalent in cost and travel time as me going to Whistler, except that the skiing in SE Australia is more like SoCal in both scale and snow reliability and probably more crowded.

New Zealand has better terrain, but I've skied there in 4 different seasons, and only one of those trips had snow conditions comparable to average in western North America destinations. Overall I'd consider NZ snow reliability in the ballpark with Vermont, which is a recipe for quality skiing mainly for those who make last minute decisions.

With regard to the current situation, it's not like late October 2021 was for us. We hopped in the car and drove the 5 hours to Mammoth to catch that early opening. Sbooker has complained before that Oz to NZ airfares are no bargain.
 
Last edited:
If that ~6 weeks ahead of opening is anything like the US, then most of that ~4 feet of snow will have melted out in the next couple weeks (equivalent of a very early Oct snowfall for a resort that opens thanksgiving-ish in the US).
Mammoth is one of the relatively few places where you can expect most of that snow to stick. We returned for another couple of days in mid-November. Meanwhile Palisades opened only for that Oct. 29-31 weekend and couldn't reopen until December.
 
As someone from the NH, considering taking a trip to SH winter, I am wondering why the hesitation to ski more locally?
Pretty much what Tony said. Lodging is not at all plentiful and is therefore extremely expensive (think Aspen) and has to be booked with no cancelation months prior. I'm not doing that when there is a decent chance of extreme low tide base or getting rained on. Don't get me wrong I've had some great days skiing in Australia but they are few and far between.
NZ accommodation is more reasonable cost wise but I've got to buy expensive flights and it's also a decent chance of sub optimal conditions. I would rather save the expense of the ski trip in our winter and pay the same to go to and ski in Japan in February.
 
Last edited:
I would say Brisbane and Perth are the two worst first world cities in the world for a skier to live
I sometimes curse* that we got this addiction. I have seriously recommended people from Brisbane not to even try skiing just in case they love it an get the bug (and resulting financial commitments) bad.

*Then I get to the mountain and think that I'd pay double to be there if I had to if conditions are great. :)
 
I am considering some skiing this summer. I am thinking of Chile (Valle Nevado/El Colorado/La Parva, Portillo +/- a day at Arpa) vs New Zealand. Can anyone share some personal comparisons between these 2 very different regions. Where am I likely to find some more steeper off piste terrain? I usually ski Ontario, Quebec as well as western NA(Colorado,BC, Alberta) the eastern firm/hardpack doesnt bother me. However true clear ice, breakable crust, chicken heads, etc are not any fun.
 
I am considering some skiing this summer. I am thinking of Chile (Valle Nevado/El Colorado/La Parva, Portillo +/- a day at Arpa) vs New Zealand. Can anyone share some personal comparisons between these 2 very different regions. Where am I likely to find some more steeper off piste terrain? I usually ski Ontario, Quebec as well as western NA(Colorado,BC, Alberta) the eastern firm/hardpack doesnt bother me. However true clear ice, breakable crust, chicken heads, etc are not any fun.
I can't offer any comparison between the two but if you go to the South Island of NZ be sure to check out Treble Cone. In my limited experience it's light years better than any other lift served skiing in this part of the world.
 
My Southern Hemisphere personal records page has links to extensive TRs and feature articles I have written if you scroll down below the summary table. There is a fair amount of commentary from other FTO posters in those TR threads too.

In either case snow reliability is far from western North America or the more reliable parts of the Alps. Thus I recommend avoiding advance $$$ commitments until there is adequate snow on the ground. While South America has larger scale skiing, New Zealand has more easily accessible alternative activities if weather or snow conditions aren't good. And you can rent good demo skis in NZ but you need to bring your own to South America.
 
Last edited:
There are rumours Albo is wanting to make NZ our seventh state……

Seriously though Kiwis are always welcome here because they are generally great people and good workers. But Kiwi immigrants are just a small part of the problem that is our insane housing crisis.
 
I am considering some skiing this summer. I am thinking of Chile (Valle Nevado/El Colorado/La Parva, Portillo +/- a day at Arpa) vs New Zealand. Can anyone share some personal comparisons between these 2 very different regions. Where am I likely to find some more steeper off piste terrain? I usually ski Ontario, Quebec as well as western NA(Colorado,BC, Alberta) the eastern firm/hardpack doesnt bother me. However true clear ice, breakable crust, chicken heads, etc are not any fun.

Santiago, Chile, is an easier, shorter, and cheaper flight from NA than Queenstown, NZ. I have skied the major areas in Chile: VN/El Colorado/La Parva/Portillo. (Nevados de Chillán is large and gets perhaps more snow, but it seems to be plagued operationally. I am going to avoid.)

I have not skied NZ, but I have been to Queenstown and went paragliding off Coronet Peak ski area.

My experiences/recommendations about Chile:
  • Do not book until there is a 40-50 inch snow base. You need that base because storms are enormous, but infrequent, and you can be skiing on snow 2-5 weeks old without a refresh. Many winters are bad because one of the typical 3-to-5 big storms never materializes. You miss 1-2 big storms and have a very, very below-average snow year.
  • Terrain: Everything is above the treeline, subject to significant winds. Therefore, you need big storms to cover everything.
  • Do not go before August 1st due to SA holiday schedules, and maximize the chance of snowfall.
  • Do not expect powder. Most likely, you will be skiing on spring surfaces following the sun. Snow has a relatively high moisture content. It's not Colorado or BC. It is California Tahoe-like skiing. If you like CA skiing, you will like Chile. Temps can climb quickly into the 50°F range after snowfall.
  • The terrain in Chile is not all that steep, but more rolling (i.e. akin to Back Bowls of Vail). There are very few chutes or extreme lines. Portillo is likely the best expert area and does have legit chutes, steeps, etc. Skis like A-Basin a bit (size/terrain). Valle/Colorado/Parva are more intermediate with a few steep areas thrown in..
  • Access is very close to the city, but the roads are challenging.
  • Infrastructure: No HS lifts, lots of surface lifts.
  • Cost. As is typical in SA, cities are cheap, and desirable tourist spots are expensive/NA prices. Resort areas are priced in USD to avoid/prevent currency fluctuations and prevent any deals.
  • Mountains: The Andes are massive. Very scenic. On par with the Alps, Rockies, etc.
  • Alternative Activities - Santiago city, wineries.
  • Three valley areas are linked, but there is not one lift pass. This isn't very clear. You must buy another ski pass to ski multiple mountains in one day.
  • Language: Portillo is all English and NA. Valle, too, for the most part. I am functional/semi-fluent in Spanish, so it does not register with me, but my accent is terrible, so I need to repeat things 2x.
Many of these can apply to NZ too. My impressions:
  • Snow. Likely less. You have a much better chance of getting a significant snowfall in Chile. Many bad years in NZ. I cannot speak to snow quality. Again, wait until there is a 40 in / 100cm base before committing - Unless you want to ski on grass and some rocks potentially.
  • Terrain. Similar - rolling. Treble Cone is the exception (steeper), similar to how Portillo is the exception.
  • Infrastructure. Better, more modern.
  • Lodging. Queenstown is likely a better value, but you are driving or busing to resorts. There is true resort lodging in South America.
  • Alternative activities - Lots.

My actions might support my recommendation—I have been to South America three times in the winter (Chile-2x, Argentina-1x) and made zero winter visits to New Zealand or Australia. But all are great countries to visit.

My favorites in Chile are Portillo and La Parva, and to a lesser extent, Valle Nevado.

Overall, if you are looking for a more standard NA experience, I think NZ represents that, but with far less snow than the West. South America is a different creature - a little rougher around the edge, but a big-mountain experience.

One year, I will go to New Zealand and likely ski the four areas around Queenstown. I'm not sure if I would add Mt. Hutt or a snowfield. Who knows? Driving in New Zealand is very tedious—scenic but slow on curvy two-lane roads.
 
I wasn't aware of NZers leaving their country in sizable numbers per this Guardian article. Australia is extolled as their promised land!

I have friends/a married couple from grad school (one Kiwi MBA/MPP) who work for the NZ Finance Ministry. It's a huge problem and a focus. If you are not a NZ citizen, you cannot work there - unless an employer fills out a multi-page application why every NZer sucks.
 
Last edited:
My actions might support my recommendation—

I would first go to whichever region gets a decent snow base (40"/100 cm minimum). Snow makes all the difference.

I don't think there is any obvious reason to argue Chile over NZ; both are very strong.

But look into the lodging prices and where you want to stay in Chile. On my first trip (2016), I mostly stayed in Santiago. It was great for a down day and food, but driving up to the mountains on a weekend was a pain.

My last trip to Chile was after a late powder dump (6 ft+) in September 2023, so you could stay anywhere cheaply and semi-negotiate the price.

Overall, I think Chile is a bit expensive at the resorts, but this was before Airbnb took over. (For example, most of my late March/early April ski days in the Alps were $125-150 for half-board (breakfast and dinner) walking distance - and you cannot get that value in Chile).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top